Full Text

Turn on search term navigation

© 2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.

Abstract

Biomass burning (BB) is a major source of reactive organic carbon into the atmosphere. Once in the atmosphere, these organic BB emissions, in both the gas and particle phases, are subject to atmospheric oxidation, though the nature and impact of the chemical transformations are not currently well constrained. Here we describe experiments carried out as part of the FIREX FireLab campaign, in which smoke from the combustion of fuels typical of the western United States was sampled into an environmental chamber and exposed to high concentrations of OH, to simulate the equivalent of up to 2 d of atmospheric oxidation. The evolution of the organic mixture was monitored using three real-time time-of-flight mass spectrometric instruments (a proton transfer reaction mass spectrometer, an iodide chemical ionization mass spectrometer, and an aerosol mass spectrometer), providing measurements of both individual species and ensemble properties of the mixture. The combined measurements from these instruments achieve a reasonable degree of carbon closure (within 15 %–35 %), indicating that most of the reactive organic carbon is measured by these instruments. Consistent with our previous studies of the oxidation of individual organic species, atmospheric oxidation of the complex organic mixture leads to the formation of species that on average are smaller and more oxidized than those in the unoxidized emissions. In addition, the comparison of mass spectra from the different fuels indicates that the oxidative evolution of BB emissions proceeds largely independent of fuel type, with different fresh smoke mixtures ultimately converging into a common, aged distribution of gas-phase compounds. This distribution is characterized by high concentrations of several small, volatile oxygenates, formed from fragmentation reactions, as well as a complex pool of many minor oxidized species and secondary organic aerosol, likely formed via functionalization processes.

Details

Title
Evolution of organic carbon in the laboratory oxidation of biomass-burning emissions
Author
Nihill, Kevin J 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Coggon, Matthew M 2 ; Lim, Christopher Y 3   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Koss, Abigail R 4 ; Yuan, Bin 5   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Krechmer, Jordan E 6   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Sekimoto, Kanako 7 ; Jimenez, Jose L 8   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; de Gouw, Joost 9   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Cappa, Christopher D 10   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Heald, Colette L 11   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Warneke, Carsten 2 ; Kroll, Jesse H 12   VIAFID ORCID Logo 

 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; now at: University of Chicago Laboratory Schools, Chicago, IL, USA 
 NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 
 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; now at: South Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, CA, USA 
 NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; now at: Tofwerk A.G., Boulder, CO, USA 
 NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; now at: Institute for Environmental and Climate Research, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China 
 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; now at: Bruker Scientific, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA 
 NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; Graduate School of Nanobioscience, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan 
 Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 
 NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA; Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA; Department of Chemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 
10  Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA, USA 
11  Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA 
12  Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA; Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA 
Pages
7887-7899
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
Copernicus GmbH
ISSN
16807316
e-ISSN
16807324
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2838179837
Copyright
© 2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.