It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Memory consolidation after learning involves spontaneous, brain-wide network reorganization during rest and sleep, but how this is achieved is still poorly understood. Current theory suggests that the hippocampus is pivotal for this reshaping of connectivity. Using fMRI in male mice, we identify that a different set of spontaneous networks and their hubs are instrumental in consolidating memory during post-learning rest. We found that two types of spatial memory training invoke distinct functional connections, but that a network of the sensory cortex and subcortical areas is common for both tasks. Furthermore, learning increased brain-wide network integration, with the prefrontal, striatal and thalamic areas being influential for this network-level reconfiguration. Chemogenetic suppression of each hub identified after learning resulted in retrograde amnesia, confirming the behavioral significance. These results demonstrate the causal and functional roles of resting-state network hubs in memory consolidation and suggest that a distributed network beyond the hippocampus subserves this process.
How long-lasting memory is formed remains incompletely understood. Here, using fMRI and hub silencing, the authors discovered causal network hubs that are instrumental in consolidating memory and contributing to network reorganization.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537)
2 The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); Southern University of Science and Technology, Joint Center for Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, and Department of Biology, Shenzhen, PR China (GRID:grid.263817.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1773 1790)
3 The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, Clem Jones Centre for Ageing Dementia Research, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Edinburgh, UK Dementia Research Institute, Centre for Discovery Brain Sciences, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988)
4 The University of Queensland, Queensland Brain Institute, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); The University of Queensland, Centre of Advanced Imaging, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9320 7537); Australian Research Council Training Centre for Innovation in Biomedical Imaging Technology, Brisbane, Australia (GRID:grid.1003.2)