It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Perception is often modelled as a process of active inference, whereby prior expectations are combined with noisy sensory measurements to estimate the structure of the world. This mathematical framework has proven critical to understanding perception, cognition, motor control, and social interaction. While theoretical work has shown how priors can be computed from environmental statistics, their neural instantiation could be realised through multiple competing encoding schemes. Using a data-driven approach, here we extract the brain’s representation of visual orientation and compare this with simulations from different sensory coding schemes. We found that the tuning of the human visual system is highly conditional on stimulus-specific variations in a way that is not predicted by previous proposals. We further show that the adopted encoding scheme effectively embeds an environmental prior for natural image statistics within the sensory measurement, providing the functional architecture necessary for optimal inference in the earliest stages of cortical processing.
Perception is often modelled using a Bayesian framework, but its neural instantiation remains unclear. Using a novel modelling approach, the authors reveal an empirical encoding scheme for visual orientation sufficient for optimal inference.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 The University of Queensland, School of Psychology, St Lucia, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
2 The University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 5934)
3 The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, St Lucia, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Cambridge, Department of Psychology, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 5934); The University of Sydney, School of Psychology, Camperdown, Australia (GRID:grid.1013.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 834X)