It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Severe hypoxia would aggravate the acute kidney injury (AKI) in high-altitude areas and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) has been used to treat critically ill patients with AKI. However, the characteristics and outcomes of CRRT in critically ill patients at AKI in high altitudes and the optimal timing of CRRT initiation remain unclear. 1124 patients were diagnosed with AKI and treated with CRRT in the ICU, comprising a high-altitude group (n = 648) and low-altitude group (n = 476). Compared with the low-altitude group, patients with AKI at high altitude showed longer CRRT (4.8 vs. 3.7, P = 0.036) and more rapid progression of AKI stages (P < 0.01), but without any significant minor or major bleeding episodes (P > 0.05). Referring to the analysis of survival and kidney recovery curves, a higher mortality but a lower possibility of renal recovery was observed in the high-altitude group (P < 0.001). However, in the high-altitude group, the survival rate of early CRRT initiation was significantly higher than that of delayed CRRT initiation (P < 0.001). The findings showed poorer clinical outcomes in patients undergoing CRRT for AKI at high altitudes. CRRT at high altitudes was unlikely to increase the adverse events. Moreover, early CRRT initiation might reduce the mortality and promote renal recovery in high-altitude patients.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 General Hospital of Tibet Military Command, Intensive Care Center, Lhasa, China (GRID:grid.440258.f); General Hospital of Tibet Military Command, Department of Emergency, Lhasa, China (GRID:grid.440258.f)
2 Hospital of Chengdu Office of People’s Government of Tibetan Autonomous Region, Intensive Care Center, Chengdu, China (GRID:grid.440258.f)
3 People’s Hospital of Tibet Autonomous Region, Intensive Care Center, Lhasa, China (GRID:grid.443476.6)
4 General Hospital of Tibet Military Command, Intensive Care Center, Lhasa, China (GRID:grid.440258.f)
5 General Hospital of Tibet Military Command, Intensive Care Center, Lhasa, China (GRID:grid.440258.f); General Hospital of Tibet Military Command, Department of Emergency, Lhasa, China (GRID:grid.440258.f); Naval Medical Center of PLA, Department of Emergency, Shanghai, China (GRID:grid.440258.f)