It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Trophic ecology and resource use are challenging to discern in migratory marine species, including sharks. However, effective management and conservation strategies depend on understanding these life history details. Here we investigate whether dental enameloid zinc isotope (δ66Znen) values can be used to infer intrapopulation differences in foraging ecology by comparing δ66Znen with same-tooth collagen carbon and nitrogen (δ13Ccoll, δ15Ncoll) values from critically endangered sand tiger sharks (Carcharias taurus) from Delaware Bay (USA). We document ontogeny and sex-related isotopic differences indicating distinct diet and habitat use at the time of tooth formation. Adult females have the most distinct isotopic niche, likely feeding on higher trophic level prey in a distinct habitat. This multi-proxy approach characterises an animal’s isotopic niche in greater detail than traditional isotope analysis alone and shows that δ66Znen analysis can highlight intrapopulation dietary variability thereby informing conservation management and, due to good δ66Znen fossil tooth preservation, palaeoecological reconstructions.
Sex- and ontogeny-related differences in diet and habitat use of endangered sand tiger sharks from Delaware Bay revealed by analysis of shark teeth zinc isotope values.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 Goethe University Frankfurt, Institute of Geosciences, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (GRID:grid.7839.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9721); Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Department of Human Evolution, Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.419518.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2159 1813)
2 University of California Merced, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Merced, USA (GRID:grid.266096.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0049 1282); Indiana University, Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Bloomington, USA (GRID:grid.411377.7) (ISNI:0000 0001 0790 959X)
3 Stanford University, Department of Biology, Pacific Grove, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000000419368956); Hubbs-Seaworld Research Institute, San Diego, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e)
4 Delaware State University, Department of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Dover, USA (GRID:grid.254989.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9548 4925)
5 University of California Merced, Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Merced, USA (GRID:grid.266096.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 0049 1282)