It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Purpose
The present study aimed to investigate whether exposure to a patient decision aid (PDA) had an impact on the proportion of patients selecting non-surgical or surgical treatments after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and whether exposure to a PDA affected the proportion of patients switching from non-surgical to surgical treatment within the first year.
Methods
In a consecutive case series, proportions of surgery and non-surgery were compared before and after patients’ exposure to a PDA. Data were collected from the health records of patients with ACL injuries who presented to the Clinic of Sports Traumatology. To identify proportional differences between the two groups, t-tests and proportion tests were used.
Results
In total, 1,053 patients with ACL injuries were included: 563 patients with no exposure to the PDA (January 2015 to January 2017) and 490 patients with exposure to the PDA (January 2017 to January 2019). Before implementing the PDA, 27% of the patients selected non-surgical treatment. After implementing the PDA, 30% choose non-surgical treatment (p > 0.05). Before implementing the PDA, 21% of patients who initially chose non-surgical treatment had surgery within the first year. After implementation of the PDA, this number fell to 16%, but the difference was not statistically significant (p > 0,05).
Conclusion
Exposure to the PDA did not significantly alter the proportion of ACL injury patients selecting non-surgical or surgical treatments or the proportion of patients switching to surgery within the first year.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Aarhus University Hospital, Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.154185.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 597X); Aarhus University Hospital, Research Centre of Patient Involvement, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.154185.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 597X)
2 Aarhus University Hospital, Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.154185.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 597X)
3 University of Copenhagen, Department of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X); Copenhagen University Hospital – Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen, Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.4973.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0646 7373)
4 Aarhus University Hospital, Clinic of Sports Traumatology, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.154185.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0512 597X); Aarhus University, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)