It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Preoperative radiological identification of mandibular canals is essential for maxillofacial surgery. This study demonstrates the reproducibility of a deep learning system (DLS) by evaluating its localisation performance on 165 heterogeneous cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans from 72 patients in comparison to an experienced radiologist’s annotations. We evaluated the performance of the DLS using the symmetric mean curve distance (SMCD), the average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), and the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The reproducibility of the SMCD was assessed using the within-subject coefficient of repeatability (RC). Three other experts rated the diagnostic validity twice using a 0–4 Likert scale. The reproducibility of the Likert scoring was assessed using the repeatability measure (RM). The RC of SMCD was 0.969 mm, the median (interquartile range) SMCD and ASSD were 0.643 (0.186) mm and 0.351 (0.135) mm, respectively, and the mean (standard deviation) DSC was 0.548 (0.138). The DLS performance was most affected by postoperative changes. The RM of the Likert scoring was 0.923 for the radiologist and 0.877 for the DLS. The mean (standard deviation) Likert score was 3.94 (0.27) for the radiologist and 3.84 (0.65) for the DLS. The DLS demonstrated proficient qualitative and quantitative reproducibility, temporal generalisability, and clinical validity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Department of Radiology Tampere University Hospital, Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere, Finland (GRID:grid.412330.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0628 2985); Chiang Mai University, The Graduate School, Chiang Mai, Thailand (GRID:grid.7132.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9039 7662)
2 Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland (GRID:grid.5373.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0838 9418)
3 Aalto University School of Science, Espoo, Finland (GRID:grid.5373.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0838 9418); British Library, Alan Turing Institute, London, UK (GRID:grid.36212.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 2308 1542)
4 Department of Radiology Tampere University Hospital, Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere, Finland (GRID:grid.412330.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 0628 2985)
5 Planmeca Oy, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.509858.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 0390 9674)
6 Chiang Mai University, Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai, Thailand (GRID:grid.7132.7) (ISNI:0000 0000 9039 7662)