Internet addiction and its relationship with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, anxiety and stress among university students in Malaysia

Abstract

Background and aims

There is growing evidence on the contribution of psychological factors to internet addiction; yet it remains inconsistent and deserves further exploration. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the psychological symptoms (Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms, stress, depression, anxiety and loneliness) and internet addiction (IA) among the university students in Malaysia.

Materials and methods

A total of 480 students from different faculties in a Malaysian public university participated in this study. They were selected by simple random sampling method. They completed self-administered questionnaires including the Malay Version of Internet Addiction Test (MVIAT)) to measure internet addiction and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Symptom Checklist, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) and UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) to assess for ADHD symptoms, depression, anxiety, stress, and loneliness respectively.

Results

The prevalence of IA among university students was 33.33% (n = 160). The respondents’ mean age was 21.01 ± 1.29 years old and they were predominantly females (73.1%) and Malays (59.4%). Binary logistic regression showed that gender (p = 0.002; OR = 0.463, CI = 0.284–0.754), ADHD inattention (p = 0.003; OR = 2.063, CI = 1.273–3.345), ADHD hyperactivity (p<0.0001; OR = 2.427, CI = 1.495–3.939), stress (p = 0.048; OR = 1.795, CI = 1.004–3.210) and loneliness (p = 0.022; OR = 1.741, CI = 1.084–2.794) were significantly associated with IA.

Conclusion

A third of university students had IA. In addition, we found that those who were at risk of IA were males, with ADHD symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity, who reported stress and loneliness. Preventive strategy to curb internet addiction and its negative sequelae may consider these factors in its development and implementation.

Introduction

The internet has become part of our lives nowadays, as it connects the world and eases the lives of humankind. Nevertheless, the increasing use of the internet has led to increasing incidence of internet addiction (IA) especially among the youth. IA is defined as any online-related, compulsive behaviour which interferes with normal living and causes severe stress on family, friends, loved ones, and one’s work environment [1]. Particularly in the last two decades, IA has risen to become a global concern to the public [1]. A local study amongst selected secondary school students in Malaysia found that 49.2% of students were addicted to the internet [2]. During the recent COVID pandemic, a high prevalence rate of IA (83.5%) was identified among medical students in a Malaysian public university where its high usage may serve as a coping method against anxiety during the pandemic [3]. The department of statistics Malaysia reported that 91.7% Malaysian households will be using the internet in 2020 [4], with a 155% increase in children aged 5–17 years old using the internet from 2016 to 2020 [5]. The prevalence of problematic Internet users in Malaysia could be as high as 37% to 43.9% [6, 7]. 23% among school aged children were addicted to the internet, with users spending 2 hours per day during school holiday [8].

Many psychological factors have been associated with IA. Secondary school students with severe anxiety and depression scores were found to be addicted to the internet [2]. IA was also identified as a significant predictor for depression, anxiety, stress and suicidality [9]. A systematic review by Wang et al. (2017) found that attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) was positively correlated with IA among adolescents and young adults [10]. People with ADHD are vulnerable to IA due to impaired inhibition leading to lack of self-control and difficulties in self-restraint [10, 11]. Those with psychological symptoms such as feeling lonely, depressed or anxious may use the internet to cope as it offers many activities that could be accessed simultaneously, and one would gain immediate reward which may alleviate boredom and perhaps loneliness [12].

IA may potentially pose a threat to one’s health and social well-being. It can lead to procrastination, lower productivity, reduction in social life and physical symptoms such as backache and neck pain [13, 14], and fatigue [15] and the ill effect of sedentary lifestyles including overweight and obesity [16, 17]. A study by Ercan et al. (2021) explained that IA influences body mass index leading to obesity, poor sleep quality and attention and memory problems in daily life [18]. Poor academic performances among medical students were reported to be associated with IA and this finding was supported by another study conducted locally among Malaysian university students [19, 20]. Leung & Lee (2012) found that adolescents with IA often missed their classes and had low social skills which affected their academic performance [21]. In addition, IA had a negative impact on effort, dedication and energy to study among university students [22]. A local study by Ambad et al. (2017) that was conducted to determine the impact of IA on academic performance had concluded a bidirectional relationship between IA and emotional instability. Negative feelings such as stress resulted in emotional instability that led to excessive usage of the internet which had a significant impact on a student’s academic performance. Furthermore, IA itself causes emotional instability that could lead to depression [23]. Severity of internet use disorder was positively linked to depression, hoarding and obsessing symptoms [24].

Although the effects of IA have been extensively studied, the psychosocial profile contributing to IA is still under explored in Malaysia. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of IA and to determine the associations of socio-demographic and psychological factors (specifically ADHD symptoms, stress, depression, anxiety, and loneliness) with IA among university students.

Methodology

Study design and data collection

This study recruited students from the faculties of dentistry, medicine, optometry, pharmacy, and psychology of University Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), a public university in Malaysia. Data were collected cross-sectionally between February to May 2016. Based on the similar study, the sample size was calculated using the formula of prevalence, n = (Z1-α)2(P(1-P)/d2), with level of accuracy (d) taken as 0.05, and confidence level of 95%, at least 384 samples required for this study [25].

The inclusion criteria included: (1) UKM students, (2) aged between 18 and 24 years old, (3) Malaysian’s citizen, and (4) consented to participate in the research. There were no exclusion criteria for this study. Participants were approached after their classes with the permission of their lecturers. Those who voluntarily agreed to participate were explained the study’s procedures, purposes, participation benefits and risks, and assurance of anonymity, as well as their right to withdraw from the study at any point of time; before signing a written informed consent form. Those who provided consent were asked to complete the questionnaires. This study was approved by the Medical Research Committee of Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre and it abides by the regulations of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent amendments.

The instruments

Demographic data.

This questionnaire contains demographic variables of the subjects which included the participant’s age, gender, race and religion.

Malay Version of Internet Addiction Test (MVIAT).

The Malay Version of Internet Addiction Test (MVIAT) is a reliable and valid measure of addictive use of Internet, originally developed by Dr Kimberly Young [7, 26]. It consists of 20 items that measures mild, moderate and severe level of Internet Addiction. The questions need to be answered by using the response scale from 1 to 5 (1 = never to 5 = always) reflecting the frequency of the symptoms. The questionnaire also evaluate the frequency of functional impairment such as deterioration in performing household chores, school work and job performance due to internet use. The higher the scores, the greater the level of addiction and problems resultant from the internet usage. The cut-offs used are those with scores between 0 and 48 is considered as having no internet addiction while 49 and more is considered as having internet addiction. The instrument showed good internal consistency with Cronbach’s α = 0.91 [7].

Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) symptoms checklist.

The Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS) Symptom Checklist is a measurement tools to assess the ADHD symptoms which basically has two components that is inattentive (Part A) and hyperactive or impulsive (Part B) [27]. If the score is at least 17 for either Part A or Part B, the patient has symptoms consistent with ADHD and a more thorough clinical evaluation to understand impairments and history is warranted. ASRS has acceptable internal consistency ranging from 0.63 to 0.72 [28].

Depression Anxiety Stress Skills (DASS).

The DASS is a set of three self-report scales designed to measure the negative emotional states of depression, anxiety and stress [29]. It is a 42-item questionnaire. Each of the three DASS scales contains 14 items, divided into subscales of 2–5 items with similar content. The Depression scale assesses dysphoria, hopelessness, devaluation of life, self-deprecation, lack of interest/involvement, anhedonia, and inertia. The Anxiety scale assesses autonomic arousal, skeletal muscle effects, situational anxiety, and subjective experience of anxious affect. The Stress scale is sensitive to levels of chronic non-specific arousal. It assesses difficulty relaxing, nervous arousal, and being easily upset/agitated, irritable/over-reactive and impatient. Subjects are asked to use 4-point severity/frequency scales to rate the extent to which they have experienced each state over the past week. Scores for Depression, Anxiety and Stress are calculated by summing the scores for the relevant items. The cut-offs used are more than 9(depression), more than 7 (anxiety) and more than 14 (stress) [30]. It has revealed excellent Cronbach’s alpha values of 0.94, 0.90 and 0.87 for depressive, anxiety and stress domains respectively [31].

UCLA loneliness scale (Version 3).

This is a 20-item scale designed to measure one’s subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Always). The scoring is on a continuous basis with the higher scores indicate greater degrees of loneliness. This scale was reported to have good reliability and validity [32]. The cut-off used is more than 49 (loneliness). It also has good internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 [32].

Statistical analysis

The results were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 27.0. Odd ratio and Chi-square test were used to evaluate the association between independent variables with internet addiction; and binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the most significant factor that contribute to internet addiction after controlling for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 480 of university students participated in this study and about a third of them (n = 160; 33.3%) were considered to have internet addiction. The sociodemographic and psychological variables were summarized in Table 1. The participants’ age ranged between 18 to 24 years old with the mean age was 21.01 ± 1.29 years old. They were predominantly females (73.1%) and Malays (59.4%). The other ethnicities of the sample participants were as follows: Chinese (25.8%), Indian (11.3%), and other ethnic groups (3.5%); which reflected the ethnic distribution of Malaysia.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

For the association between IA and the variables studied, females were found to be significantly associated with IA p<0.001) together with all the domains of the psychological symptoms. The presence of ADHD symptoms was divided into two domains: inattention and hyperactivity. Each of the symptom domains was then classified to be unlikely and likely to have ADHD. Of those with IA, 71.2% and 54.4% of them were likely to have ADHD inattention and hyperactivity respectively, which were statistically significant (p<0.001 for both domains). Other psychological factors that were significantly associated with IA were: depression (p<0.001), anxiety (p<0.001), stress (p<0.001) and loneliness (p<0.001), as shown in Table 2.

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Table 3 referred to the subsequent binary logistic regression analysis which showed that depression (p = 0.189) and anxiety (p = 0.212) became insignificant when confounders were controlled in this study. Only gender (p = 0.002), both ADHD components of inattention (p = 0.003) and hyperactivity (p<0.001), loneliness (p = 0.022) and stress (p = 0.048) were found to have significant relationship with IA. ADHD symptoms of hyperactivity and inattention were found to be the biggest predictors of IA as those with hyperactivity had 2.4 times greater likelihood to have IA (p<0.001; OR = 2.427, CI = 1.495–3.939), while those ADHD symptoms of inattention were twice more likely to have IA (p = 0.003; OR = 2.063, CI = 1.273–3.345). Other significant predictors were stress (p = 0.048; OR = 1.775, CI = 1.004–3.210) and loneliness (p = 0.022; OR = 1.741, CI = 1.084–2.794).

[Figure omitted. See PDF.]

Discussion

This study found a high prevalence of IA among university students which was 33.3%. This result lies within the range and comparable to the studies conducted using the same scale which found a prevalence of 37% [6, 7, 33]. The Malay version of IAT scale is, to the authors’ knowledge, the only validated tool available in Malay to screen for internet addiction up to this point [7]. The former study measured IA among the adolescents while this study assessed IA in young adults who were attending university. Indeed, educational attainment was deemed a vital indicator of internet access in Malaysia [5]. A large proportion of the internet users (55.6%) who were still studying; were those who attended college or university [5]. Nevertheless, high proportion of the young group who used the internet excessively is rather disturbing as the internet could lead to physical symptoms, mental health problems including anxiety, depression and other psychopathological symptoms [34, 35]; together with social consequences such as lower recreational activities, poor academic performance and social withdrawal [36, 37].

This study also found a gender predisposition towards IA which concurs with the previous study findings i.e. there was an overall greater risk of IA among males [38]. The mechanisms involved are multifactorial and may be complex including genetic [39], hormonal factors, emotion or other psychological factors [40], perception of self-image, environmental and sociocultural factors [41]. Interestingly, it was observed that the discrepancy may not be as wide as before in several of the recent studies; some studies even found a female predominance in internet use [42, 43]. Understandably, over the decades, the internet has evolved as a tool of communication and information. The internet may serve not only the basic but more complex human needs in connecting people and other activities including entertainment, shopping and work that influenced the behaviors of the internet utilisation by the different genders [44].

Among the psychological factors that were examined in this study, ADHD symptoms, both inattention and hyperactivity; were the most significantly linked to IA with a greater than two-fold risk. A study by Concerto et al. (2021) found that ADHD symptoms were positively associated with severity of internet gaming disorder in adults [45]. The nature of the internet is multi-modal, fast paced with almost instantaneous response, and the games’ high stimulation may match the vulnerability of youth with ADHD [46]. Lack of external stimulation among ADHD individuals was significantly correlated with higher internet gaming engagement [47]. Most games incorporate multiple reinforcement strategies that continue to attract individual players to engage more and more to the game. This provides strong incentives to individuals with ADHD [48]. Moreover, the swiftly changing screens put marginal demands on attention and working memory [49], enforced effort, or writing [50] all of which are challenging in ADHD. A meta-analysis concurred the significant association between IA and ADHD and a variety of psychiatric morbidities including alcohol abuse, depression and anxiety [51]. Stress is another psychological factor that is found to influence IA. This study showed that those who reported stress had almost twice the risk of having IA. Some studies had linked IA with stress, depression and anxiety [52] and a few studies found only depression and stress to be significantly correlated with internet addiction [53, 54].

A more recent systematic review had found high prevalence of depression in people with internet gaming disorder with approximately one out of three participants affected with more severe depressive symptoms compared to the general population [55]. In our study, only stress was found significantly associated with IA. Depression, anxiety and stress have been proposed to affect a person’s activities, work, and studies, as well as influencing decision-making and coping mechanisms [56–58]. This study was conducted on university students who understandably would experience a fair level of stress in their academic pursuit. Engaging with the internet is an avoidance in coping with the stress as the internet distracts an individual from their actual tasks [59]. Identified psychosocial factors to moderate depression includes 1) avoidant coping style [60]; possibly through excessive use of the internet; and 2) campus connectedness; which is particularly relevant among the university students [60]. These variables possibly buffer the relationship between stress and clinical disorders like depression and anxiety.

Similar to stress, those who reported loneliness had almost twice the risk of IA. The internet serves as an avenue for escapism from real problems like loneliness, helplessness, and boredom [12]. Therefore, those who reported loneliness are more likely to be at risk of IA. Loneliness may give rise to IA from the human’s need to socially interact with another human being; whereby individuals may choose to express their emotions and thoughts to others through the internet and avoid face-to-face communication [61]. However, the relationship can be bi-directional. One may also argue that the excessive use of the internet leads to reduced social connections outside the net and social withdrawal [62, 63]; both of which lead to loneliness.

Limitation

The main limitations in this study include 1) it has limited generalizability to the Malaysian population as this study drew inference from one university in an urban setting, 2) it is a cross-sectional study; which could not imply causality in the relationship between IA and the associated psychological factors, and 3) participants who already had the diagnosis of ADHD/depression or anxiety were not excluded which could distort the results.

Conclusion

This study concludes that one in three of the university students was addicted to the internet. It identified the factors that posed greater likelihood to have internet addiction which include males, having ADHD symptoms (either inattention or hyperactivity; or both), stress and loneliness. The interactions between IA and psychological factors are complex and could potentially lead to substantial health burden in relation to young adults. It is recommended that future studies to examine the cause-and-effect and explore their in-depth pathways, in addition to determine the best preventive strategies particularly on the vulnerable group to curb the negative sequelae of internet addiction.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the respective faculties for granting the permission to conduct the study at the various departments and all the participants for their cooperation and involvement in the study.

Citation: Zakaria H, Hussain I, Zulkifli NS, Ibrahim N, Noriza NJ, Wong M, et al. (2023) Internet addiction and its relationship with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms, anxiety and stress among university students in Malaysia. PLoS ONE 18(7): e0283862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0283862

About the Authors:

Hazli Zakaria

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Imran Hussain

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Otolaryngology, Hospital Queen Elizabeth, Sabah, Malaysia

Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun (HRPB) Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia

Norazimah Ibrahim

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Jasin, Melaka, Malaysia

Nuri Jailina Noriza

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Klinik Kesihatan Beladin, Pusa, Sarawak, Malaysia

Michelle Wong

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

Affiliation: Klinik Kesihatan Bawang Assan, Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia

Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

E-mail: [email protected]

Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6262-229X

Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Supervision, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Contributed equally to this work with: Hazli Zakaria, Imran Hussain, Nor Sa’adah Zulkifli, Norazimah Ibrahim, Nuri Jailina Noriza, Michelle Wong, Nik Ruzyanei Nik Jaafar, Hajar Mohd. Salleh Sahimi, Muhammad Hanif Abd Latif

Roles: Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

Affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

ORICD: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3313-4147

References

1. Montag C, Reuter M. Internet addiction: Springer; 2017.

2. Abdul Aziz M, Wan Ismail WS, Bahar N, Mahadevan R, Shah SA. Internet Addiction among Secondary School Students in Klang Valley, Malaysia: What is the Association with Depressive Symptoms, Anxiety Symptoms, and SelfEsteem?. IIUM Medical Journal Malaysia. 2020. 17(2).

3. Ismail N, Tajjudin AI, Jaafar H, Nik Jaafar NR, Baharudin A, Ibrahim N. The Relationship between Internet Addiction, Internet Gaming and Anxiety among Medical Students in a Malaysian Public University during COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 12;18(22):11870. pmid:34831627.

4. Department of Statistics Malaysia. ICT Use and Access By Individuals and Households Survey Report, Malaysia, 2020. 2021.

5. Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Communication M. Internet Users Survey 2020. 2021.

6. Ching SM, Hamidin A, Vasudevan R, Sazlyna MS, Wan Aliaa WS, Foo YL, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with internet addiction among medical students—A cross-sectional study in Malaysia. Med J Malaysia. 2017 Feb;72(1):7–11. pmid:28255133.

7. Chong Guan N, Isa SM, Hashim AH, Pillai SK, Harbajan Singh MK. Validity of the Malay Version of the Internet Addiction Test: A Study on a Group of Medical Students in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP2210–NP9. pmid:22652253

8. Azmi SUF, Robson N, Othman S, Guan NC, Isa MR. Prevalence and risk factors of Internet Addiction (IA) among national primary school children in Malaysia. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2020;18(6):1560–71.9.

9. Wan Ismail WS, Sim ST, Tan K, Bahar N, Ibrahim N, Mahadevan R, et al. The relations of internet and smartphone addictions to depression, anxiety, stress, and suicidality among public university students in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Perspectives in psychiatric care. 2020. pmid:32363648

10. Wang BQ, Yao NQ, Zhou X, Liu J, Lv ZT. The association between attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and internet addiction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):260. pmid:28724403.

11. Chang C-H, Chang Y-C, Cheng H, Tzang R-F. Treatment Efficacy of Internet Gaming Disorder With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder and Emotional Dysregulaton. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;23(6):349–55. pmid:32047929

12. Zhang S, Tian Y, Sui Y, Zhang D, Shi J, Wang P, et al. Relationships Between Social Support, Loneliness, and Internet Addiction in Chinese Postsecondary Students: A Longitudinal Cross-Lagged Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2018;9, 1707. pmid:30258387.

13. Yang G, Cao J, Li Y, Cheng P, Liu B, Hao Z, et al. Association between internet addiction and the risk of musculoskeletal pain in Chinese college freshmen–a cross-sectional study. Frontiers in psychology. 2019:1959. pmid:31551859

14. Gałczyk M, Zalewska A, Białokoz-Kalinowska I, Sobolewski M. Chronic Back Condition and the Level of Physical Activity as Well as Internet Addiction among Physiotherapy Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(13):6718. pmid:34206426

15. Bener A, Yildirim E, Torun P, Çatan F, Bolat E, Alıç S, et al. Internet addiction, fatigue, and sleep problems among adolescent students: A large-scale study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction. 2019;17(4):959–69.

16. Tayhan Kartal F, Yabancı Ayhan N. Relationship between eating disorders and internet and smartphone addiction in college students. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity. 2021;26(6):1853–62. pmid:33034868

17. Tabatabaee HR, Rezaianzadeh A, Jamshidi M. Mediators in the relationship between internet addiction and body mass index: a path model approach using partial least square. Journal of Research in Health Sciences. 2018;18(3):e00423.18. pmid:30270215

18. Ercan S, Acar HT, Arslan E, Canbulut A, Oğul A, Çetin C. Effect of Internet Addiction on Sleep Quality, Physical Activity and Cognitive Status Among University Students. Journal of Turkish Sleep Medicine. 2021;1:49–56.

19. Khan MA, Alvi AA, Shabbir F, Rajpu TA. Effect of Internet Addiction on Academic Performance of Medical Students. Journal of Islamic International Medical College. 2016; 11(2).

20. Azizah Z, Marina D, Marini O. Impacts due to internet addiction among Malaysian university students. International Journal of Asian Social Science. 2013; 3(9), 1922–1928.

21. Leung L, Lee PSN. Impact of Internet literacy, internet addiction symptoms, and Internet activities on academic performance. Social Science Computer Review. 2012; 30(4), 403–418.

22. Yeap JAL, Ramayah T, Halim HA, Ahmad NH, Kurnia S. Exploring the impact of internet addiction on academic engagement: A preliminary study on undergraduates. Indian Journal of Management Science. 2016;6(1), 1–9.

23. Ambad SNA, Kalimin KM, Yusof KMAAK. The effect of internet addiction on students’emotional and academic performance. E-Academia Journal. 2017;6(1).24.

24. Moretta T, Buodo G. The Relationship Between Affective and Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in Internet Use Disorder. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12, 700518. pmid:34456816

25. Yang G, Cao J, Li Y, Cheng P, Liu B, Hao Z, et al. Association Between Internet Addiction and the Risk of Musculoskeletal Pain in Chinese College Freshmen—A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Psychol. 2019 Sep 3;10:1959. pmid:31551859.

26. Young KS. Caught in the net: How to recognize the signs of internet addiction—and a winning strategy for recovery: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.

27. Kessler RC, Adler L, Ames M, Demler O, Faraone S, Hiripi E, et al. The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): a short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychol Med. 2005 Feb;35(2):245–56. pmid:15841682.

28. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Gruber MJ, Sarawate CA, Spencer T, Van Brunt DL. Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self‐Report Scale (ASRS) Screener in a representative sample of health plan members. International journal of methods in psychiatric research. 2007;16(2):52–65. pmid:17623385

29. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales: Psychology Foundation of Australia. 1995.

30. Lee KW, Ching SM, Hoo FK, Ramachandran V, Chong SC, Tusimin M, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with depressive, anxiety and stress symptoms among women with gestational diabetes mellitus in tertiary care centres in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019 Oct 21;19(1):367. pmid:31638930.

31. Ramli M, Rosnani S, Aidil FAR. Psychometric Profile of Malaysian Version of the Depressive, Anxiety and Stress Scale 42-item (DASS-42). Malaysian Journal Of Psychiatry. 2012; 21(1).

32. Russell DW. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of personality assessment. 1996;66(1):20–40. pmid:8576833

33. Hashim A, Kaur M, Ng C. Internet addiction among adolescents in Malaysia: The prevalence and its association with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Malaysian Journal of Psychiatry. 2016;25(1):3–18.

34. Allen MS, Walter EE, Swann C. Sedentary behaviour and risk of anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2019;242:5–13. pmid:30170238

35. Khan A, Uddin R, Lee E-Y. Excessive recreational Internet use was associated with poor mental health in adolescents. Acta paediatrica. 2020.39. pmid:32777115

36. Salmela-Aro K, Upadyaya K, Hakkarainen K, Lonka K, Alho K. The dark side of internet use: Two longitudinal studies of excessive internet use, depressive symptoms, school burnout and engagement among Finnish early and late adolescents. Journal of youth and adolescence. 2017;46(2):343–57. pmid:27138172

37. El Asam A, Samara M, Terry P. Problematic internet use and mental health among British children and adolescents. Addictive behaviors. 2019;90:428–36. pmid:30579146

38. Hassan T, Alam MM, Wahab A, Hawlader MD. Prevalence and associated factors of internet addiction among young adults in Bangladesh. Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association. 2020;95(1):1–8.

39. Tereshchenko S, Kasparov E. Neurobiological risk factors for the development of internet addiction in adolescents. Behavioral sciences. 2019;9(6):62. pmid:31207886

40. Peris M, de la Barrera U, Schoeps K, Montoya-Castilla I. Psychological risk factors that predict social networking and internet addiction in adolescents. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020;17(12):4598. pmid:32604834

41. Jin Jeong Y, Suh B, Gweon G. Is smartphone addiction different from Internet addiction? comparison of addiction-risk factors among adolescents. Behaviour & Information Technology. 2020;39(5):578–93.

42. Mihara S, Osaki Y, Nakayama H, Sakuma H, Ikeda M, Itani O, et al. Internet use and problematic Internet use among adolescents in Japan: A nationwide representative survey. Addict Behav Rep. 2016 Oct 15;4:58–64. pmid:29511725.

43. Morioka H, Itani O, Osaki Y, Higuchi S, Jike M, Kaneita Y, et al. Association Between Smoking and Problematic Internet Use Among Japanese Adolescents: Large-Scale Nationwide Epidemiological Study. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016 Sep;19(9):557–61. pmid:27635442.

44. Sun B, Mao H, Yin C. Male and Female Users’ Differences in Online Technology Community Based on Text Mining. Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:806. pmid:32528342.

45. Concerto C, Rodolico A, Avanzato C, Fusar-Poli L, Signorelli MS, Battaglia F, et al. Autistic Traits and Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Symptoms Predict the Severity of Internet Gaming Disorder in an Italian Adult Population. Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 11;11(6):774. pmid:34207989.

46. Enagandula R, Singh S, Adgaonkar GW, Subramanyam AA, Kamath RM. Study of Internet addiction in children with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and normal control. Ind Psychiatry J. 2018;27(1):110–4. pmid:30416301

47. Chou WJ, Chang YP, Yen CF. Boredom proneness and its correlation with Internet addiction and Internet activities in adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2018;34(8):467–74. pmid:30041765

48. Masi L, Abadie P, Herba C, Emond M, Gingras M-P, Amor LB. Video Games in ADHD and Non-ADHD Children: Modalities of Use and Association With ADHD Symptoms. Frontiers in Pediatrics. 2021;9. pmid:33777866

49. Kofler MJ, Singh LJ, Soto EF, Chan ESM, Miller CE, Harmon SL, et al. Working memory and short-term memory deficits in ADHD: A bifactor modeling approach. Neuropsychology. 2020 Sep;34(6):686–698. Epub 2020 May 21. pmid:32437194.

50. Soto EF, Irwin LN, Chan ES, Spiegel JA, Kofler MJ. Executive functions and writing skills in children with and without ADHD. Neuropsychology. 2021;35(8):792. pmid:34570539

51. Ho RC, Zhang MW, Tsang TY, Toh AH, Pan F, Lu Y, et al. The association between internet addiction and psychiatric co-morbidity: a meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Jun 20;14:183. pmid:24947851.

52. Gholamian B, Shahnazi H, Hassanzadeh A. The prevalence of internet addiction and its association with depression, anxiety, and stress, among high-school students. International Journal of Pediatrics. 2017;5(4):4763–70.

53. Javaeed A, Zafar MB, Iqbal M, Ghauri SK. Correlation between Internet addiction, depression, anxiety and stress among undergraduate medical students in Azad Kashmir. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(2):506–9. pmid:31086541

54. Dong H, Yang F, Lu X, Hao W. Internet Addiction and Related Psychological Factors Among Children and Adolescents in China During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Epidemic. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2020;11.

55. Ostinelli EG, Zangani C, Giordano B, Maestri D, Gambini O, D’Agostino A, et al. Depressive symptoms and depression in individuals with internet gaming disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021 Apr 1;284:136–142. Epub 2021 Feb 5. pmid:33592432.

56. Edraki M, Rambod M, Molazem Z. The Effect of Coping Skills Training on Depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Self-Efficacy in Adolescents with Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2018;6(4):324–33. pmid:30465005

57. Penninx BWJH, Eikelenboom M, Giltay EJ, van Hemert AM, Riese H, Schoevers RA, et al. Cohort profile of the longitudinal Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) on etiology, course and consequences of depressive and anxiety disorders. J Affect Disord. 2021 May 15;287:69–77. Epub 2021 Mar 17. pmid:33773360.

58. Bishop SJ, Gagne C. Anxiety, depression, and decision making: a computational perspective. Annual review of neuroscience. 2018;41:371–88. pmid:29709209

59. Chou W-P, Yen C-F, Liu T-L. Predicting effects of psychological inflexibility/experiential avoidance and stress coping strategies for internet addiction, significant depression, and suicidality in college students: a prospective study. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2018;15(4):788. pmid:29670025

60. Servidio R, Gentile A, Boca S. The mediational role of coping strategies in the relationship between self-esteem and risk of Internet addiction. Europe’s journal of psychology. 2018;14(1):176. pmid:29899805

61. Candrasari Y. Mediated interpersonal communication: A new way of social interaction in the Digital Age. 2nd International Media Conference 2019 (IMC 2019); 2020: Atlantis Press.

62. Yusuf A, Rachmawati PD, Rachmawati D. The correlation of Internet addiction towards adolescents’ social interaction. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health. 2020. pmid:32833664

63. Kato TA, Shinfuku N, Tateno M. Internet society, internet addiction, and pathological social withdrawal: the chicken and egg dilemma for internet addiction and hikikomori. Current opinion in psychiatry. 2020;33(3):264–70. pmid:32101902