It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Ophiolites occur widely in orogenic belts, yet their origins remain controversial. Here we present a modern example with a geodynamic model from Timor, eastern Indonesia, where Earth’s youngest supra-subduction zone (SSZ)-type ophiolitic fragments are exposed. Zircon U-Pb ages and geochemical data indicate a short timespan (~10 to 8 Ma) for the magmatic sequence with boninitic and tholeiitic arc compositions. We interpret the Timor ophiolite as part of the infant Banda arc-forearc complex, which formed with the opening of the North Banda Sea and subsequent arc-continent collision along the irregular Australian continental margin. Our study connects the occurrence of small, short-lived ocean basins in the western Pacific with orogens around the globe where ephemeral SSZ-type ophiolites occur. These orogenic ophiolites do not represent preexisting oceanic crust, but result from upper-plate processes in early orogenesis and thus mark the onset of collision zone magmatism.
The Timor ophiolites, part of the young Banda arc-forearc, experienced only a short magmatic history between 8 and 10 million years ago before being rapidly emplaced onto the Australian margin, according to zircon U-Pb geochronology
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.28665.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 1366); Natural History Museum, Earth Sciences Department, London, UK (GRID:grid.35937.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2270 9879)
2 Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.28665.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 1366); National Taiwan University, Department of Geosciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.19188.39) (ISNI:0000 0004 0546 0241)
3 Tokyo Institute of Technology, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Tokyo, Japan (GRID:grid.32197.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 2179 2105)
4 University of Indonesia, Department of Geosciences, Jakarta, Indonesia (GRID:grid.9581.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2019 1471)
5 Academia Sinica, Institute of Earth Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan (GRID:grid.28665.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2287 1366)