It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Neurons throughout the sensory pathway adapt their responses depending on the statistical structure of the sensory environment. Contrast gain control is a form of adaptation in the auditory cortex, but it is unclear whether the dynamics of gain control reflect efficient adaptation, and whether they shape behavioral perception. Here, we trained mice to detect a target presented in background noise shortly after a change in the contrast of the background. The observed changes in cortical gain and behavioral detection followed the dynamics of a normative model of efficient contrast gain control; specifically, target detection and sensitivity improved slowly in low contrast, but degraded rapidly in high contrast. Auditory cortex was required for this task, and cortical responses were not only similarly affected by contrast but predicted variability in behavioral performance. Combined, our results demonstrate that dynamic gain adaptation supports efficient coding in auditory cortex and predicts the perception of sounds in noise.
The auditory system adapts to properties of sounds reaching the ear, but it is unclear whether this affects the way sounds are perceived. Here, the authors found that auditory responses in the brain predict changes in the perception of sounds, suggesting that adaptation shapes the way we hear.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 University of Pennsylvania, Psychology Graduate Group, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
2 Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Faculty of Biology, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.5252.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 973X); Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.455093.e)
3 International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Trieste, Italy (GRID:grid.5970.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 1762 9868)
4 University of Pennsylvania, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Neuroscience Graduate Group, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
5 University of Pennsylvania, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)
6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, USA (GRID:grid.443970.d)
7 University of Pennsylvania, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Neuroscience Graduate Group, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972); University of Pennsylvania, Department of Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Philadelphia, USA (GRID:grid.25879.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8972)