It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Intestinal obstruction is considered a frequent surgical pathology related to previous surgical procedures. Many different factors can lead to different outcomes when surgical management is needed. Therefore, we aim to describe the factors related to morbidity and mortality in surgical management of IO in a single-center experience. Retrospective observational study with a prospective database, in which we described patients who underwent surgical management due to intestinal obstruction between 2004 and 2015. Demographics, perioperative data, surgical outcomes, morbidity, and mortality were described. 366 patients were included. Female were 54.6%. Mean age was 61.26. Laparoscopic approach was done in 21.8% and the conversion rate was 17.2%. Intestinal resection was performed in 37.9% of the cases. Postoperative complications were observed in 18.85%. Reintervention and mortality were 9.5% and 4.1% respectively. Laparoscopic approach shows lesser time of intestinal transit (mean 28.67 vs. mean 41.95 h), and restart of oral intake after surgery (mean 96.06 vs. mean 119.65) compared with open approach. Increased heart rate and intensive care unit length of stay were related with mortality (p 0.01 and 0.000 respectively). For morbidity, laparotomy and need and duration of ICU stay were related with any complication statistically significant (p 0.02, 0.008, 0.000 respectively). Patients with increased heart rate in the emergency room, decreased amount of intravenous fluids, need and higher length of stay in the intensive care unit, and delay in resuming oral intake after surgery appear to have poor outcomes. Laparoscopic approach seems to be a safe and feasible approach for intestinal obstruction in selected patients.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Department of Surgery, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia (GRID:grid.418089.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0620 2607); Universidad del Rosario, School of Medicine, Bogotá D.C, Colombia (GRID:grid.412191.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2205 5940); Universidad de los Andes, School of Medicine, Bogotá D.C, Colombia (GRID:grid.7247.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0714)
2 Universidad del Rosario, School of Medicine, Bogotá D.C, Colombia (GRID:grid.412191.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2205 5940)
3 Universidad de los Andes, School of Medicine, Bogotá D.C, Colombia (GRID:grid.7247.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0714)
4 Fundación Santa Fé de Bogotá, Department of Surgery, Bogotá, D.C, Colombia (GRID:grid.418089.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 0620 2607); Universidad de los Andes, School of Medicine, Bogotá D.C, Colombia (GRID:grid.7247.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0714)