It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The reactive transport code CrunchClay was used to derive effective diffusion coefficients (De), clay porosities (ε), and adsorption distribution coefficients (KD) from through-diffusion data while considering accurately the influence of unavoidable experimental biases on the estimation of these diffusion parameters. These effects include the presence of filters holding the solid sample in place, the variations in concentration gradients across the diffusion cell due to sampling events, the impact of tubing/dead volumes on the estimation of diffusive fluxes and sample porosity, and the effects of O-ring-filter setups on the delivery of solutions to the clay packing. Doing so, the direct modeling of the measurements of (radio)tracer concentrations in reservoirs is more accurate than that of data converted directly into diffusive fluxes. While the above-mentioned effects have already been described individually in the literature, a consistent modeling approach addressing all these issues at the same time has never been described nor made easily available to the community. A graphical user interface, CrunchEase, was created, which supports the user by automating the creation of input files, the running of simulations, and the extraction and comparison of data and simulation results. While a classical model considering an effective diffusion coefficient, a porosity and a solid/solution distribution coefficient (De–ε–KD) may be implemented in any reactive transport code, the development of CrunchEase makes it easy to apply by experimentalists without a background in reactive transport modeling. CrunchEase makes it also possible to transition more easily from a De–ε–KD modeling approach to a state-of-the-art process-based understanding modeling approach using the full capabilities of CrunchClay, which include surface complexation modeling and a multi-porosity description of the clay packing with charged diffuse layers.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth and Environmental Sciences Area, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551); Université d’Orléans−CNRS−BRGM, Institut des Sciences de la Terre d’Orléans, Orléans, France (GRID:grid.112485.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 0217 6921)
2 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Earth and Environmental Sciences Area, Berkeley, USA (GRID:grid.184769.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 2231 4551)
3 California State University East Bay, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Hayward, USA (GRID:grid.253557.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 3670)