It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Functional connectivity (FC) refers to the statistical dependencies between activity of distinct brain areas. To study temporal fluctuations in FC within the duration of a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning session, researchers have proposed the computation of an edge time series (ETS) and their derivatives. Evidence suggests that FC is driven by a few time points of high-amplitude co-fluctuation (HACF) in the ETS, which may also contribute disproportionately to interindividual differences. However, it remains unclear to what degree different time points actually contribute to brain-behaviour associations. Here, we systematically evaluate this question by assessing the predictive utility of FC estimates at different levels of co-fluctuation using machine learning (ML) approaches. We demonstrate that time points of lower and intermediate co-fluctuation levels provide overall highest subject specificity as well as highest predictive capacity of individual-level phenotypes.
Using machine learning approaches, looking at the predictive utility of functional connectivity estimates show that time points of intermediate co-fluctuation levels have both high subject specificity and predictive capacity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Research Centre Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Jülich, Germany (GRID:grid.8385.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 375X); Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany (GRID:grid.411327.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2176 9917); Max Planck School of Cognition, Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.4372.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2105 1091)
2 Research Centre Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Brain and Behaviour (INM-7), Jülich, Germany (GRID:grid.8385.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2297 375X); Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Düsseldorf, Germany (GRID:grid.411327.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2176 9917)
3 Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Institute for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Düsseldorf, Germany (GRID:grid.411327.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2176 9917)