It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Speech processing requires extracting meaning from acoustic patterns using a set of intermediate representations based on a dynamic segmentation of the speech stream. Using whole brain mapping obtained in fMRI, we investigate the locus of cortical phonemic processing not only for single phonemes but also for short combinations made of diphones and triphones. We find that phonemic processing areas are much larger than previously described: they include not only the classical areas in the dorsal superior temporal gyrus but also a larger region in the lateral temporal cortex where diphone features are best represented. These identified phonemic regions overlap with the lexical retrieval region, but we show that short word retrieval is not sufficient to explain the observed responses to diphones. Behavioral studies have shown that phonemic processing and lexical retrieval are intertwined. Here, we also have identified candidate regions within the speech cortical network where this joint processing occurs.
The neural dynamics underlying speech comprehension are not well understood. Here, the authors show that phonemic-to-lexical processing is localized to a large region of the temporal cortex, and that segmentation of the speech stream occurs mostly at the level of diphones.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details




1 University of California, Berkeley, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
2 University of Texas, Austin, Departments of Neuroscience and Computer Science, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)
3 Technische Universität Berlin, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Berlin, Germany (GRID:grid.6734.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2292 8254)
4 University of California, Berkeley, Department of Linguistics, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
5 University of California, Berkeley, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)
6 University of California, Berkeley, Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Berkeley, Department of Psychology, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); University of California, Berkeley, Department of Integrative Biology, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878)