ABSTRACT
This study aims to analyse which are better step duration related to the maximum lactate steady-state test (MLSS) intensity and the intensity equivalent to the accumulation of 4mmol/L lactate (AnT4) determined through an incremental protocol using a rowing ergometer, using different steps durations (step3min, step5min, step7min). Ten elite Portuguese rowers (25.1 ± 4.82 years; 177.5 ± 5.50 cm; 69.8 ± 2.74 kg) performed rowing ergometer protocols to determine the maximum lactate steady state (MLSS). Subsequently, incremental tests were realised to determine AnT4, using different step durations (step3min, step5min, step7min). The results showed a strong correlation between MLSS and AnT4 (r>0.90; ^<0.001) obtained AnT different steps (step3min, step5min, step7min). However, the determined intensity equivalent to 4mmol/L obtained with different step durations that showed the highest correlation with MLSS (246.5 ± 35.20W) was verified in the protocol of 7minute steps (251.5 ± 35,72W). The present study indicates that the use of 7 minutes steps is the most appropriate for determining the AnT4 intensity related to the aerobic component of a high-performance rowing athlete.
Keywords: Anaerobic threshold, MLSS, steptest, Concept2 rowing.
INTRODUCTION
During the last decades, several publications have used lactate as a marker of training adaptations and a predictor of performance (Hahn et al., 2000). However, the high variability associated with protocol procedures in different studies makes comparative analysis difficult since they differ in concepts, methodologies, and the interpretation of results (Faude et al., 2009).
In the control and evaluation of international rowers, it is common to use the discontinuous incremental protocol to determine the intensity equivalent to the anaerobic threshold, a physiological criterion commonly used in training control (Beneke et al., 2001). The results obtained through the incremental protocol have been considered essential for the training load prescription and competition preparation (Nolte, 2005).
A method considered valid for determining the anaerobic threshold (AnT) is the lactate maximal steady-state test (MLSS) (Urhausen et al., 1993; Beneke, 2003; Billat et al., 2003). The MLSS aims to identify the intensity at which the lactate concentration does not increase by more than 1mmol/L during the final 20 minutes of a continuous 30-minute test with constant load. However, despite being the most suitable for assessing an athlete's cardiorespiratory capacity in the aerobic domain, the test has the disadvantage of being very long. This characteristic imposes a high strain on the athlete, often causing changes in the training plan for several days. This limitation often leads to opting for incremental tests (continuous and discontinuous) to determine the intensity equivalent to AnT, either through different modulations of the lactate accumulation curve or from fixed lactate concentrations (Beneke, 2003). This option has the advantages of ease and economy in the implementation and can be carried out during any training period. The validity of some of the protocols has been contested by several authors (Heck et al., 1985; Foxdal et al., 1996; Faude et al., 2009), mentioning, among other reasons, that the duration of the step duration may influence the value found for the anaerobic threshold. The use of the 3 minutes steps in an incremental protocol has become common in the evaluations of rowing athletes (Beneke, 1995), but it is also applied in other sports, such as runners and cyclists (Faude et al., 2009)). In some cases, the intensity performing at 4mmol/L during protocol could be underestimated compared to MLSS (Baldari et al., 2000).
In this sense, the relevance of defining a proper incremental protocol that indicates the anaerobic threshold intensity with higher precision arises. Thus, this study proposes to evaluate which step duration in an incremental protocol (3 minutes, 5 minutes or 7 minutes) allows for identifying the intensity equivalent to the 4mmol/L of lactate accumulation (AnT4), which is the most strongly with the intensity of the maximal lactate steady preparation state (MLSS).
METHOD
Subjects
Ten elite Portuguese rowers volunteered for this study, aged between 19 and 32 years (25.1 ± 4.82 years), with a height of 177.5 ± 5.50cm and 69.8 ± 2.74kg of body mass. All athletes belong to the senior lightweight category, having extensive experience in the sport (10 ± 4.99 years of practice), representing the national team in World Championships (n=8) and Olympic Games (n=2). All participants were informed in advance of the study's objectives and gave their voluntary written consent. The scientific board approved the study of the Faculty of Sport of the University of Porto (FADEUP) following the Helsinki Declaration and the Oviedo Convention.
Instruments
To determine the rowers' body mass and height, a Tanita scale model InnerScan BCM (Tanita, Japan) was used with a precision of 0.1kg and a graduated stadiometer with an accuracy of 1mm. Skinfolds were measured using a calliper (Lange) with a 10g/mm2 pressure. All evaluation rowing protocols were performed on the Concept2 Model PM3 ergometer (Concept2, England) adjusted to a drag factor of 130 (Nolte, 2005), a value that simulates the vessel's resistance in the water considering the rower's body mass. Heart rate recording was performed at 5 seconds intervals using an RS800cx heart rate monitor (Polar Electro, Finland).
Lactatemia was obtained using the LactatePro blood lactate analyser (Arkray, Japan) with the respective lactate reactive strips. Capillary blood micro samples were collected in the earlobe (Dassonville et al., 1998) at a maximum interval of 45 seconds (Kass et al., 2009) immediately after each period of effort.
Procedures
All the athletes' coaches were informed of the procedures and the importance of avoiding higher training loads 48 hours before the applied protocols, respecting the conditions for obtaining the best performance in the 2000m test, avoiding stressful efforts and favouring the maintenance of the usual routines in food and hydration. The interval between trials was at least 48h. During this period, athletes were asked to perform low-intensity recovery training sessions.
On the first day of testing, an anthropometric assessment was carried out. After 15 minutes of warm-up at low intensity, the athletes performed an "all-out" protocol of 2000m on a rowing ergometer. The intensity (power) and the maximal heart rate during the protocol were assessed.
The maximum power at stable lactate (MLSS) intensity was determined in the following sessions. The MLSS was determined according to the methodology adopted by Beneke (1995). The protocol defines the maximum constant intensity (power) where the lactate concentration does not increase by more than 1mmol/L during the final 20 minutes of the 30 minutes of the continuous constant load test. Capillary blood samples were taken at the 10th, 15th, 20th, 25th and 30th minutes, and heart rate was recorded. The initial constant load was 60% of the power obtained in the maximum performance "all-out" 2000m, applying increments > 2.5% during several moments (3 to 5 days) until the steady state was reached.
Finally, in the following sessions and respecting 48 hours of recovery, incremental protocols were performed to determine the power at the concentration of 4mmol/L of lactate. Three incremental protocols were performed with different step durations, namely 3 minutes, 5 minutes and another step with 7 minutes, to determine the AnT intensity. All protocols were performed in random mode. The initial load was 60% of the power obtained in the maximum performance "all-out" 2000m, applying increments of 5% until the athletes reached above 6mmol/L of blood lactate. Through linear interpolation, the external mechanical power of the rowing and the heart rate corresponding to the anaerobic threshold was determined using a fixed concentration of 4mmol/L of blood lactate.
Statistical analysis
Exploratory data analysis will be focused on descriptive statistics values, mean (M), standard deviation (SD), minimum (Min) and maximum (Max) values. In addition to the information produced by the standard deviation, the dispersion was appreciated by the coefficient of variation [(CV=SD/M)·100]. Friedman's ANOVA compared the three effort levels (W) simultaneously. The post hoc Bonferroni test was applied if statistically significant differences were found. The correlation was calculated using the Spearman-rho correlation coefficient with the magnitude of the correlation interpreted according to Pestana & Gageiro (2005). Data analysis was processed in the statistical software SPSS 19.0, and the adopted significance level was 5% (p<0.05).
RESULTS
Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics values of the intensity at maximum lactate steady state (MLSS) and 4mmol/L (AnT4) intensity when performing at the different incremental protocols. (step3min, step5min and step7min). By analysing the results, we can realise that the equivalent intensity with the concentration of 4mmol/L was obtained through the protocol with 7 minutes steps (251.5 ± 35.72W) being the closest to the maximum lactate steady state of (246.5 ± 35.20W).
The correlation between MLSS and AnT4 calculated from the different duration step values is present in Figure 1, showing the high correlation values (r > 0.90; p<0.001).
Table 2 shows that the simultaneous comparison, by Friedman's ANOVA, between the three levels of AnT4 effort resulted in significant differences (x2=17.897;p<0.001).
The posthoc analysis with Bonferroni adjustment showed significant differences between AnT4 step3min (W) versus AnT4 step5min (W) and AnT4 step3min (W) versus AnT4 step7min (W), with values of ^=0.005. In both cases, due to the higher mean rank of ANT4 step3min (W). It should be noted that there are no significant differences between AnT4 step5min (W) and AnT4 step7min (W), revealing the sample's homogeneity at these levels of effort.
The mean value of lactate production corresponding to MLSS was 3.7mmol/L with a standard deviation of 0.82mmol/L.
Table 3 shows the heart rate values equivalent to MLSS and intensity of 4mmol/L performed at the three different protocols.
DISCUSSION
A strong and very significant correlation between all step duration and the MLSS was found. Our results showed that the intensity equivalent to 4mmol/L obtained through the protocol with 7 minutes steps (251.5 ± 35.72W) is the closest to that determined through MLSS protocol (246.5 ± 35,20W), showing a difference of 5W that contrasts with the difference of 31W obtained in the 3 minutes steps protocol.
Determining the step duration in the incremental protocol that produces the closest intensity to the MLSS is extremely important to increase the precision in training prescription, namely in lightweight rowers. This importance is reinforced by several authors who refer to the maximal power, the anaerobic threshold and the lean mass as the physiological characteristics that distinguish competitors' success and failure (Gayer, 1994; Shephard et al., 1998).
According to several authors (Urhausen et al.,1993; Beneke et al.,2003), the more appropriate method for determining the AnT is the MLSS. However, despite being the most suitable for assessing an athlete's endurance capacity (Billat et al., 1996), the MLSS protocol requires a long application, which could cause perturbance in the athlete's preparation. The use of an incremental protocol to determine the AnT based on fixed lactate concentrations is common. These faster and more economical protocols can be performed in any training period without significantly changing the training periodisation.
In addition, a high correlation between AnT4 and MLSS was found in several studies, except for the one realised by Schuylenbergh et al. (2004). The intensity of 4mmol/L in incremental tests appears to be higher than in the MLSS test (Faude et al., 2009).
However, it is essential to point out that different methodologies were applied in these studies, particularly the value of load from step to step. Limited by those different methodologies used, it remains for us to analyse them individually. Heck et al. (1985;1991) found a strong correlation (r = 0.98) between AnT4 and MLSS during running and cycling.
Additionally, they observed that the speed and power corresponding to AnT4 were superior to MLSS. However, it is essential to note that this difference in power only occurred when using incremental protocols with 3 minutes steps. However, when using 5 minutes steps, the differences were no longer observed (Heck et al., 1985). Analysing the comparative study of several scientific articles compiled by Faude et al. (2009), it is crucial to analyse the results obtained by Beneke (1995) due to the specificity of the sample since they are rowers. This author used 3 minutes steps to determine the AnT4, getting an average power of 32W higher than in the MLSS test. Similar to Beneke (1995), our results also show a difference of 31W between AnT4 and MLSS when using 3 minutes steps, showing an overestimated power AnT 4mmolL.
In general, in compared studies, regardless of the duration of the steps, the AnT4 intensities overestimated the MLSS (Baldari et al., 2000). This result may be due to using a fixed concentration of 4mmol/L since studies compare different methods for determining AnT. The tests performed on cyclists (Cheng et al., 1992) and runners (Nicholson et al., 2001) should be highlighted, reporting that the intensities obtained using the fixed concentration method of 4mmol/L were higher compared to the remaining methods applied. Thus, overestimating the AnT. Given this situation, Figueira et al. (2004) suggested using a fixed concentration of 3.5mmol/L of blood lactate as equivalent to AnT, justifying this choice due to the use of incremental protocols with steps of only 3 minutes to estimate the intensity of AnT correctly.
In summary, we can conclude that the literature is divergent both in conceptual aspects and in the methods for determining the AnT.
To define the incremental protocol with the most reasonable step, we compared the AnT4 intensity obtained through the three durations of steps and the MLSS. Analysing the results, referring to Bonferroni's posthoc, statistically, significant differences occur between AnT4 step3min (W) versus AnT4 step5min (W) (p=0.005) and AnT4 step3min (W) versus AnT4 step7min (W), in both cases due to the higher mean rank of AnT4 step3min (W). It should be noted that there are no significant differences between AnT4 step5min (W) between AnT4 step7min (W), which shows the sample's homogeneity AnT these steps.
Focused on results, the protocol that uses 3 minutes steps does not represent the same lactic concentration obtained in the MLSS test, showing the difference of 31W obtained between the ANT4 and MLSS intensity. This conclusion contradicts many physiology laboratories that use protocols with durations between 3 and 5 minutes to test the AnT. These levels will even be considered adequate for measurements of ventilatory capacity and heart rate evolution. Still, according to Hahn et al. (2000), the duration will not be acceptable when the objective is to determine the intensity of the exercise corresponding to the AnT. Tests for determining lactate generally require longer steps than the ventilatory threshold tests, which could be partly explained by the differences between lactate in muscle and blood. Blood lactate is always lower than muscle lactate.
For this reason, when we use duration steps lower than 4 minutes, lactic muscle acidosis may be underestimated (Green et al., 1983; Jacobs, 1986). Foster et al. (1995) add that blood lactate may indicate intramuscular lactic acidosis. Still, a particular time is necessary for blood lactate to correspond to the maximum intramuscular lactate concentration because the diffusion of muscle-blood lactate is not immediate.
Our results do not show significant differences between the 5- and 7 minutes steps. However, if we compare the means, we can verify that the AnT4 obtained through the protocol with 7 minutes steps (251.5 ± 35,72W) is closest to the MLSS (246.5 ± 35.20W).
Several factors indicate the use of 7 minutes steps as being the most valid. Although the difference between the MLSS and the AnT with steps of 7 minutes is 5W and that of 5 minutes is only 9W, AnT the level of high competition, all details count, and this is a detail with great importance since minor physiological differences can correspond to major changes in training planning and control.
In the future, it would be relevant to test rowers on the field, evaluate the athlete on the boat, on the water or even as a team, and verify the impact of these conditions on the evaluation and determination of the aerobic competence of a rowing athlete.
CONCLUSIONS
In search of a more straightforward and less time-consuming test, we tried to determine which incremental protocol for anaerobic threshold (AnT) evaluation was best correlated with the maximum lactate steady state (MLSS). Our results allowed us to verify that the steps (step3min, step5min, and step7min) chosen to test the anaerobic threshold present a high correlation with the MLSS. However, due to the superior correlation with the MLSS, the proposal that emerges from this study defends the 7 minutes steps (step7min) as the most suitable for determining, through the AnT, the aerobic competence of a rowing athlete.
Conflict of interest: nothing to declare. Funding: nothing to declare.
Received: 18/07/2022. Accepted: 09/03/2023.
REFERENCES
Beneke, R. (1995). Anaerobic threshold, individual anaerobic threshold, and maximal lactate steady-state in rowing. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 27(6), 863-867. DOI: 10.1249/00005768-199506000-00010
Beneke, R., Leithâuser, R., & Hütler, M. (2001). Dependence of the maximal lactate steady state on the motor pattern of exercise. British JSports Med, 35, 192-196. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.35.3.192
Beneke, R. (2003) Maximal lactate steady state concentration (MLSS): experimental and modeling approaches. Eur JAppl Physiol, 88, 361-369. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-002-0713-2
Baldari, C., & Guidetti, L. (2000). A simple method for individual anaerobic threshold as predictor of max lactate steady state. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 32(10), 1798-1802. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200010000-00022
Billat, V. (1996). Use of blood lactate measurements for prediction of exercise performance and for control of training: recommendations for long-distance running. Sports Med, 22(3), 157-175. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-199622030-00003
Billat, V. Sirvent, P., Py, G., Koralsztein, J., & Mercier, J. (2003) The concept of maximal lactate steady state - A bridge between biochemistry, physiology and sport science. Sports Med, 33(6), 407-426. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200333060-00003
Cheng, B., Kuipers, H., Snyder, A., Keizer, H., Jeukendrup, A., & Hesselink, M. (1992). A new approach for the determination of ventilatory and lactate thresholds. Int J Sports Med, 13(7), 518-522. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021309
Dassonville, J., Beillot, J., Lessard, Y., Jan, J., Andre, M., & Le Pourcelet C. (1998). Blood lactate concentrations during exercise: effect of sampling site and exercise mode. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 38, 39-46. PMID: 9638031
Faude, O., Kindermann, W., & Meyer, T. (2009). Lactate threshold concepts: how valid are they? Sports Med, 39(6), 469-490. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-200939060-00003
Figueira, R., & Denadai, B., (2004) Relaçöes entre o limiar anaerobio, limiar anaerobio individual e a máxima fase estável de lactato em ciclistas. Rev bras cienc mov, 12(2), 91-95. ID: lil-524467
Foster, C., Schrager M., & Snyder, A. (1995) Blood lactate and respiratory measurement of the capacity for sustained exercise. Physiological assessment of human fitness. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 5, 57-72.
Foxdal, P., Sjodin, A., & Sjodin, B. (1996). Comparison of blood lactate concentrations obtained during incremental and constant intensity exercise. Int J Sports Med, 17, 360-365. DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-972861
Gayer, G. (1994) Physiological discriminators of rowing performance in male, club rowers (Doctoral dissertation, Washington State University)
Green, H., Hughson, R., Orr, W., & Ranney, D. (1983). Anaerobic threshold, blood lactate and muscle metabolites in progressive exercise. J Appl Physiol, (54)4, 1032-1038. DOI: 10.1152/jappl. 1983.54.4.1032
Hahn, A., Bourdon, P., & Tanner, R. (2000) Protocols for the physiological assessment of rowers. Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 311-326
Heck, H., Mader, A., Hess, G., Mucke, S., Muller, R., & Hollmann W. (1985). Justification of the 4mmol/l Lactate Threshold. Int J Sports Med, 6(03), 117-130. DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1025824
Jacobs, I. (1986). Blood lactate. Implications for training and sports performance. Sports Med, 3(1), 10-25. DOI: 10.2165/00007256-198603010-00003
Kass, L., & Carpenter R. (2009). The effect of sampling time on blood lactate concentration ([Bla]) in trained rowers. Int J Sports Physiol Perform, 4(2), 218-228. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.4.2.218
Nicholson, R., & Sleivert, G. (2001). Indices of lactate threshold and their relationship with 10-km running velocity. Med Sci Sports Exer, 33(2), 339-342. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200102000-00026
Nolte, V. (2005). Rowing Faster. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics
Schuylenbergh, R., Eynde, B., & Hespel, P. (2004) Correlations between lactate and ventilatory thresholds and the maximal lactate steady state in elite cyclists. Int J Sports Med, 25(6), 403-408. DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-819942
Shephard, R. (1998) Science and medicine of rowing: A review. J Sports Sci, 16(7), 603-620. DOI: 10.1080/026404198366416
Urhausen, A., Weiler, B., & Kindermann, W. (1993) Heart rate, blood lactate and catecholamine during ergometer and water rowing. Int J Sports Med, 14(1), 20-23. DI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021218
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
This study aims to analyse which are better step duration related to the maximum lactate steady-state test (MLSS) intensity and the intensity equivalent to the accumulation of 4mmol/L lactate (AnT4) determined through an incremental protocol using a rowing ergometer, using different steps durations (step3min, step5min, step7min). Ten elite Portuguese rowers (25.1 ± 4.82 years; 177.5 ± 5.50 cm; 69.8 ± 2.74 kg) performed rowing ergometer protocols to determine the maximum lactate steady state (MLSS). Subsequently, incremental tests were realised to determine AnT4, using different step durations (step3min, step5min, step7min). The results showed a strong correlation between MLSS and AnT4 (r>0.90; ^<0.001) obtained AnT different steps (step3min, step5min, step7min). However, the determined intensity equivalent to 4mmol/L obtained with different step durations that showed the highest correlation with MLSS (246.5 ± 35.20W) was verified in the protocol of 7minute steps (251.5 ± 35,72W). The present study indicates that the use of 7 minutes steps is the most appropriate for determining the AnT4 intensity related to the aerobic component of a high-performance rowing athlete.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Faculdade de Ciencias do Desporto da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
2 Faculdade de Ciencias do Desporto e Educaçâo Física da Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal





