It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
In this work, we present UV completions of the recently proposed number-changing Co-SIMP freeze-out mechanism. In contrast to the standard cannibalistic-type dark matter picture that occurs entirely in the dark sector, the 3 → 2 process setting the relic abundance in this case requires one Standard Model particle in the initial and final states. This prevents the dark sector from overheating and leads to rich experimental signatures. We generate the Co-SIMP interaction with a dark sector consisting of two scalars, with the mediator coupling to either nucleons or electrons. In either case, the dark matter candidate is naturally light : nucleophilic interactions favor the sub-GeV mass range and leptophilic interactions favor the sub-MeV mass range. Viable thermal models in these lighter mass regimes are particularly intriguing to study at this time, as new developments in low-threshold detector technologies will begin probing this region of parameter space. While particles in the sub-MeV regime can potentially impact light element formation and CMB decoupling, we show that a late-time phase transition opens up large fractions of parameter space. These thermal light dark matter models can instead be tested with dedicated experiments. We discuss the viable parameter space in each scenario in light of the current sensitivity of various experimental probes and projected future reach.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Harvard University, Department of Physics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X); Stony Brook University, C.N. Yang Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stony Brook, USA (GRID:grid.36425.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2216 9681)
2 University of Liverpool, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Liverpool, UK (GRID:grid.10025.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8470); Stockholm University, AlbaNova, The Oskar Klein Centre, Department of Physics, Stockholm, Sweden (GRID:grid.10548.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9377)
3 Harvard University, Department of Physics, Cambridge, USA (GRID:grid.38142.3c) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 754X); University of California, Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics, Department of Physics, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.47840.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2181 7878); Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Theoretical Physics Group, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)
4 Johns Hopkins University, William H. Miller III Department of Physics and Astronomy, Baltimore, USA (GRID:grid.21107.35) (ISNI:0000 0001 2171 9311)