It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The cell envelope of Gram-negative bacteria belonging to the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) presents unique restrictions to antibiotic penetration. As a consequence, Bcc species are notorious for causing recalcitrant multidrug-resistant infections in immunocompromised individuals. Here, we present the results of a genome-wide screen for cell envelope-associated resistance and susceptibility determinants in a Burkholderia cenocepacia clinical isolate. For this purpose, we construct a high-density, randomly-barcoded transposon mutant library and expose it to 19 cell envelope-targeting antibiotics. By quantifying relative mutant fitness with BarSeq, followed by validation with CRISPR-interference, we profile over a hundred functional associations and identify mediators of antibiotic susceptibility in the Bcc cell envelope. We reveal connections between β-lactam susceptibility, peptidoglycan synthesis, and blockages in undecaprenyl phosphate metabolism. The synergy of the β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftazidime/avibactam is primarily mediated by inhibition of the PenB carbapenemase. In comparison with ceftazidime, avibactam more strongly potentiates the activity of aztreonam and meropenem in a panel of Bcc clinical isolates. Finally, we characterize in Bcc the iron and receptor-dependent activity of the siderophore-cephalosporin antibiotic, cefiderocol. Our work has implications for antibiotic target prioritization, and for using additional combinations of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors that can extend the utility of current antibacterial therapies.
The bacterial pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia and related species are often multidrug resistant because their cell envelope restricts antibiotic penetration. Here, Hogan et al systematically identify genes associated with resistance and susceptibility to cell envelope-targeting antibiotics, providing insights into underlying mechanisms and suggesting avenues for development of improved antibacterial therapies.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 University of Manitoba, Department of Microbiology, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.21613.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9609)
2 Universidad Nacional de La Plata, CINDEFI, CONICET-CCT La Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, La Plata, Argentina (GRID:grid.9499.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 3940)
3 University of Manitoba, Department of Microbiology, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.21613.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9609); University of Manitoba, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Winnipeg, Canada (GRID:grid.21613.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9609)