Exhaled Nitric Oxide and Pulmonary Oxygen Toxicity Susceptibility

Abstract

Individual susceptibility to pulmonary oxygen toxicity (PO₂tox) is highly variable and currently lacks a reliable biomarker for predicting pulmonary hyperoxic stress. As nitric oxide (NO) is involved in many respiratory system processes and functions, we aimed to determine if expired nitric oxide (F_ENO) levels can provide an indication of PO₂tox susceptibility in humans. Eight U.S. Navy-trained divers volunteered as subjects. The hyperoxic exposures consisted of six- and eight-hour hyperbaric chamber dives conducted on consecutive days in which subjects breathed 100% oxygen at 202.65 kPa. Subjects’ individual variability in pulmonary function and F_ENO was measured twice daily over five days and compared with their post-dive values to assess susceptibility to PO₂tox. Only subjects who showed no decrements in pulmonary function following the six-hour exposure conducted the eight-hour dive. F_ENO decreased by 55% immediately following the six-hour oxygen exposure (n = 8, p < 0.0001) and by 63% following the eight-hour exposure (n = 4, p < 0.0001). Four subjects showed significant decreases in pulmonary function immediately following the six-hour exposure. These subjects had the lowest baseline F_ENO, had the lowest post-dive F_ENO, and had clinical symptoms of PO₂tox. Individuals with low F_ENO were the first to develop PO₂tox symptoms and deficits in pulmonary function from the hyperoxic exposures. These data suggest that endogenous levels of NO in the lungs may protect against the development of PO₂tox.

1. Introduction

Pulmonary oxygen toxicity (PO₂tox) results from prolonged exposure to a hyperoxic atmosphere, with the severity of symptoms increasing progressively with elevation of the inspired oxygen partial pressure (PiO₂) and the duration of exposure [1]. Symptoms of PO₂tox include chest pain, tightness, cough, and substernal distress that may coincide with decreases in pulmonary function, specifically, a reduction in forced vital capacity (FVC) and alveolar diffusion capacity (D_LCO) [1,2]. The toxic effects of oxygen are a concern for military and technical divers conducting prolonged multiday dives using oxygen rebreathers and for patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy or aggressive oxygen therapy for respiratory insufficiency at normobaric pressure. While there are theoretical models that predict the expected level of pulmonary function deficit because of prolonged exposure to raised PiO₂ that are based upon the expected decline in FVC, there is considerable individual variation in susceptibility to a uniform degree of pulmonary oxygen poisoning [3,4,5]. Currently, there are no methods to predict individual susceptibility to PO₂tox. Furthermore, a sensitive non-invasive biomarker that can detect changes in lung pathology at an early stage in the oxygen toxicity process has remained elusive.

Expired nitric oxide (F_ENO) measurements have been studied as an exhaled marker of airway inflammation in a variety of lung diseases, including asthma, lung cancer, bacterial pneumonia, pulmonary fibrosis, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis [6,7]. Nitric oxide (NO) in expired air is derived from nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity from various cellular sources, including neutrophils, alveolar type-II cells, endothelial cells, and airway cells, as well as from non-enzymatic sources such as s-nitrosothiols and nitrite protonation [6,8]. All three types of NOS (neuronal [nNOS], inducible [iNOS], and endothelium [eNOS]) have been identified in the human lung [9]. Endogenous NO in the lungs is thought to play an important role in host immune defenses by maintaining ciliary function, preventing the growth of bacteria and replication of viruses, modulating airway reactivity, facilitating surfactant production in the alveoli, and regulating inflammation and local blood flow in the lung [7,9].

The role of NO in the development or protection from O₂ toxicity has been investigated in animal studies by several investigators [10,11] to better understand the roles of oxidative and nitrosative stress on hyperoxia-induced cell damage and acute lung injury [12,13]. Garat et al. [10] found that the survival time of hyperoxic rats treated with the NOS inhibitor NG-Nitroarginine Methyl Ester (L-NAME) was reduced compared to a hyperoxic control group, suggesting a protective effect of endogenous NO during 100% O₂ breathing at normobaric pressure. Investigators at Duke University have shown that NO production may either exacerbate or mitigate the toxic effects of oxygen, depending on the NOS isoform that produces it [11,12]. These animal studies raise the intriguing possibility that individual variability in NO production in the lung may explain the large variability in individual susceptibility to PO₂tox. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine if F_ENO levels could provide an indication of PO₂tox susceptibility in humans.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Subjects

The current study investigated individual differences to hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) stress using a small group of healthy, well-trained divers, rather than focusing on group mean changes in a larger, more diverse subject population. Consequently, the subject population was limited to qualified U.S. Navy-trained divers who were fit to dive and familiar with the signs and symptoms of both pulmonary and central nervous system (CNS) oxygen toxicity. Subjects were drawn from a convenience sample of U.S. Navy-trained divers (male or female) that were stationed at or worked at the Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory (NSMRL). During the informed consent process, all divers were reminded of the risks of pulmonary and CNS oxygen toxicity that could result from their participation in the study. Eight male U.S. Navy-trained divers aged 21–55 years (mean = 36.4 years), weighing 74.1–113.2 kg (mean = 91.8 kg), and with body stature ranging from 165–180 cm (mean = 174 cm) participated as subjects after signing the informed consent. The subject population consisted of enlisted divers and undersea medical officers, as well as civilian U.S. Navy-trained divers. All had normal lung function, were non-smokers, and abstained from all other diving activities for the duration of the study.

2.2. Study Design and Hyperbaric Oxygen Exposure Profile

The study protocol was approved by the NSMRL Institutional Review Board in compliance with all applicable federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects. The HBO exposures consisted of six-hour and eight-hour dry resting trials, breathing 100% humidified O₂ at 202.65 kPa (2 ATA) in a hyperbaric chamber. The six- and eight-hour dives were performed on consecutive days. Pulmonary function and F_ENO were measured immediately prior to each dive, between 10- and 60-min post-dive, and then daily for at least 3 days after the dive, until complete recovery of pulmonary function. Only subjects who showed no decrements in pulmonary function following the 6 h exposure conducted the 8 h dive. Based on previous studies, the level of pulmonary oxygen toxicity induced by 6 h of breathing 100% O₂ at 2 ATA was predicted to cause a temporary decrease in FVC of between 4 and 6 percent in 50% of the subjects [2,3,4,14]. Extending the dive to 8 h increased the predicted decrement in FVC to 8% in 50% of the subjects [14]. Both dives were below the CNS oxygen toxicity limit (previous studies have shown no evidence of CNS oxygen toxicity in divers exposed to 2 ATA of oxygen for up to 12 h [3]). Due to the level of uncertainty in these predictions, it was felt that the current approach of conducting two dives with increasing length of oxygen exposure would permit measurable but fully reversible levels of pulmonary oxygen toxicity in our subject population, without exposing particularly susceptible individuals to an overly long HBO exposure.

During each dive, an inside tender who was not on oxygen accompanied the diver (subject). The hyperbaric oxygen exposure profiles were carefully selected to elicit a mild but reversible level of pulmonary oxygen toxicity in the majority of subjects while also keeping the risk of a seizure from CNS oxygen toxicity to a minimum. A single 15 min air break was incorporated during the midpoint of each HBO exposure, during which the subjects ate a low-nitrate/-nitrite lunch. The total bottom time of the dive was adjusted for the 15 min air break to ensure that the total time breathing 100% oxygen at 2 ATA was either 6 or 8 h. The initial six-hour HBO exposures were conducted in two teams of three and one team of two divers. All the dives were conducted at the same time of day (initial press between 07:10 and 08:36). Compression and decompression rates were 18.3 msw/min (60 fsw/min) and 9.1 msw/min (30 fsw/min), respectively.

Control exposures were conducted on two of the subjects to determine if pulmonary function or F_ENO were significantly affected by breathing air at surface pressure in the hyperbaric chamber on the built-in breathing system for six or eight hours. One subject completed a six-hour air exposure, and the other subject completed an eight-hour air exposure. Both subjects completed the control exposures approximately four months after their oxygen exposures.

2.3. Pulmonary Function and Expired Nitric Oxide Measurements

Pulmonary function (FVC, forced inspiratory vital capacity [F_IVC], forced expiratory volume in 1 s [F_EV1]), the diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (D_LCO), and F_ENO baseline measurements were collected from each diver twice per day (morning—am, and afternoon—pm) for five consecutive days before conducting the HBO exposures. During each measurement session, subjects conducted three repetitions for each pulmonary function test, meaning that the test met the American Thoracic Society (ATS) standards for repeatability [15,16,17,18]. All pulmonary function tests were conducted on the VMAX Encore 22 Pulmonary Function Module (Viasys Healthcare Inc., Yorba Linda, CA, USA). F_ENO was measured using a chemiluminescence NO analyzer (Sievers NOA 280i, GE analytical instruments, Boulder, CO, USA). During each measurement session, F_ENO was measured at the following 5 expired flow rates: 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mL/s. These were used to determine alveolar NO concentration (C_ANO) and maximum airway wall flux of NO (J’awNO) using a two-compartment model [19]. Exhaled flow rates for on-line F_ENO measurements were controlled by having the subject target the desired flow rate, presented on a computer screen, while expiring against a flow restrictor. Five different flow restrictors were used to achieve the different expired flow rates. At each expired flow rate, the mean value from at least three F_ENO measurements that conformed to the standardized procedures recommended by the American Thoracic Society for online F_ENO measurement [20] were taken during each measurement session and used in the analysis. The Sievers NO analyzer and VMAX Encore 22 Pulmonary Function Module were calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s procedures at least twice daily (morning and afternoon) before each measurement session. During each measurement session, the subjects conducted the F_ENO measurements before the pulmonary function tests to avoid the potential influence of the spirometry measurements on F_ENO. Pre-dive measurements for NO and pulmonary function were taken during the two-hour period before the dive. Post-dive measurements of F_ENO were initiated 10 min after the dive had reached the surface. As D_LCO measurements were always conducted after the F_ENO measurements, subjects breathed ambient air for at least 20 to 30 min following the dives before conducting their first D_LCO measurement. Consequently, P_AO₂ levels were expected to be at normal levels during the pulmonary function test and, thus, no corrections were made to D_LCO for P_AO₂.

2.4. Data Analysis

A decrement in pulmonary function for an individual was defined as outside their normal variability if one or more of their pulmonary function tests (i.e., FVC, F_IVC, F_EV1, or D_LCO) fell more than two standard deviations (SD) below their mean baseline value for that test. A change in F_ENO was also considered outside normal variability if the change was greater than 2 SDs from the individual’s mean baseline F_ENO value. Intra-individual variability for F_ENO and the various pulmonary function tests were expressed as 2 × the coefficient of variation (CV), where CV = (SD/mean) × 100, to facilitate the comparison among individuals and between variables with different units and different means. All statistical analyses were carried out using Statistica software (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA). Analysis on the effect of time of day (am or pm) on F_ENO across all expired flow rates was performed using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA). Repeated measures ANOVA was also used to compare group mean changes in F_ENO, C_ANO, J’awNO_, and pulmonary function at the different time points. When significant main effects of time were observed, the Dunnett post hoc test was used to explore differences between baseline and post-dive values. The relationships between F_ENO levels and the percent changes in pulmonary function following the six-hour dive were evaluated using linear regression and the Pearson Product moment correlation coefficient. Significance was set at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Baseline individual means, 2 × the coefficient of variation (2 × SD/mean × 100%) for F_ENO (at 50 mL/s expired flow rate), and the different pulmonary function tests (i.e., FVC, F_IVC, D_LCO) that were derived from the twice daily measurements (am and pm) taken on five consecutive days (n = 20 data points per mean per subject for each pulmonary function test) are shown in the second column of Table 1, Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. The remaining columns in each table show the percent change in that variable from each individual’s mean baseline level following the HBO exposures. In each of the tables, the subject’s data are ordered from highest (top) to lowest (bottom) baseline F_ENO. Additional tables showing changes in D_LCO adjusted for Hb (D_LCO_adj), D_LCO adjusted for alveolar volume (D_LCO/VA), alveolar volume (V_A), and F_EV1 are presented in Appendix A (Table A1, Table A2, Table A3 and Table A4).

As shown in Table 1, there was a threefold range (19 to 59 ppb) in the baseline F_ENO between subjects. Analysis of the F_ENO baseline data using all expired flow rates indicated a significant time of day effect, with F_ENO on average 10% lower in the afternoon compared to morning (p < 0.001). There was, however, no difference detected between the pre-dive F_ENO taken on the morning before the six-hour dive and the baseline F_ENO (p = 0.9994). Immediately following the six-hour oxygen exposure, all eight subjects had significant decreases in F_ENO (i.e., values > 2 × CV less than their baseline), with the group mean change showing a 55% decrease (p < 0.0001). By the morning after the dive, F_ENO levels had returned to normal in the majority of divers (six out of eight).

The four subjects with the lowest baseline F_ENO and lowest post-dive F_ENO (subjects 2, 3, 4, and 9) had clinical symptoms of pulmonary O₂ toxicity and showed significant decreases in pulmonary function on one or more of the pulmonary function tests immediately following the six-hour exposure (see Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). The clinical symptoms reported included chest fullness/tightness, congestion, mild substernal burning, and tickling or cough on deep inhalation. Subjects 1, 5, 7, and 8, who had baseline F_ENO levels greater than the group mean of 34 ppb, showed no pulmonary function deficits or symptoms of pulmonary O₂ toxicity following the six-hour HBO exposure and, thus, conducted the eight-hour HBO exposure the following day. Immediately following the eight-hour dive, three of these subjects had pulmonary function deficits (see Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) and all four subjects showed greater decreases in F_ENO than following their six-hour dive (mean ± SD F_ENO post-dive 1 vs. post-dive 2 = 22.2 ± 3.4 ppb vs. 16.6 ± 2.7 ppb, respectively, n = 4, p < 0.01). Subject 5 had the highest baseline F_ENO and was the only subject who did not show symptoms of PO₂tox or a pulmonary function deficit following the HBO exposures.

During the three days following the dives, five subjects showed significant increases in F_ENO (see Table 1). However, the timing of these increases and the duration of the elevated F_ENO was variable among the subjects. Consequently, the group analysis did not reveal any statistically significant change in the mean F_ENO from the pre-dive baseline during recovery days one (p = 0.8642), two (p = 0.0579), or three (p = 0.3358).

The pulmonary function test that demonstrated the greatest number of significant decrements following the oxygen exposures was D_LCO (see Table 4). The three subjects with the lowest baseline F_ENO (subjects 4, 3, and 9) had the greatest relative decrements in D_LCO, which persisted for one to three days post-exposure. Subjects 1 and 8 also showed significant decreases in D_LCO during the recovery period. When D_LCO was corrected for V_A, all subjects except subject 5 showed significant decrements at some point during the recovery period (see Table A2 in Appendix A). Both D_LCO and D_LCO/VA showed a significant main effect of time (p < 0.05 and p < 0.01, respectively) that was predominantly due to lower values during the second day of recovery compared to baseline (see Table 4 and Table A2).

The relationship between the relative change in D_LCO immediately following the six-hour dive and the immediate pre- and post-dive levels of F_ENO is shown in Figure 1. Regression analysis of these data found that the relative change in D_LCO immediately post-dive was significantly related to the immediate post-dive F_ENO (r = 0.948, p < 0.001), as well as to the pre-dive F_ENO (r = 0.902, p < 0.01). Using the mean baseline F_ENO in the regression analysis instead of the pre-dive F_ENO slightly improved the relationship (r = 0.931, p < 0.001).

While some subjects had significant decrements in the spirometry tests following the dives, the group mean relative changes in the spirometry tests were on average smaller than those found for D_LCO. Immediately following the six-hour dive, F_IVC appeared to be more affected than FVC; however, neither F_IVC nor FVC showed a significant main effect of time following group analysis (p = 0.0658 and p = 0.2176, respectively).

The two-compartment model analysis of the F_ENO data showed a significant 58% decrease in J’awNO (mean ± SD, baseline vs. post-dive 1 = 1681 ± 747 pl/s vs. 709 ± 465 pl/s, p < 0.001), with no change in C_ANO (mean ± SD baseline vs. post-dive 1 = 2.9 ± 1.2 ppb vs. 2.6 ± 0.6 ppb; p = 0.995) immediately following dive 1. A comparison of pre- and post-exposure measurements for F_ENO and pulmonary function for the two subjects who conducted the surface control trials showed that all the dependent variables following the control exposure were within each individual’s normal daily variability.

4. Discussion

Traditionally, the “gold standard” for assessing PO₂tox has been to measure changes in pulmonary function using spirometry (i.e., FVC) or D_LCO. However, the sensitivity of these pulmonary function tests to assess PO₂tox susceptibility has been questioned [21,22], and more recent research has explored other components in exhaled breath as potential biomarkers of PO₂tox [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Since the initial discovery that NO was present in expired air [28], F_ENO has been one of the most widely studied exhaled breath biomarkers of pulmonary health. F_ENO increases significantly in a variety of inflammatory airway diseases and is now commonly used to diagnose and phenotype asthmatics [7]. It was thus originally hypothesized that F_ENO would increase following HBO exposure due to free oxygen radical initiation of inflammatory reactions in the lungs.

One of the first published papers on the effect of hyperoxia on F_ENO reported that F_ENO increased with exposure to normobaric hyperoxic gas mixtures [29]. However, the 10 min normobaric oxygen exposures in this early study were unlikely to result in inflammation of the lungs. The results of the study by Schmetterer et al. [29] are in direct contrast with our finding of a marked acute reduction in F_ENO following prolonged HBO exposures. One potential reason for the disparate results is that, at the time that Schmetterer et al. [29] performed their study, there was no standard method for measuring F_ENO. Since that time, it has become clear that F_ENO is highly dependent on the expired flow rate and, thus, the recommended guidelines for F_ENO measurements published by the ATS in 2005 [20] have since standardized expired flow rates at 50 mL/s using a flow resistor that also prevents contamination of the F_ENO measurement from the high levels of NO found in the nasal cavity. Although we did observe significant increases in F_ENO during the recovery days in five subjects, which may be reflective of a delayed inflammatory reaction in the lungs, only one of these subjects (subject 9) exhibited consistent decrements in pulmonary function during all three recovery days that was concomitant with abnormally elevated F_ENO levels.

A second main finding from our study is that the duration of the HBO exposure affected the relative magnitude of the post-dive decrease in F_ENO, with the eight-hour HBO dive resulting in significantly lower post-dive F_ENO levels than the six-hour HBO exposure. This finding implies that the magnitude of the temporary F_ENO decrease following the HBO exposures may be dose dependent. Since conducting these pilot HBO dives in 2007, we have conducted a wide variety of dry human hyperoxic exposures with varying inspired oxygen partial pressures and exposure durations to determine if the F_ENO decreases found in the current study follow a predictable dose–response relationship. Findings from these studies have been presented to the undersea and hyperbaric medical and research community at various scientific forums [30,31,32] and were summarized in preliminary form by Fothergill and Weathersby [33]. This study showed that the relative change in F_ENO following dry resting hyperoxic exposure follows an exponential decline that is tightly related to the hyperoxic dose of the preceding exposure [33]. In the statistical model of the changes in F_ENO with varying HBO exposures, Fothergill and Weathersby [33] used the following expression to define the hyperoxic dose of the HBO dives based upon the inspired partial pressure of the oxygen breathed (PiO₂) and the duration of the exposure:

Hyperoxic Dose (ATA.min) = [PiO₂ (ATA) × Exposure Duration (min)] − [0.21 × Exposure Duration (min)] (1)

Other investigators have also reported acute decreases in F_ENO levels following HBO exposures [34,35,36,37,38,39,40]; however, the oxygen dose involved in these studies has rarely been great enough to induce changes in lung function or PO₂tox symptoms noticeable enough to determine if the F_ENO changes were related to PO₂tox susceptibility. Our study is, therefore, somewhat unique, in that we were able to observe symptoms of PO₂tox and measure significant decreases in lung function in some of our subjects, and then relate them to the observed changes in F_ENO. Based upon our observations, we found that those individuals who had the lowest pre-dive F_ENO levels exhibited the lowest post-dive F_ENO levels and were most susceptible to PO₂tox.

This significant linear relationship between the pre-dive baseline levels of F_ENO and the relative decrease in D_LCO measured immediately post-dive should be taken with caution when interpreting the effects of HBO exposure on PO₂tox susceptibility. In a more recent study, in which healthy U.S. Navy-trained divers were exposed to 6.5 h of 100% O₂ at 2.0 ATA [27], one subject, who aborted the dive early due to severe PO₂tox symptoms, was found to have a 15% increase in D_LCO immediately post-dive compared to his pre-dive base line [41]. Concomitant with the increase in D_LCO was a 125% increase in total airway resistance and a 35% increase in proximal airway resistance (as measured using an impulse oscillometry methodology) [41]. We surmise that the elevated D_LCO post-dive for this subject was an artifact caused by the increase in pulmonary resistance that resulted in a large negative interpulmonary pressure being generated during the fast inspiratory maneuver required to perform the D_LCO measurement. The negative interpulmonary pressure could result in increased blood volume entering the lung before the D_LCO breath-hold maneuver, raising the potential sink for the inhaled carbon monoxide gas mixture and artifactually raising the D_LCO level. Therefore, we hypothesize that subjects who are particularly susceptible to PO₂tox might experience a narrowing of the airways, possibly due to loss of normal airway tone.

Acute changes in airway diameter can be evoked by increases in cholinergic nerve activity or withdrawal of nitrergic neural activity [42]. Interestingly, noncholinergic neurotransmitters such as NO are thought to control human airway smooth muscle and normal airway tone via nitrergic parasympathetic nerves [42]. Thus, factors that compromise normal nitrergic parasympathetic control of airway tone, such as reduced levels of NO, would cause narrowing of the airways. The acute post-dive increase in airway resistance seen in the above PO₂tox case was concomitant with an extremely low post-dive F_ENO of 3.5 ppb [41]. This is consistent with a neurogenic PO₂tox response rather than an inflammatory reaction to the HBO exposure.

Although our study was not designed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms responsible for the reduction in F_ENO with HBO exposure, our results are consistent with the observation from previous animal work [10,43] that suggests that endogenous levels of NO may serve to protect the lung from hyperoxic lung injury [43]. Based upon our current findings, we suspect that, once F_ENO levels fall below a critical level, the antioxidant defense and other processes in the lung that depend on NO become overwhelmed by the hyperoxic stress, resulting in changes in lung function and symptoms of PO₂tox. However, as discussed in a review paper by Lui et al. [44], the role of the various NOS isoforms in the generation of NO in the face of hyperoxic stress and the impact of NO in the pathogenesis of acute lung injury is still under debate.

Several studies have attempted to ascertain the underlying mechanisms responsible for the decrease in F_ENO with HBO exposures [45,46,47]. The common thesis of these studies centers around the hypothesis that the decrease in F_ENO with hyperoxic exposures is due to decreased enzymatic generation of NO due to oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin (BH₄), which is an essential cofactor required for NO production by NOS [48]. Fismen et al. [45] found that increased O₂ concentrations reduced BH₄ levels in human endothelial cells in a dose-dependent manner, without directly affecting the NOS enzyme. Similarly, Hesthammer et al. [46] reported that BH₄ levels in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Although the latter study found that HUVEC NO production was also decreased following a 40 kPa O₂ exposure, a further decrease in HUVEC NO production was not observed when the oxygen exposure was increased to 60 kPa. In a follow up study by Hesthammer et al. [47], in which BH₄ was measured in venous blood samples of subjects exposed to 100% oxygen for 90 min at atmospheric pressure, both F_ENO and BH₄ significantly decreased when measured 10 min after the exposure. Although oxidation of BH₄ levels and its subsequent uncoupling/inhibitory effects of NOS on NO production appear to be a plausible reason for the reduced F_ENO with hyperoxic exposures; other mechanisms include the reaction of oxygen or superoxide radicals with NO to form peroxynitrite, which likely also contribute to the reduced F_ENO.

Study Strengths and Limitations

To our knowledge, this is the first study that combined measurements of F_ENO with traditional measures of pulmonary function in healthy divers to assess PO₂tox susceptibility following provocative HBO exposures that resulted in significant decrements in lung function. While the current study involved a small number of subjects, the study design incorporated multiple baseline and recovery measurements of F_ENO and pulmonary function to provide a robust indication of daily inter-individual variation and accurately define when these dependent variables fell significantly outside of the individual’s normal range, following the HBO exposure. The results clearly showed a wide individual variability in pulmonary function changes resulting from the HBO exposures, with half of our subject population showing minimal changes in lung function following the six-hour dive and the other half showing significant decreases that were more than two standard deviations below their normal day-to-day range. While this experimental design allowed us to analyze individual susceptibility to PO₂tox, the small n approach leaves group statistical analysis susceptible to type II errors from the large variability in individual responses to the HBO stress. However, given our primary aim, we felt the small n approach was ethically more defensible as a pilot study on individual PO₂tox susceptibility than a larger n study with limited individual pre-dive data but a higher power to detect group-level changes in pulmonary function post-dive.

An additional limitation of the current study is that only two subjects completed a control (normobaric air) condition, and that the study design was unblinded. This may have led to experimenter and subject bias regarding the expectation of pulmonary function decrements and PO₂tox symptoms following the HBO exposures. While performing the pulmonary function measurements in accordance with the ATS recommendations [15,16,17,18] helps to reduce this potential bias, most spirometry measurements are dependent upon the individual performing a maximal inspiratory and/or expiratory effort to determine if pulmonary function is affected by the HBO exposure. In contrast, measurements of F_ENO are conducted at a fixed expired flow rate and do not require maximum effort by the subject. F_ENO may thus offer an alternative or complementary assessment of pulmonary hyperoxic stress that is less prone to the subject’s effort than traditional spirometry measurements. While we acknowledged that there are many sources of NO in the lungs that can contribute to F_ENO, and that the underlying mechanistic role of NO in hyperoxic acute lung injury is still controversial, F_ENO may provide a useful noninvasive marker of the hyperbaric oxidative stress response of the lungs and lead to new insights into individual susceptibility to PO₂tox.

Author Contributions

D.M.F. was the principal investigator on the study, responsible for the conceptualization and study original design, funding acquisition, data collection, formal analysis, interpretation of the results, and manuscript preparation. J.W.G. was a co-investigator on the study who assisted in data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of the results. He also helped critically revise and approve the final content in the article. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Naval Submarine Medical Research Laboratory Institutional Review Board (protocol # NSMRL 2007.0003, approved 5 January 2007) and is in compliance with all applicable Federal regulations governing the protection of human subjects.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data from the current study are not publicly available due to government restrictions regarding data sharing, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and when requirements are met.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the U.S. Navy-trained divers who volunteered as subjects for this project. This work was presented at the 35th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Underwater and Baromedical Society in Aberdeen, Scotland, 25–28 August 2009, and was reported in abbreviated form in the book of abstracts and proceedings referenced below: Fothergill, D.M. and Gertner J. Exhaled nitric oxide (NOexp) measurements as a noninvasive marker of pulmonary oxygen toxicity susceptibility in humans. In Ross, J.A. (Ed). Proceedings of the 35th Annual Scientific Meeting of the European Underwater and Baromedical Society and British Hyperbaric association Annual Meeting, The British Hyperbaric Association, Aberdeen, Scotland, 25–28 August. pp. 94–99.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Figure and Tables

Figure 1. Relationship between the change in DLCO immediately following 6 h of breathing 100% oxygen at 202.65 kPa, and the immediate pre-dive FENO (circles) and post-dive FENO (squares). FENO was measured at 50 mL/s expired flow rate. The numbers next to the data points are subject number identifiers. Subjects 3, 4, and 9 all showed significant decrements in DLCO immediately post-dive (see Table 4). Regression equations for the solid line and dashed line are as follows: Percent change in DLCO = −0.2265 + 0.0043 × pre-dive FENO (r = 0.9018, p = 0.0022; r2 = 0.8132); Percent change in DLCO = −0.2286 + 0.0096 × post-dive FENO (r = 0.9485, p = 0.0003; r2 = 0.8996).

Table 1

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in F_ENO (expired flow rate = 50 mL/s) following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures. The subject data (rows) are ordered from highest to lowest baseline F_ENO. The baseline CV was determined from 10 measurements taken over 5 consecutive days before the dive (see Methods). Post-dive 1 and post-dive 2 measurements were taken between 15 min and 1 h post dive. Recovery measurements (Rec 1, 2, 3) were taken 1-, 2-, and 3-days post-dive.

Subject	Baseline FENO		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Meanppb	CV × 2 (%)
5	59	24%	−55%	−65%	−11%	0%	−6%
7	44	32%	−58%	−67%	+5%	0%	+22%
1	41	16%	−44%	−61%	−5.7%	+28%	−4%
8	38	30%	−46%	−60%	+14%	+76%	+36%
2	24	22%	−51%	NA	+37%	+3%	+15%
4	24	34%	−65%	NA	+9%	+40%	+10%
3	21	34%	−57%	NA	−5%	+2%	+4%
9	19	20%	−64%	NA	+55%	+34%	+66%
Mean	34 ppb	26.5%	−55% †	−63% †	+12%	+23%	+18%

† Group mean F_ENO significantly different from baseline (p < 0.0001). NA = Not applicable. Cells highlighted in grey indicate the time points where significant decrements in pulmonary function were observed (see Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4).

Table 2

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in FVC following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures.

Subject	Baseline FVC		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Mean(L BTPS)	CV × 2 (%)
5	5.61	4.9%	−0.8%	+1.9% *	−1.5%	−0.4%	−0.6%
7	4.22	6.3%	+1.9%	−0.5% *	+0.9%	−2.8%	−1.9%
1	5.99	2.2%	+4.3%	−2.8% *	−0.5%	−0.7%	−4.2%
8	4.91	6.8%	+4.7%	+3.3% *	+3.3%	−0.4%	−0.8%
2	5.58	7.0%	+3.6% *	NA	+2.9%	−1.6%	−1.3%
4	5.49	6.6%	−3.5% *	NA	−2.2%	−0.4%	−2.7%
3	4.78	5.3%	−3.1% *	NA	+1.3%	−5.2%	−0.8%
9	5.49	5.3%	−9.3% *	NA	−17.3% *	−7.7%	−5.4%
Mean	5.26 L	5.6%	−0.3%	+0.5%	−1.6%	−2.4%	−2.2%

* = Symptoms of PO₂tox reported. NA = Not applicable. Cells highlighted in grey indicate significant decrements in FVC from the individual’s mean baseline.

Table 3

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in F_IVC following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures.

Subject	Baseline FIVC		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Mean(L BTPS)	CV × 2 (%)
5	6.15	5.5%	−0.7%	+0.5% *	−2.4%	−0.8%	−0.2%
7	4.57	4.4%	+2.0%	+3.9% *	−1.8%	−0.4%	+2.6%
1	6.93	3.3%	−2.6%	−0.7% *	−0.3%	+0.7%	−0.3%
8	5.35	3.2%	+4.9%	+4.9% *	+5.8%	+6.5%	+1.9%
2	6.43	4.4%	−6.8% *	NA	−4.0%	−1.4%	−1.7%
4	6.61	6.0%	−3.4% *	NA	+0.5%	−2.1%	+5.6%
3	5.43	2.7%	−18.8% *	NA	−5.0%	−0.9%	−5.0%
9	6.15	5.9%	−15.1% *	NA	−12.5% *	−12.5%	−10.4%
Mean	5.95 L	4.5%	−5.1%	+2.2%	−2.5%	−1.4%	−0.9%

* Symptoms of PO₂tox reported. Cells highlighted in grey indicate significant decrements in F_IVC from baseline. NA = Not applicable.

Table 4

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in D_LCO following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures.

Subject	Baseline DLCO		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Mean(mL/mmHg/min)	CV × 2 (%)
5	37.9	8.7%	+3.2%	+2.6% *	+0.3%	+1.3%	−5.0%
7	26.1	7.0%	−2.2%	−5.6% *	−2.2%	−5.6%	−2.2%
1	41.1	9.5%	−3.1%	−7.3% *	−17.0%	−6.5%	−6.8%
8	33.1	11.2%	−3.1%	−4.3% *	−10.1%	−9.8%	−0.4%
2	40.6	13.9%	−10.1% *	NA	−7.7%	−15.1%	−21.7%
4	45.5	15.4%	−17.8% *	NA	−20.0%	−4.0%	−10.7%
3	39.6	6.9%	−16.6% *	NA	+3.6%	−8.5%	−3.2%
9	38.3	8.7%	−13.0% *	NA	−9.6% *	−27.6%	−20.8%
Mean	37.8	10.2%	−7.8%	−3.7%	−7.8%	−9.5%	−8.9%

* Symptoms of PO₂tox reported. Cells highlighted in grey indicate significant decrements in D_LCO from baseline. NA = Not applicable.

Appendix A. Diffusion Capacity for Carbon Monoxide Measurements Corrected for Hb and V_A and Additional Spirometry Measurements Taken Pre- and Post-Dive

Table A1

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in D_LCO adjusted for hemoglobin (D_LCO _adj) following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures.

Subject	Baseline DLCO adj		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Mean(mL/mmHg/min)	CV × 2 (%)
5	38.6	9.4%	+6.5%	+1.3% *	+1.3%	+1.3%	−2.6%
7	25.5	6.9%	−1.6%	−5.9% *	−2.0%	−2.0%	−1.2%
1	39.9	9.9%	−3.5%	−6.0% *	−18.8%	−5.8%	−3.3%
8	31.9	11.8%	−1.5%	−6.2% *	−8.4%	−6.2%	+1.3%
2	39.3	13.4%	−8.0% *	NA	−6.0%	−13.9%	−22.1%
4	45.0	15.2%	−16.9% *	NA	−20.9%	−6.7%	−10.9%
3	38.9	8.3%	−16.9% *	NA	+3.2%	−8.9%	−4.5%
9	38.5	9.0%	−13.0% *	NA	−11.4% *	−30.4%	−21.1%
Mean	37.2	10.5%	−6.9%	−4.2%	−7.9%	−9.1%	−8.1%

* Symptoms of pulmonary O₂ toxicity reported. Cells highlighted in grey indicate significant decrements in D_LCO_adj from baseline. NA = Not applicable.

Table A2

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in D_LCO adjusted for alveolar volume (D_LCO/V_A) following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures.

Subject	Baseline DLCO/VA		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Mean(mL/mmHg/min)	CV × 2 (%)
5	4.82	7.2%	+6.8%	+3.5% *	−1.5%	+3.7%	−1.0%
7	4.37	8.9%	−2.3%	−11.0% *	−5.2%	−9.6%	−3.7%
1	4.97	8.5%	−3.8%	−7.2% *	−14.5%	−7.4%	−10.3%
8	5.10	7.1%	−8.0%	−6.9% *	−12.5%	−17.6%	−4.3%
2	5.29	11.3%	−2.3% *	NA	−9.6%	−14.7%	−13.2%
4	5.85	10.3%	−9.6% *	NA	−16.8%	−9.9%	−12.5%
3	6.10	5.8%	−1.1% *	NA	−4.1%	−12.8%	−2.1%
9	5.05	9.5%	+3.6% *	NA	+15.8% *	−15.6%	−11.5%
Mean	5.19	8.6%	−2.1%	−5.4%	−6.1%	−10.5%	−7.3%

* Symptoms of pulmonary O₂ toxicity reported. Cells highlighted in grey indicate significant decrements in D_LCO/V_A from baseline. NA = Not applicable.

Table A3

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in alveolar volume (V_A) following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures.

Subject	Baseline VA		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Mean(L BTPS)	CV × 2 (%)
5	7.86	4.1%	−0.3%	−0.9% *	+1.05	−2.3%	−3.8%
7	5.97	4.2%	0.0%	+5.7% *	+3.4%	+4.0%	+1.7%
1	8.28	8.6%	+0.4%	−0.2% *	−3.2%	+0.1%	+4.0%
8	6.50	5.1%	+5.4%	+2.8% *	+2.8%	+9.7%	+4.2%
2	7.68	7.9%	−8.2% *	NA	+2.7%	−0.3%	+0.3%
4	7.77	8.4%	−9.1% *	NA	−3.7%	+6.7%	+2.2%
3	6.49	5.8%	−15.9% *	NA	+8.0%	+4.9%	−1.1%
9	7.59	5.2%	−16.3% *	NA	−22.1% *	−14.4%	−10.8%
Mean	7.27	6.2%	−5.5%	+1.9%	−1.4%	+1.1%	−0.4%

* Symptoms of pulmonary O₂ toxicity reported. Cells highlighted in grey indicate significant decrements in V_A from baseline. NA = Not applicable.

Table A4

Mean baseline levels, 2 × coefficient of variation (CV), and percent change in F_EV1 following the 202.65 kPa HBO exposures.

Subject	Baseline FEV1		Post-Dive 16 h O2	Post-Dive 28 h O2	Rec 1	Rec 2	Rec 3
	Mean(L BTPS)	CV × 2 (%)
5	3.97	5.3%	−0.8%	+6.3% *	−0.5%	+1.3%	−3.3%
7	3.08	6.1%	+0.6%	−2.3% *	−1.3%	−5.5%	−5.8%
1	3.96	3.9%	+2.8%	−2.5% *	−1.3%	+0.3%	−2.3%
8	3.81	6.4%	+2.1%	+5.5% *	+3.1%	−3.1%	−4.2%
2	4.28	7.2%	+3.3% *	NA	+0.9%	−1.6%	−1.9%
4	4.16	7.5%	−2.4% *	NA	−5.5%	−3.4%	−5.5%
3	3.30	7.9%	−8.5% *	NA	−4.5%	+0.3%	+0.3%
9	3.96	6.7%	−6.1% *	NA	−20.2% *	−9.1%	−6.3%
Mean	3.82	6.4%	−1.1%	+1.8%	−3.7%	−2.6%	−3.6%

* Symptoms of pulmonary O₂ toxicity reported. Cells highlighted in grey indicate significant decrements in F_EV1 from baseline. NA = Not applicable.

References

1. Clark, J.M.; Thom, S.R. Oxygen under pressure. Bennett and Elliott’s Physiology and Medicine of Diving; 5th ed. Brubakk, A.O.; Neuman, T.S. Saunders Publishing: Philadelphia, PA, USA, Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003; ISBN 978-0702025716

2. Clark, J.M. Pulmonary Oxygen Tolerance in Man and Derivation of Pulmonary Oxygen Tolerance Curves. Ph.D. Thesis; Institute for Environmental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1970.

3. Clark, J.M.; Lambertsen, C.J. Rate of development of pulmonary O₂ toxicity in man during O₂ breathing at 2.0 Ata. J. Appl. Physiol.; 1971; 30, pp. 739-752. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1971.30.5.739] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4929472]

4. Clark, J.M.; Lambertsen, C.J.; Gelfand, R.; Flores, N.D.; Pisarello, J.B.; Rossman, M.D.; Elias, J.A. Effects of prolonged oxygen exposure at 1.5, 2.0, or 2.5 ATA on pulmonary function in men (Predictive Studies V). J. Appl. Physiol.; 1999; 86, pp. 243-259. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1999.86.1.243]

5. Shykoff, B.E. Pulmonary effects of submerged oxygen breathing: 4-, 6-, and 8-h dives at 140 kPa. Undersea Hyperb. Med.; 2005; 32, pp. 351-361.

6. Lang, J.D.; McArdle, P.J.; O'Reilly, P.J.; Matalon, S. Oxidant-Antioxidant Balance in Acute Lung Injury. Chest; 2002; 122, pp. 314S-320S. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.122.6_suppl.314S]

7. Högman, M.; Lehtimäki, L. Chapter 4—Exhaled nitric oxide physiology and modeling. Breathborne Biomarkers and the Human Volatilome; 2nd ed. Beauchamp, J.; Davis, C.; Pleil, J. Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 63-77. ISBN 9780128199671

8. Kharitonov, S.A.; Barnes, P.J. Exhaled Markers of Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2001; 163, pp. 1693-1722. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.2009041]

9. Singh, S.; Evans, T.W. Nitric oxide, the biological mediator of the decade: Fact or fiction?. Eur. Respir. J.; 1997; 10, pp. 699-707. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.97.10030699] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9073009]

10. Garat, C.; Jayr, C.; Eddahibi, S.; Laffon, M.; Meignan, M.; Adnot, S. Effects of inhaled nitric oxide or inhibition of endogenous nitric oxide formation on hyperoxic lung injury. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 1997; 155, pp. 1957-1964. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.6.9196102] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9196102]

11. Atochin, D.N.; Gutsaeva, D.R.; Godfrey, R.R.; Huang, P.L.; Piantadosi, C.A.; Allen, B.W.; Bao, X.-C.; Mao, A.-R.; Fang, Y.-Q.; Fan, Y.-H. et al. Contributions of nitric oxide synthase isoforms to pulmonary oxygen toxicity, local vs. mediated effects. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Mol. Physiol.; 2008; 294, pp. L984-L990. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00420.2007]

12. Allen, B.W.; Demchenko, I.T.; Piantadosi, C.A. Two faces of nitric oxide: Implications for cellular mechanisms of oxygen toxicity. J. Appl. Physiol.; 2009; 106, pp. 662-667. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.91109.2008]

13. Dias-Freitas, F.; Metelo-Coimbra, C.; Roncon-Albuquerque, R. Molecular mechanisms underlying hyperoxia acute lung injury. Respir. Med.; 2016; 119, pp. 23-28. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2016.08.010]

14. Harabin, A.L.; Homer, L.D.; Weathersby, P.K.; Flynn, E.T. An analysis of decrements in vital capacity as an index of pulmonary oxygen toxicity. J. Appl. Physiol.; 1987; 63, pp. 1130-1135. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1987.63.3.1130] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3654459]

15. Miller, M.R.; Crapo, R.; Hankinson, J.; Brusasco, V.; Burgos, F.; Casaburi, R.; Coates, A.; Enright, P.; van der Grinten, C.P.M.; Gustafsson, P. et al. General considerations for lung function testing. Eur. Respir. J.; 2005; 26, pp. 153-161. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00034505] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15994402]

16. Miller, M.R.; Hankinson, J.; Brusasco, V.; Burgos, F.; Casaburi, R.; Coates, A.; Crapo, R.; Enright, P.; Van Der Grinten, C.P.M.; Gustafsson, P. et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur. Respir. J.; 2005; 26, pp. 319-338. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00034805]

17. Wanger, J.; Clausen, J.L.; Coates, A.; Pedersen, O.F.; Brusasco, V.; Burgos, F.; Casaburi, R.; Crapo, R.; Enright, P.; van der Grinten, C.P.M. et al. Standardisation of the measurement of lung volumes. Eur. Respir. J.; 2005; 26, pp. 511-522. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00035005]

18. MacIntyre, N.; Crapo, R.O.; Viegi, G.; Johnson, D.C.; van der Grinten, C.P.M.; Brusasco, V.; Burgos, F.; Casaburi, R.; Coates, A.; Enright, P. et al. Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur. Respir. J.; 2005; 26, pp. 720-735. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1183/09031936.05.00034905]

19. Condorelli, P.; Shin, H.-W.; Aledia, A.S.; Silkoff, P.E.; George, S.C. A simple technique to characterize proximal and peripheral nitric oxide exchange using constant flow exhalations and an axial diffusion model. J. Appl. Physiol.; 2007; 102, pp. 417-425. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00533.2006]

20. ATS/ERS—American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Recommendations for Standardized Procedures for the Online and Offline Measurement of Exhaled Lower Respiratory Nitric Oxide and Nasal Nitric Oxide, 2005. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 2005; 171, pp. 912-930. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200406-710ST]

21. Van Ooij, P.-J.A.M. Pulmonary Oxygen Toxicity in Professional Diving: Scire Est Mensurare?. Ph.D. Thesis; University of Am-sterdam: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2013.

22. van Ooij, P.; Hollmann, M.; van Hulst, R.; Sterk, P. Assessment of pulmonary oxygen toxicity: Relevance to professional diving; a review. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol.; 2013; 189, pp. 117-128. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2013.07.014]

23. Wingelaar, T.T.; Brinkman, P.; Van Ooij, P.J.A.M.; Hoencamp, R.; Der Zee, A.H.M.-V.; Hollmann, M.W.; Van Hulst, R.A. Markers of Pulmonary Oxygen Toxicity in Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Using Exhaled Breath Analysis. Front. Physiol.; 2019; 10, 475. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00475] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31068838]

24. Cronin, W.A.; Forbes, A.S.; Wagner, K.; Kaplan, P.; Cataneo, R.; Phillips, M.; Mahon, R.; Hall, A. Exhaled Volatile Organic Compounds Precedes Pulmonary Injury in a Swine Pulmonary Oxygen Toxicity Model. Front. Physiol.; 2019; 10, 1297. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.01297] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31849689]

25. de Jong, F.J.M.; Wingelaar, T.T.; Brinkman, P.; van Ooij, P.-J.A.M.; der Zee, A.-H.M.-V.; Hollmann, M.W.; van Hulst, R.A. Pulmonary Oxygen Toxicity Through Exhaled Breath Markers After Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment Table 6. Front. Physiol.; 2022; 13, 899568. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.899568] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35620607]

26. de Jong, F.J.M.; Wingelaar, T.T.; Brinkman, P.; van Ooij, P.-J.A.M.; der Zee, A.H.M.-V.; Hollmann, M.W.; van Hulst, R.A. Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath Following a COMEX-30 Treatment Table. Metabolites; 2023; 13, 316. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo13030316]

27. Fothergill, D.M.; Borras, E.; McCartney, M.M.; Schelegle, E.S.; Davis, C.E. Exhaled breath condensate profiles of U.S. Navy divers following prolonged hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and nitrogen-oxygen (Nitrox) chamber exposures. J. Breath Res.; 2023; 17, 037105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1752-7163/acd715] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207635]

28. Gustafsson, L.; Leone, A.; Persson, M.; Wiklund, N.; Moncada, S. Endogenous nitric oxide is present in the exhaled air of rabbits, guinea pigs and humans. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.; 1991; 181, pp. 852-857. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-291X(91)91268-H] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1721811]

29. Schmetterer, L.; Strenn, K.; Kastner, J.; Eichler, H.G.; Wolzt, M. Exhaled NO during graded changes in inhaled oxygen in man. Thorax; 1997; 52, pp. 736-738. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thx.52.8.736]

30. Fothergill, D.M.; Gasier, H.; Keller, M. Effect of hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) duration on expired nitric oxide (NOexp) and carbon monoxide (COexp). Program for the 17th International Congress of Hyperbaric Medicine Triennial Meeting, Cape Town, South Africa, 16–19 March 2011; Cronje, F. DesignWrite: Valhalla, South Africa, 2011; 20.

31. Fothergill, D.M.; Gasier, H.; Keller, M. Exhaled nitric oxide (NOexp) and carbon monoxide (COexp) as noninvasive markers of hyperbaric oxidative stress in humans. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Annual Scientific Meeting, Fort Worth, TX, USA, 15–18 June 2011. Undersea Hyperb. Med.; 2011; 38, 430.

32. Fothergill, D.M.; and Gasier, H.G. Time course of changes in expired nitric oxide and carbon monoxide during acute normobaric hyperoxic exposures. Abstracts and Proceeding from European Underwater Baromedical Society Annual Scientific Meeting, Belgrade, Serbia, 12–15 September 2012; Specijalna Bolnica za Hiperbaricnu Medicine: Belgrade, Serbia, 2012; 52. ISBN 978-86-915961-0-1

33. Fothergill, D.M.; Weathersby, P.K. Relationship between exhaled nitric oxide and hyperoxic stress. FASEB J.; 2015; 29, 678.1.Available online: https://faseb.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1096/fasebj.29.1_supplement.678.1 (accessed on 7 August 2023).

34. Puthucheary, Z.A.; Liu, J.; Bennett, M.; Trytko, B.; Chow, S.; Thomas, P.S. Exhaled Nitric Oxide is Decreased by Exposure to the Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Environment. Mediat. Inflamm.; 2006; 2006, 72620. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/MI/2006/72620]

35. Taraldsøy, T.; Bolann, B.J.; Thorsen, E. Reduced nitric oxide concentration in exhaled gas after exposure to hyperbaric hyperoxia. Undersea Hyperb. Med.; 2007; 34, pp. 321-327.

36. Kjelkenes, I.; Thorsen, E. Time course of the reduction in nitric oxide concentration in exhaled gas after exposure to hyperbaric hyperoxia. Diving Hyperb. Med. J.; 2009; 39, pp. 77-80.

37. van Ooij, P.J.; Houtkooper, A.; van Hulst, R. Variations in exhaled nitric oxide concentration after three types of dives. Diving Hyperb. Med.; 2010; 40, pp. 4-7.

38. Caspersen, C.; Stensrud, T.; Thorsen, E. Bronchial nitric oxide flux and alveolar nitric oxide concentration after exposure to hyperoxia. Aviat. Space Environ. Med.; 2011; 82, pp. 946-950. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.2995.2011] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21961398]

39. Uusijärvi, J.; Eriksson, K.; Larsson, A.C.; Nihlén, C.; Schiffer, T.; Lindholm, P.; Weitzberg, E. Effects of hyperbaric oxygen on nitric oxide generation in humans. Nitric Oxide; 2015; 44, pp. 88-97. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.niox.2014.12.002]

40. Castagna, O.; Bergmann, C.; Blatteau, J.E. Is a 12-h Nitrox dive hazardous for pulmonary function?. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.; 2019; 119, pp. 2723-2731. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-019-04248-w]

41. Fothergill, D.M.; Ross, W. Impulse oscillometery and spirometry indices of pulmonary function in a diver with severe symptoms of pulmonary oxygen toxicity. Abstract & Conference Book TRICON2018 (Second Tricontinental Conference on Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine); 44th Annual Meeting of the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS), 47nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the South Pacific Underwater Medical Society (SPUMS), Conference of the South African Underwater and Hyperbaric Medical Association, Durban, South Africa, 23–29 September 2018; Bennett, M.; Germonpre, P. Londocor Event Management (PTY) Ltd.: Roodepoort, South Africa, 2018; 68.

42. Canning, B.J.; Woo, A.; Mazzone, S.B. Neuronal Modulation of Airway and Vascular Tone and Their Influence on Nonspecific Airways Responsiveness in Asthma. J. Allergy; 2012; 2012, 108149. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/108149]

43. Turanlahti, M.; Pesonen, E.; Lassus, P.; Andersson, S. Nitric oxide and hyperoxia in oxidative lung injury. Acta Paediatr.; 2000; 89, pp. 966-970. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2000.tb00418.x]

44. Sun, X.-J.; Liu, W.-W.; Han, C.-H.; Zhang, P.-X.; Zheng, J.; Liu, K. Nitric oxide and hyperoxic acute lung injury. Med. Gas Res.; 2016; 6, pp. 85-95. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.184718] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27867474]

45. Fismen, L.; Eide, T.; Hjelde, A.; Svardal, A.M.; Djurhuus, R. Hyperoxia but not ambient pressure decreases tetrahydrobiopterin level without affecting the enzymatic capability of nitric oxide synthase in human endothelial cells. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol.; 2013; 113, pp. 1695-1704. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-013-2595-x] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23385656]

46. Hesthammer, R.; Eide, T.; Thorsen, E.; Svardal, A.M.; Djurhuus, R. Decrease of tetrahydrobiopterin and NO generation in endothelial cells exposed to simulated diving. Undersea Hyperb. Med.; 2019; 46, pp. 159-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22462/04.06.2019.9]

47. Hesthammer, R.; Dahle, S.; Storesund, J.P.; Eide, T.; Djurhuus, R.; Svardal, A.M.; Thorsen, E. Nitric oxide in exhaled gas and tetrahydrobiopterin in plasma after exposure to hyperoxia. Undersea Hyperb. Med.; 2020; 47, pp. 197-202. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.22462/04.06.2020.4]

48. McNeill, E.; Channon, K.M. The role of tetrahydrobiopterin in inflammation and cardiovascular disease. Thromb. Haemost.; 2012; 108, pp. 832-839. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1160/TH12-06-0424] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23052970]