It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Motivated by the recent report of room-temperature superconductivity at near-ambient pressure in N-doped lutetium hydride, we performed a comprehensive, detailed study of the phase diagram of the Lu–N–H system, looking for superconducting phases. We combined ab initio crystal structure prediction with ephemeral data-derived interatomic potentials to sample over 200,000 different structures. Out of the more than 150 structures predicted to be metastable within ~50 meV from the convex hull we identify 52 viable candidates for conventional superconductivity, for which we computed their superconducting properties from Density Functional Perturbation Theory. Although for some of these structures we do predict a finite superconducting Tc, none is even remotely compatible with room-temperature superconductivity as reported by Dasenbrock et al. Our work joins the broader community effort that has followed the report of near-ambient superconductivity, confirming beyond reasonable doubt that no conventional mechanism can explain the reported Tc in Lu–N–H.
Superconductivity was recently reported experimentally in nitrogen-doped lutetium hydride with Tc = 294 K at a pressure of 1 GPa. Here, via theoretical calculations, the authors find no structures capable of supporting conventional superconductivity in the Lu-N-H system at ambient pressure.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, DEMAR, Lorena, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722); Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, Institute of Theoretical and Computational Physics, Graz, Austria (GRID:grid.410413.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 748X)
2 University of Cambridge, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, Cambridge, UK (GRID:grid.5335.0) (ISNI:0000 0001 2188 5934); Tohoku University, Advanced Institute for Materials Research, Sendai, Japan (GRID:grid.69566.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 6943)
3 Sapienza Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Fisica, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.7841.a); Enrico Fermi Research Center, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.7841.a)
4 Sapienza Università di Roma, Dipartimento di Fisica, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.7841.a); Wien University of Technology, Institut für Festkörperphysik, Wien, Austria (GRID:grid.5329.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0669)
5 Graz University of Technology, NAWI Graz, Institute of Theoretical and Computational Physics, Graz, Austria (GRID:grid.410413.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2294 748X)
6 Universidade de São Paulo, Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, DEMAR, Lorena, Brazil (GRID:grid.11899.38) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0722)