1 Introduction
Delhi is one of the world's most polluted cities and experiences its most severe pollution episodes during winter due to stagnant meteorology and a compressed boundary layer (Guttikunda and Gurjar, 2012). Industry, agricultural burning, brick kilns, and traffic contribute substantially towards urban haze, in addition to widespread small-scale sources such as cooking emissions and waste and fuel burning (Rai et al., 2020; Guttikunda and Calori, 2013; Lalchandani et al., 2021; Pant et al., 2015). Many of these are known to emit large quantities of chlorine (Rai et al., 2020; Gunthe et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022).
Consequently, particulate chloride concentrations in Delhi are higher than anywhere else in the world where measurements have been made. Chloride makes up around 10 % of the submicron particulate matter by mass (Pant et al., 2015; Gunthe et al., 2021; Gani et al., 2019; Tobler et al., 2020) and, from our observations, as much as 38 % in some cases, compared with 4 % during the winter in Beijing (Zhang et al., 2020). The ramifications of this are only now beginning to be understood. For example, new research has shown that chloride significantly impacts haze and fog formation in Delhi as a result of enhanced water uptake (Gunthe et al., 2021). The severe consequences for human health are made all the more critical by the city's extremely high population density (11 000 people per square kilometre in 2011; Joshi, 2011).
High levels of particulate chloride can result in production of the chlorine radical (Cl), a highly reactive oxidant. Many volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are oxidised by Cl at rates far exceeding that of the hydroxyl radical (OH; Spicer et al., 1998; Osthoff et al., 2008), the main atmospheric oxidant, meaning that even low Cl concentrations substantially increase atmospheric reactivity. This can in turn increase secondary organic aerosol (SOA; Dhulipala et al., 2019; Wang and Hildebrandt Ruiz, 2018) and therefore urban haze formation.
In the urban environment, Cl is extracted from particle-phase chloride when both nitrogen dioxide (NO) and ozone (O) are present. Reactions between NO and O produce the nitrate radical (NO), another prominent atmospheric oxidant, which forms an equilibrium with dinitrogen pentoxide (NO). Heterogeneous reactions between gaseous NO and particulate chloride produce nitryl chloride (ClNO). Due to both the instability of NO in daylight and the fast reaction between NO and NO (Table S1 in the Supplement), NO and NO are commonly depleted during the day and increase at night (Wang et al., 2017). This pattern promotes the accumulation of nighttime ClNO. After sunrise, ClNO is photolysed and Cl liberated.
Here, we present evidence that this diel cycle is inverted in Delhi, with NO and NO primarily being present during the day. Observations of NO and ClNO were carried out using an iodide chemical ionisation mass spectrometer fitted with a filter inlet for gases and aerosols (FIGAERO-CIMS) in January and February 2019, as part of a larger-scale effort to characterise the physical and chemical properties of Delhi's urban haze (Lalchandani et al., 2021; Rai et al., 2020; A. Singh et al., 2021; Kumar et al., 2022). During the campaign, we observed particulate chloride loadings in excess of 100 g m on several occasions. Almost no NO was observed at night, and daytime concentrations were in large excess when compared with the few other places where sustained daytime NO has been observed (Houston, Texas, in Geyer et al., 2003; the Gulf of Maine in Osthoff et al., 2006). Consequently, the concentrations of ClNO formed were much lower than might have been expected, considering the high chloride loadings.
2 Methods
2.1 Field campaign and sampling site
The field study was carried out at the Centre for Atmospheric Sciences at the Indian Institute of Technology in New Delhi (IITD; 28.54 N, 77.19 E) during January and February 2019. Measurements were taken from 11 January–5 February. Instruments were installed in a temperature-controlled fourth-floor laboratory.
The site is surrounded by a mixture of residential, commercial, and educational buildings. It is situated in the IITD campus, which also contains a number of green spaces. Delhi's outer ring road is located around 80 m to the north of the site, and a larger arterial road can be found around 1 km ESE of the site. The site is a representative background urban site. Measurements took place during the winter season, with temperatures ranging from around 10 C during the coolest night to 30 C on the warmest day. Relative humidity ranged from 30 % to 100 %. More detail on the campaign site itself and the aerosol- and gas-phase instrumentation can be found in other publications from this campaign (Lalchandani et al., 2021; Rai et al., 2020; N. Singh et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2020; Kumar et al., 2022).
Figure 1
Map of the field site location at the Indian Institute of Technology in Delhi. (Map data © OpenStreetMap 2023. Distributed under the Open Data Commons Open Database License (OdbL) v1.0.)
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
2.2 The FIGAERO-CIMSA high-resolution iodide adduct chemical ionisation mass spectrometer with a filter inlet for particles and gases (FIGAERO-CIMS; Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014; Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) was used to measure NO, ClNO, and oxygenated organic compounds. This method uses the negative iodide ion (I) as a reagent, which is produced by passing a dry nitrogen flow (1.5 L min) over a methyl iodide permeation tube, followed by an X-ray ioniser. This ionised ion flow interacts with incoming sample air in the ion molecular region (IMR), which is kept at 250 mbar, creating charged products that are identified as clusters containing I in the time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The FIGAERO inlet allows the gas phase to be sampled, while simultaneously collecting particles on a Teflon filter (Pall Corporation, Zefluor; 2 m pore size and 25 mm diameter). This filter was exposed to a sample airflow of 2 L min for approximately 3 min, before being moved into the desorption position at the instrument inlet. In this position, it was heated gradually from room temperature to 200 C, using a dry nitrogen flow at 2 L min, before being held at 200 C for 20 min and then cooled back down to room temperature over the course of 15 min. During the heating process, compounds that vaporise at temperatures below 200 C desorb from the filter, with the quantity of each compound growing as the temperature increases. The signal then peaks at the temperature , which differs for each compound . The temperature at which the maximum amount of a compound desorbs from the filter is related to the compound's volatility (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014; Thornton et al., 2020). The total signal for each compound from each heating event was found by integrating the signal from the beginning of the heating period to the beginning of the cooling period.
Between particle-phase desorption periods, the gas phase was sampled directly by the FIGAERO-CIMS for approximately 20 min. For this study, these 20 min periods have been averaged, providing averaged data points at a frequency of one every 60–90 min while the instrument was running. Air samples were drawn at 3.5 L min through the inlet, approximately 2 L min of which entered the IMR, with the rest being included only to reduce residence time and thus pumped away. The NO and ClNO ions were observed clustered, with I at 235 amu ( 235) and 208, respectively (Slusher et al., 2004; Kercher et al., 2009).
Background measurements were carried out 26 times for the particle phase and 6 times for the gas phase throughout the campaign. For the particle phase, a clean, pre-heated Teflon filter (Pall Corporation, Zefluor; 2 m pore size and 25 mm diameter) was inserted into the nitrogen flow, and the standard heating procedure described above was carried out. The results from these gave an indication of the instrument background, and the integrated signal for each compound was subtracted from the integrated signal for each particle-phase measurement. In the gas phase, zero-air gas was passed directly into the inlet and the background was measured.
Particle-phase sampling for the FIGAERO-CIMS was conducted via a in. (1.27 cm) outer diameter (0.35 in. (0.889 cm) inner diameter) stainless steel tube of 1.5 m length (2 L min; 2.8 s residence time), and gas-phase sampling was done via a in. (0.635 cm) outer diameter (0.2 in. (0.508 cm) inner diameter) perfluoroalkoxy (PFA) Teflon tube of around 2 m length (2 L min; 1.2 s residence time).
Direct calibrations for NO and ClNO were not carried out in the field. The method used to quantify the FIGAERO-CIMS signal for these compounds is detailed in Sect. S1 and Figs. S1 and S2 in the Supplement.
2.3 Other instrumentation
An aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS; Aerodyne Research Inc., Billerica, MA, USA) was used to quantify aerosol chloride, nitrate, ammonium, sulfate, and organic concentrations. The instrument set-up for this campaign has been described in detail elsewhere (Kumar et al., 2022). In brief, ambient air was sampled through an aerodynamic lens that limits sampling to particulate matter with a diameter smaller than 1 m (PM). Aerosol particles within the beam are flash vaporised at 600 C, and the resulting vapours are ionised using electron impact ionisation. Ionised fragments pass into the time-of-flight mass spectrometer chamber and are detected using a multi-channel plate (MCP) detector. This method can provide a quantitative measure of each species' concentration (in g m). Ionisation efficiency calibrations were carried out before and after the campaign, using 300 nm ammonium nitrate particles. More information on this instrument's operation during this campaign has been reported by Kumar et al. (2022).
NO measurements were carried out using a Serinus 40 Oxides of Nitrogen (NO) analyser (ECOTECH Pty Ltd, Australia). This instrument was calibrated at multiple concentration levels, using the calibrator and standard gas cylinder before and after the campaign. The limit of detection was around 0.4 ppbv. A scanning mobility particle sizer (SMPS; GRIMM Aerosol Technik) provided size-binned measurements of the dry fine aerosol number concentration between 19 nm and 1 m. A proton transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometer (PTR-ToF-MS; Ionicon Analytik GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria) was used to measure the larger VOCs, and smaller VOCs were observed using an airmoVOC C2C6 analyser, model A22022 (CHROMATOTEC®, France).
Sampling for the NO analyser, O analyser (Model 202 Ozone Monitor™; 2B Technologies), and SMPS was conducted via a 6 mm inner diameter stainless steel inlet of 3 m length, with an ambient particulate matter (APM) cyclone (BGI, Mesa Labs, Inc., Lakewood, CO, USA) installed to remove larger particles (Kumar et al., 2022). The inlets extended around 1.5 m horizontally from the building's NNW side, around 12 m above the ground. Global radiation was measured on the roof of the building, and other meteorological parameters including temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and wind direction were supplied by the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD). The measurement location for these was Indira Gandhi International Airport, which is situated approximately 8 km to the west of our field site.
2.4 Zero-dimensional chemical box model
A simple 0-dimensional (0-D) chemical box model was constructed in order to investigate the relative influence of NO sources and sinks. The model was used to calculate concentrations of NO and NO, based on values in the previous step, with a time step of 0.04 s and a spin-up period of 24 h. The reactions included in the model are outlined in Table S1 (Brown et al., 2003; Yan et al., 2019).
Here, corresponds to the reaction rate constant of each individual volatile organic compound (VOC; in s) and [VOC] to the concentration of the VOC, as measured by the PTR. The heterogeneous reaction rates for NO and NO at particle surfaces (R6 and R7 in the Supplement) rely on and , the average molecular speed of an NO or NO molecule (), the uptake coefficients for NO or NO ( and , respectively), and the available aerosol surface area (). These last two aspects are outlined in more detail in the Supplement. The molecular speeds were calculated for each species using Eq. (1) (Morgan et al., 2015), where is Boltzmann's constant ( m kg s K), represents the temperature in Kelvin, and is the molecular weight.
1 Box model results were compared with results from a simple steady-state approach. Using the steady-state approximation, it was possible to calculate NO concentrations using Eq. (2) and NO concentrations using Eq. (3) (Osthoff et al., 2006; Brown et al., 2005). Here, square brackets denote the concentration of the respective compound (in molec. cm). Calculated concentrations of both species were found to agree closely with results from the box model, indicating that the steady-state approximation is reasonable in this case. Therefore, the simpler steady-state approach was used for the results presented here.
Time series data of NO, NO, O, VOCs, global radiation, temperature, and wet particle surface area are used as direct inputs for Reactions (R1)–(R7) (see the Supplement). The chemical compositions of VOCs included in the model were CH, CH, CH, CH, CH, CH, CH, CH, CH, CH, and CH, which are all common urban VOCs that were observed in Delhi by the PTR. Measurements were not available for some of the more abundant VOCs in Delhi, such as methanol and acetone (Tripathi et al., 2022), and as such, the magnitude of the VOC sink is likely an underestimate. Nevertheless, this sink was minimal compared with the NO loss via interaction with NO and photolysis. This underestimate is therefore unlikely to result in a substantial impact on the estimated NO concentration. This model does not account for effects due to dilution, mixing, or other atmospheric dynamics. However, much of this will already be accounted for due to changes in the input parameters (NO, NO, O, and VOCs). More details about the calculation of various input parameters can be found in the Supplement. The planetary boundary layer height (PBLH) displayed in Fig. 2 and the friction velocity () were obtained from the Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem (READY; Rolph et al., 2017) website and was available at 3 h resolution.
Figure 2
Full campaign time series of key species and meteorological parameters. Grey and white backgrounds represent nighttime and daytime, respectively.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The campaign-averaged diel cycles were used for each input parameter. These diel averages for each compound were constructed by binning all measurements according to the time at which they were taken and calculating the mean for each hour of the day across the whole campaign.
2.5 The Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM)The F0AM model (Wolfe et al., 2016) is a 0-dimensional box model that can be used to simulate atmospheric chemistry systems. Here, we used the Master Chemical Mechanism (MCM) 3.3.1 chemistry, which was extended to include reactions for chlorine chemistry (Riedel et al., 2014). The latter included reactions of Cl with a series of VOCs and further reactions of their oxidation products.
Observed values of NO, CO, HONO, HNO, ClNO, ClONO, HOCl, Cl, and a series of VOCs (Fig. S4; Table S2) were used as model inputs. A 24 h diel cycle was modelled from 00:00 LT, with a 48 h spin-up period. The model produced one data point per hour. We used the MCM radiation model, which represents typical tropospheric conditions but does not reflect variability in the ozone column, surface albedo, aerosol optical depth, and clouds (Wolfe et al., 2016). The modelled diel cycle of O was used to scale the model's photolysis parameter by comparing the calculated O with observed values, which resulted in a photolysis scaling factor of 0.25.
The model was used to estimate the concentrations of the oxidants OH, NO, and O and to explore the relative importance of different oxidation compounds for oxidation of different VOCs, with varying contributions from Cl.
3 Results and discussion
3.1 Campaign overview
Figure 2 shows a time series of meteorological conditions and pollutant concentrations including NO, O, ClNO, NO and particulate organics, nitrate, and chloride during the field campaign in January and February 2019. During this period, the average daily maximum temperature was 22.7 C, with a range from 19.0 to 31.1 C, and the average nighttime minimum temperature was 12.0 C, ranging from 9.3 to 16.2 C. Temperatures were reasonably stable throughout the campaign, with a slight peak around 20 January. Relative humidities were higher at night, with an average low of 46.8 % during the day and high of 89.1 % at night. For these calculations, an average campaign sunrise time of 07:12 LT and sunset time of 17:53 LT was used to split the data into daytime and nighttime values.
Ozone concentrations reached an average of 43 ppbv during the day but were very low at night, with usually just 2 or 3 ppbv. Concentrations of NO, in contrast, were highest during the night, with a mean of 84 ppbv in comparison with 22 ppbv during the day. This is an unusual feature and is likely a consequence of more heavy-duty vehicles using the roads at night due to daytime restrictions (Tobler et al., 2020), combined with the low nighttime boundary layer height (Raj et al., 2021) and low nocturnal O levels limiting the conversion of NO to NO. Less diurnal difference was shown by NO, which averaged around 36 ppbv throughout the campaign, with small peaks in the morning and the evening. Particulate organic concentrations were very high during nighttime periods, regularly exceeding 200 g m, and reducing to an average of 61 g m during the day, primarily as a result of dilution caused by the change in the boundary layer height. Particulate chloride was enhanced in the early mornings, sometimes exceeding concentrations of 100 g m. These values are consistent with previous studies carried out in Delhi, which have shown the city to have among the highest levels of particulate chloride measured anywhere in the world (Gani et al., 2019; Gunthe et al., 2021).
Similarly high concentrations of NO and low concentrations of O at night have been observed in previous wintertime studies in Delhi. For example, Nelson et al. (2021, 2023) observed a very similar diel NO and O pattern to that displayed here in October–November 2018. In a year-long study, Sharma et al. (2021) demonstrated that these high nighttime NO concentrations last from September until May, while nighttime O was found to reach a minimum during November and December. Previous observations of aerosol concentrations are similarly consistent with our observations; during October and November 2018, Gunthe et al. (2021) observed aerosol concentrations with a strong nocturnal increase. Gani et al. (2019), in a long-term study, showed that this pattern holds throughout the winter (December–mid-February) and, more weakly, during the spring (February–March). The same study indicates that particulate chloride concentrations are highest during the winter and extremely low during the summer. We therefore anticipate that conclusions from our own study are likely to be most relevant in Delhi from October until March.
Figure 3
Median diel patterns during the period from 11 January–5 February 2019 for the key compounds explored in this study. (a) The median diel cycle of NO measured by the FIGAERO-CIMS, with the interquartile range shaded, alongside the NO and NO simulations from the 0-D box model. Error bars indicate a potential 30 % error in the estimated calibration constant. (b) Box plots showing the average NO concentrations throughout the campaign during the day and the night, as measured by the FIGAERO-CIMS, indicating that there is a distinct and consistent decrease in NO concentrations at night. (c) The observed median diel patterns of the precursor species NO, NO, and O are shown, with the interquartile ranges shaded. (d) The observed diel pattern of ClNO and particulate chloride throughout the campaign. The error bars here, as in panel (a), represent a 30 % potential calibration error.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
3.2 Unusual diel patterns in DelhiFigure 3a shows the average diel cycle of NO, as measured by the FIGAERO-CIMS from 11 January to 5 February 2019. The mean daytime concentration of NO during the measurement period was 21.9 pptv (parts per trillion by volume; standard deviation 29.3 pptv; median 16.0 pptv), compared with a nighttime mean of 4.4 (standard deviation 11.3 pptv; median 2.0 pptv; Fig. 3b). A simple 0-dimensional chemical box model was designed to investigate the driving factors behind this inverted NO pattern in more detail. This simple model successfully recreated the shape of the NO diurnal pattern observed in the FIGAERO-CIMS dataset (Fig. 3a) and indicated that NO is likely to follow a similar diel cycle.
Model results demonstrate that the diurnal NO and NO patterns were influenced most strongly by NO. Our observations show high nighttime concentrations of NO, which diminish considerably during the day (Fig. 3c). This pattern has been observed previously in Delhi and is generally attributed to the low, stable nocturnal boundary layer (Stewart et al., 2021) in combination with substantial NO sources, such as heavy-duty traffic and biomass burning, which are strongly present at night (Mishra et al., 2023). These nighttime NO levels deplete O to extremely low concentrations, leaving an excess of NO. Together, these effects ensure that during the night, the destruction of NO by NO is at its highest and its production, which requires O, is at its lowest. In contrast, the presence of O and NO during the day, coupled with little daytime NO (itself a result of both boundary layer dynamics and reactions with daytime O and peroxy radicals), results in higher daytime concentrations of NO and NO being sustained than would typically be possible.
Figure 4
The diel cycles of key oxidants and oxidation products in Delhi during the study period. (a) The diel cycle of four key oxidants, namely O, Cl, NO, and OH. The Cl concentration has been estimated from chlorine-containing species observed by the FIGAERO-CIMS (Sect. 2). Estimated concentrations of the other three oxidants are calculated using the Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) chemical box model (Wolfe et al., 2016; see Sect. 2). (b) The diel cycles of total N-containing organics in the gas and particle phases (blue), with selected compounds of CHNO (orange) and CHNO (black) also displayed in both the gas and particle phases. These two compounds, both associated with NO oxidation, are most prevalent during the day when the NO concentration peaks, while compounds associated with biomass burning are more prevalent at night (Fig. S6). The diel cycle of CHOCl, a known tracer of Cl chemistry, is shown in pink. These compounds were not calibrated, so here the percentage contribution of each compound or group of compounds towards the total organic signal is displayed on the axes.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
Our modelled NO concentrations are around a two-thirds lower than those observed. Combined with the observed mid-morning peak in ClNO (Fig. 1d), this is an indication that the nighttime production of both NO and ClNO continues to some extent in the residual layer, which is decoupled from the urban canopy layer in which our measurements take place. After sunrise and the ensuing atmospheric instability, the NO and ClNO from the nocturnal residual layer is likely incorporated into the daytime mixed layer and transported by turbulence downwards to the measurement system (Fig. S5). In this study, atmospheric mixing has been quantified using friction velocity () as a scale of the vertical transport of momentum (turbulence). It is presented here as 1 h means to smooth the stochastic nature of high-frequency turbulence and enable the diurnal trend in atmospheric mixing (which occurs over a period of hours) to be viewed more clearly. It can be seen in Fig. S5 that nighttime concentrations of ClNO are highest with greater atmospheric mixing, supporting the hypothesis that during periods of poor atmospheric mixing the measurement system (which is relatively close to the ground level) is decoupled from air masses above the urban canopy layer that contain higher concentrations of ClNO. Based on the discrepancy between the model and observations for NO (Fig. 3a) and on the difference between average nocturnal concentrations and the morning peak for ClNO (Fig. 3d), we estimate that an average of approximately pptv of NO and pptv of ClNO is mixed from the residual layer into the surface layer from above in the mornings, increasing the overall influence of both species during the day.
In addition to model results, oxidation products observed by the FIGAERO-CIMS provide evidence that Cl is an important oxidant in Delhi and that oxidation with NO takes place during the day. Chloroacetic acid (CHOCl) has previously been designated a tracer compound to indicate the presence of Cl oxidation (Le Breton et al., 2018; Priestley et al., 2018) and was observed here, exhibiting a strong diurnal pattern (Fig. 4b). Similarly, a number of individual compounds that have previously been observed in conjunction with the nighttime NO oxidation of monoterpenes were observed primarily as daytime species during this campaign, with the examples of CHNO (Ye et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2016) and CHNO (Ye et al., 2021; Boyd et al., 2015) displayed here (Fig. 4b). While it is also possible for these CHON compounds to originate from reactions during OH-initiated oxidation, the difference in the diurnal cycle here from that observed in other locations indicates a contribution from daytime NO. The nitrogen-containing organic compounds (e.g. CHON) that increased most strongly during the night were all found to be associated with primary biomass burning emissions (Mishra et al., 2023) and not oxidation products (Fig. S6). The overall contribution of CHON as a fraction of total organics increased slightly during daylight hours (Fig. 4b), particularly in the gas phase, while results from other parts of the world have typically found the contribution of CHON to increase slightly at night as a result of NO oxidation (Ye et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2019). In addition, it is possible for CHON compounds present during the night to have originated from reactions during OH-initiated oxidation. Daytime peaks in NO oxidation products will likely result from both daytime oxidation by NO within the surface layer and the mixing down of products from nocturnal oxidation taking place within the elevated residual layer. Given that the other important urban oxidants, OH and O, in addition to Cl, also display daytime maxima, all four key oxidants can be considered daytime species in this environment. As a corollary, there are no significant nocturnal oxidants in the surface layer.
Figure 5
Relationships between nighttime ClNO, NO, and NO during the study period. (a) Average nocturnal concentrations of NO plotted against average nocturnal concentrations of NO for our campaign results from Delhi and from measurements in Beijing from 2020. The new 24 h WHO guideline for NO concentrations is displayed by the dashed grey line, with the calculated NO equivalent shown by the solid black line. (b) Relationship between nocturnal ClNO and NO. Colouring shows the average particulate chloride concentration, as measured by the AMS. The dashed red line shows the least squares regression line for the Delhi dataset, with 95 % confidence intervals shown in grey. The equation for the line is given by the equation . Data points from between 20:00 and 05:00 LT on the following morning are included.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
One of the consequences of this shift away from nighttime NO within the urban canopy layer is that very little oxidation from any oxidant takes place at the time when submicron particulate matter (PM) is at its most concentrated; our observations show that PM more than doubles from day to night (Fig. S7a). A previous investigation of the organic aerosol chemical speciation during this campaign, using positive matrix factorisation on the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) and extractive electrospray ionisation mass spectrometer (EESI) data, shows that factors associated with oxidation reactions are enhanced during the day in Delhi, while the particulate matter present during the night is the least oxidised (Kumar et al., 2022). The average oxygen to carbon () ratio of particulate matter during this campaign has been found to be unusually low, compared with a global dataset of FIGAERO-CIMS observations in different environments (Huang et al., 2023); the ratio of particulate matter observed by the CIMS during this campaign was 0.7, compared with values between 0.75 and 0.95 observed elsewhere. If the distribution of oxidants were to change, then this would likely increase the SOA mass in the region. Such a change could come about if nocturnal NO were to decrease, thereby increasing nocturnal concentrations of NO and NO and allowing larger quantities of ClNO, and therefore Cl radicals, to be produced.
3.3 The potential influence of changes to the diel patternFigure 5a shows the relationship between nighttime average NO and NO concentrations in Delhi. It can be seen here that as NO concentrations during the night decrease, the NO produced increases substantially. Data from this campaign are displayed alongside observations from Beijing, which were carried out during January 2020. The sampling site for the campaign in Beijing was in the west campus of the Beijing University of Chemical Technology (BUCT). Measurements were taken from the top floor of a five-storey building at a height of approximately 20 m. The location is comparable to that of the site in Delhi; it is influenced by local pollution sources including traffic, residential heating, and cooking emissions (Cai et al., 2022), and it can similarly be considered to be an urban background site. Similar to Delhi, Beijing is a polluted urban centre with a notable contribution from chloride in the particle phase, albeit around 17 times lower than Delhi, on average, based on observations presented here.
The concentrations of NO in Beijing display a more typical diel pattern, with higher values at night. Nighttime NO regularly exceeds 100 pptv in Beijing, while Delhi's value generally remains below 10 pptv. (In this analysis, nighttime averages are taken between 20:00 and 05:00 LT on the following morning in order to prevent residual influence from daytime processes.) The comparison between the two cities allows us to understand more about the impact of Delhi's unusual NO cycle on atmospheric chemistry. When the two cities have some overlap in nighttime NO concentrations, the quantity of NO produced at night is roughly comparable. However, the majority of nights in Beijing have much lower NO concentrations than any observed in Delhi; at these lower concentrations, much more NO can be produced, in some cases reaching close to 1 ppbv. There is a larger spread in NO concentrations during nights with low NO because other factors such as the amount of available NO and O also have an impact on NO formation. It is important to note that the lower temperatures in Beijing (where the mean campaign temperature was around 3.4 C, compared with 16.8 C in Delhi) will contribute towards the higher NO concentrations.
There are two key reasons for the substantial difference in the nocturnal NO concentrations between the two cities. First, emissions inventories indicate that vehicular emissions of NO decrease by around 90 % during the night in Beijing (Jing et al., 2016), compared with a decrease of only around 40 % in Delhi (Biswal et al., 2023). Due to traffic regulations restricting the movement of heavy-duty vehicles during the day, there is increased movement of these vehicles at night in Delhi (Tiwari et al., 2015), leading to greater nocturnal NO emissions than can be found in other comparable cities. Second, the median boundary layer height during the night in winter in Beijing has been reported to be around 100 m (Yang et al., 2020), while data from READY during this campaign (Fig. 2) indicate a nocturnal boundary layer height of 50 m or even lower. As a result, comparable NO emissions would result in double the concentration, or even more, in Delhi, compared with Beijing. Together, these factors result in the high nocturnal NO concentrations in Delhi when compared with Beijing.
The World Health Organization (WHO) published new air quality guidelines in 2021 (World Health Organization, 2021), which include a 24 h guideline and annual thresholds of 25 and 10 g m ( and 5.3 ppbv), respectively, for NO. Our observations show that during the night in Delhi, NO makes up on average 64 % of NO (; Fig. S7b). Approximate nighttime NO equivalent thresholds of around 23.8 ppbv in 24 h or 9.4 ppbv annually can therefore be established. This NO equivalent threshold is displayed in Fig. 5a and can be used to separate the data into two regimes, with nights above the threshold being considered to be “high NO” and those below to be “low NO”. The majority of nights in Delhi fall within the high NO regime, while the majority of those in Beijing fall into the low NO regime. Within the high NO regime, the average NO concentration across both datasets is 4.1 pptv, while in the low NO regime, the average NO concentration per night is 220 pptv. The overlap between NO concentrations in the two cities suggests that it is possible for changes in environmental conditions to shift the atmosphere from one regime to the other; there were some nights during which high NO concentrations in Beijing suppressed the formation of NO, and there were some nights in Delhi during which low NO concentrations allowed more production of NO. These results suggest that if nighttime NO concentrations were to be reduced in line with WHO guidance, then there would likely be a substantial increase in the nighttime production of NO.
The relationship between nighttime NO and ClNO observations for both Delhi and Beijing can be seen in Fig. 5b. For a given concentration of particulate chloride, larger nighttime concentrations of NO result in the production of more ClNO, as it increases the number of interactions at the surface of chloride-containing particles. These two datasets together show that, as the ambient concentration of particle-phase chloride increases, this reaction is able to take place more readily, and the ratio of ClNO to NO also increases. This results in much higher quantities of ClNO being produced in Delhi, with its higher particulate chloride, for a given concentration of NO, compared to Beijing. A linear regression line was fitted to the log of the Delhi dataset to demonstrate this relationship, which has an of 0.58. This pattern indicates that if nighttime NO concentrations in Delhi were to increase to values as high as those found in Beijing, the high availability of particle-phase chloride could result in ClNO production being exponentially higher than it is at present. Following the current trend line, an increase in nighttime NO to 115 pptv – the log-weighted average from the Beijing dataset – would increase the ClNO concentrations in Delhi to an average of 1450 pptv, 2 orders of magnitude higher than the current log-weighted average of 14 pptv.
We used the F0AM box model (Wolfe et al., 2016; Riedel et al., 2014) to investigate the relative contributions of Cl and NO radicals as oxidants for two common VOCs, -pinene and toluene, under three simulated scenarios. In scenario 1, we used the average diel NO concentrations displayed in Fig. 3a as input parameters for the F0AM model. This represents the baseline case. Scenario 2 uses NO and O data from a case study day on 15 January 2019. This date was chosen as it includes the night that exhibited the lowest nighttime NO and highest O during the campaign, leading to the production of a comparatively large amount of ClNO, which peaked at 715 pptv. Data were extracted between 18:00 LT on 14 January and 18:00 LT on 15 January 2019, replicated, and concatenated to form a full diel cycle. This case study represents the most extreme example of the low NO regime observed during our measurement period. Finally, scenario 3 features NO and O input parameters that have been taken from the Beijing dataset displayed in Fig. 5 as a stand-in for a more conventional diel cycle in a similarly polluted city. Average sunrise and sunset times differed by only 11 and 13 min, respectively, between the two campaigns, which indicates that the timing of concentration changes is likely to be appropriate for the model. The NO and NO maxima and diel patterns are comparable to those observed in Punjab, north of Delhi (Meidan et al., 2022), indicating that they are conceivable for the region. The Beijing dataset was used here because the maximum O concentrations and sunrise and sunset times are more closely comparable with those in Delhi at this time of year. The concentration of ClNO was fixed at the beginning of the model run to the highest nighttime value in scenario 2 and to 1.45 ppbv in scenario 3, which has been calculated from the fit line in Fig. 5, based on measured NO concentrations in Beijing. The ClNO was then depleted throughout the model run by photolysis to create oxidising Cl radicals. Scenario 3 is not intended to be a prediction of future atmospheric chemistry in Delhi. Rather, it represents a highly idealised scenario that can be used to explore the potential ramifications of substantial changes to the NO and O cycle in the context of Delhi's polluted and chlorine-rich environment.
Figure 6
The reactivity of toluene and -pinene under three simulated scenarios. Panels (a)–(c) show the NO, NO, O, and ClNO concentrations for scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In all three cases, NO and NO values in the model are held to the measurements, as is O in scenarios 2 and 3. For ClNO, the initial value is fixed and evolves throughout the model run for scenarios 2 and 3. Panels (d)–(f) indicate the reactivity of -pinene in scenarios 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and panels (g)–(i) show the reactivity of toluene.
[Figure omitted. See PDF]
The results of these model runs are shown in Fig. 6. In scenario 1, which represents the current situation in Delhi, Cl is responsible for 12 % of the toluene oxidation, indicating that it is already a major oxidant in the city. No NO is produced during the night in this scenario, but as a result of its presence during the day, 25 % of the -pinene oxidation is initiated by NO. During scenario 2, the higher ClNO concentration results in almost a doubling of the proportion of toluene oxidised by Cl to 20 %. In addition, the slight increase in nighttime NO and O results in some nighttime oxidation of -pinene taking place. This indicates that nighttime oxidation is taking place in Delhi, although it is largely restricted to nights that fall within the low NO regime. In this case, NO is responsible for 31 % of the -pinene oxidation.
Scenario 3 shows a substantial increase in nighttime oxidation from NO and daytime oxidation from Cl, due to the large nocturnal concentration of O that is sustained alongside the lack of NO. Here, the large increase in nighttime NO production, coupled with the increase in VOC concentrations during the night, leads to NO becoming the key oxidant for -pinene, accounting for 82 % of its reactivity. Concerning the toluene reactivity, only 16 % is initiated by Cl in this case, which is largely due to the associated increase in OH oxidation. In fact, the Cl-initiated toluene reactivity in scenario 3 is almost double that of scenario 2.
4 ConclusionsThe analysis presented here demonstrates that the diel cycles of the typically nocturnal species NO and NO are inverted during the winter in Delhi's surface layer. This is due to the presence of large concentrations of NO during the night; which is the result of the nighttime compression of the boundary layer, coupled with large nighttime emissions of NO. This nocturnal NO depletes NO during the night and therefore results in both NO and NO consistently peaking during the day. This unique diel chemical pattern limits the formation of nighttime ClNO. Despite this constraint on ClNO formation, the extremely high particulate chloride loadings available in Delhi still result in enough Cl production for it to be an important atmospheric oxidant. Model simulations carried out here using the F0AM model demonstrate that the role of Cl as an oxidant of toluene could be more than 10 times higher if the diel cycle of NO were more representative of that observed in comparable urban atmospheres such as Beijing. Similarly, the role of NO as an oxidant of -pinene was shown to be around 30 times lower in Delhi than it would be if the NO pattern were more typical. This is a particularly significant difference from the majority of urban centres, as NO would otherwise be the only oxidant that is most prominent during the night, when the concentration of particulate matter is at its highest.
A number of clean-air policies, including the latest update to the WHO guidelines on ambient air pollution (World Health Organization, 2021), emphasise the control of NO pollution in urban environments. This study highlights the complexity of atmospheric chemistry in a highly polluted urban environment and indicates that it is important to monitor the impacts of changes to specific species. Given the delicate chemical balance in Delhi's winter atmosphere, there is potential for significant changes in nighttime NO pollution to result in increased production of NO and NO in the surface layer. Such a change could be initiated by, for example, a reduction in nocturnal vehicle emissions. Our results indicate that both NO- and Cl-initiated oxidation could be substantially increased if the diurnal cycle for NO in Delhi were more representative of that seen in other major cities; this would increase the formation of SOA and therefore worsen urban haze. We strongly recommend careful monitoring of NO, O, and particulate chloride levels in Delhi, as there is potential for disruption to the NO cycle. It is important for more research to be undertaken into this problem in order to understand the potential ramifications in more depth. Given the importance of boundary layer dynamics for pollutant concentrations, and the potential influence of NO and ClNO formation in the residual layer, we would recommend that future projects in Delhi incorporate a vertical component. This could include measurements being made at different heights or vertical box modelling, which would contribute substantially towards a more complete understanding of the processes explored here.
Data availability
Data referenced in this study are available in the
Bolin Centre Database (
The supplement related to this article is available online at:
Author contributions
The concept for this paper was established by SLH and CM, with input from DMB, JT, UB, ASHP, and SNT. The investigation and measurements were carried out by SLH, VK, DSW, SM, NR, AS, DG, FZ, YL, WN, YL, WM, CY, KRD, and CM. MK, UB, ASHP, SNT, and CM acquired funding for this project. The writing was carried out by SLH. Reviewing and editing was undertaken with input from all co-authors.
Competing interests
At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.
Disclaimer
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Financial support
This research has been supported by the Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse (grant no. 2017.0165), the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), Government of India (grant no. AQM/Source apportionment_EPC Project/2017), the SDC Clean Air Project in India (grant no. 7F-10093.01.04), and the Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (grant nos. 2000021_169787, P2EZP2_181599, and PZPGP2_201992).
Review statement
This paper was edited by Lea Hildebrandt Ruiz and reviewed by two anonymous referees.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Atmospheric pollution in urban regions is highly influenced by oxidants due to their important role in the formation of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) and smog. These include the nitrate radical (NO
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details










1 Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
2 Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
3 Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland; now at: Institut National de l'Environnement Industriel et des Risques (INERIS), Parc Technologique ALATA, 60550 Vemeuil-en-Halatte, France
4 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
5 Geosciences Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India
6 Geosciences Division, Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India; now at: Department of Environmental Studies, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India
7 Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
8 Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
9 Aerosol and Haze Laboratory, Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China
10 Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
11 Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
12 Aerosol and Haze Laboratory, Beijing Advanced Innovation Centre for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China; Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China; Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
13 Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India; Department of Sustainable Energy Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Kanpur, India
14 Department of Environmental Science, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; Bolin Centre for Climate Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden; now at: Laboratory of Atmospheric Chemistry, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland