It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Dynamic color change has evolved multiple times, with a physiological basis that has been repeatedly linked to dermal photoreception via the study of excised skin preparations. Despite the widespread prevalence of dermal photoreception, both its physiology and its function in regulating color change remain poorly understood. By examining the morphology, physiology, and optics of dermal photoreception in hogfish (Lachnolaimus maximus), we describe a cellular mechanism in which chromatophore pigment activity (i.e., dispersion and aggregation) alters the transmitted light striking SWS1 receptors in the skin. When dispersed, chromatophore pigment selectively absorbs the short-wavelength light required to activate the skin’s SWS1 opsin, which we localized to a morphologically specialized population of putative dermal photoreceptors. As SWS1 is nested beneath chromatophores and thus subject to light changes from pigment activity, one possible function of dermal photoreception in hogfish is to monitor chromatophores to detect information about color change performance. This framework of sensory feedback provides insight into the significance of dermal photoreception among color-changing animals.
Despite its prevalence, the function of dermal photoreception in color-changing animals remains poorly understood. Here, the authors describe an optical mechanism in hogfish skin, suggesting that one function is to obtain sensory feedback about color change performance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Florida International University, Institute of the Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, North Miami, USA (GRID:grid.65456.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2110 1845); Duke University, Biology Department, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961); University of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Biology and Marine Biology, Wilmington, USA (GRID:grid.217197.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9813 0452)
2 Torch Technologies, Shalimar, USA (GRID:grid.456287.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0507 0307); Air Force Research Laboratory/RWTCA, Eglin Air Force Base, USA (GRID:grid.461677.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 0632 0304)
3 University of North Carolina Wilmington, Department of Biology and Marine Biology, Wilmington, USA (GRID:grid.217197.b) (ISNI:0000 0000 9813 0452)
4 Duke University, Biology Department, Durham, USA (GRID:grid.26009.3d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7961)
5 Florida Institute of Technology, College of Engineering and Science, Melbourne, USA (GRID:grid.255966.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2229 7296)
6 Florida International University, Institute of the Environment, Department of Biological Sciences, North Miami, USA (GRID:grid.65456.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2110 1845); National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Washington, USA (GRID:grid.453560.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2192 7591)