It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
While the main focus of numerous engineering-geological investigations is to determine load-bearing capacity and settlement in engineering structures, this article aims to point at the specificity of sewer system engineering-geological investigations, which focuses on workability of soils and rocks. The study deals with workability class assessment of seven different sewer system localities. The significance of this research lies in the mutual comparison of workability class assessment of these seven localities in terms of two different workability standards. Each of the standards represents an independent model of assessment and classification of workability. The first standard (CSN 73 1001) classifies soils and rocks into seven workability classes, while the second (EN ISO 14688) comprises only three workability classes. Each of the approaches has its advantages and disadvantages. In comparison to the first one, the second standard permits faster and easier classification of rocks, but may be less fair to investors or developers when considering the real engineering-geological conditions and costs of implementation. Rocks were newly classified into three (easy, medium and difficult) categories of earthwork realization difficulty. In the study, 33 layers were classified in the category of easy realization of earthworks, 8 layers in the category of a medium degree of earthwork realization difficulty, and two layers in the category of a difficult realization of earthworks.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Ostrava, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.440850.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9643 2828)
2 Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences, Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Environmental Engineering and Geodesy, Wrocław, Poland (GRID:grid.411200.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0694 6014)
3 VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Department of Geoinformatics, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Ostrava, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.440850.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9643 2828)
4 VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, Ostrava, Czech Republic (GRID:grid.440850.d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9643 2828)