It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
We investigated predictors of visual outcomes and injection interval in macular edema (ME) secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) treated with a treat-and-extend (TAE) regimen. All 48 patients in a multicenter study were followed for 52 weeks and received three monthly intravitreal aflibercept injections before the TAE regimen, with treatment intervals adjusted by 4 weeks, up to a maximum of 16 weeks. Various laboratory biomarkers and optical coherence tomography parameters were evaluated. Patients were classified into the extension failure group if they had ≥ 1 treatment interval decreased due to an increase in the central macular thickness compared to the previous visit and 18 patients were assigned to this group. In multivariate logistic analyses, presence of microaneurysms and prominent middle limiting membrane (p-MLM) sign, increased initial external limiting membrane (ELM) disruption, and higher total cholesterol were correlated with inhibiting a sustained extension in the injection interval (P = 0.015, P = 0.032, P = 0.037, P = 0.009, respectively). Therefore, in the patients with ME secondary to BRVO with these risk factors, early consideration of frequent injection may improve treatment outcome.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Daegu, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.413028.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 4447); Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Gumi, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.413028.c)
2 Dong-A University College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Busan, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.255166.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2218 7142)
3 Maryknoll General Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Busan, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.255166.3)
4 Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.254230.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0722 6377); 1.0 Eye Clinic, Daejeon, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.254230.2)
5 Chonnam National University Medical School and Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology, Gwangju, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.411597.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0647 2471)
6 Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Daegu, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.413028.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 4447); Yeungnam University Hospital, Yeungnam Eye Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea (GRID:grid.413040.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 0570 1914)