It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Recent concurrent processes of vegetation greening and reduced resilience (the capacity to recover from disturbances) worldwide have brought many uncertainties into sustainable ecosystems in the future. However, little is known about the conditions and extent to which greening affects resilience changes. Here we assess both vegetation dynamics and resilience in China’s Loess Plateau from 2000 to 2020 using satellite-based vegetation data and an early warning indicator. Our results reveal an overall greening trend in vegetated areas, while resilience shifted from gains to losses at a breakpoint in 2010. Vegetation greening generally contributed to resilience gains, whereas increased temperature and precipitation variability contributed to the resilience loss observed in 2011–2020. These findings provide empirical evidence that vegetation greening does not necessarily correspond to an increase in resilience. We therefore recommend integrating resilience indicators into ecological restoration and conservation efforts to gain a more comprehensive understanding of vegetation states and support effective ecosystem stewardship.
Increased temperature and precipitation variability partially offset the greater ability of vegetation to recover from disturbances with the greening of the Chinese Loess Plateau in 2000–2020, resulting in a loss of resilience after 2010, suggests an analysis of satellite vegetation data.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.419052.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 2189); University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.410726.6) (ISNI:0000 0004 1797 8419)
2 Beijing Normal University, State Key Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, Faculty of Geographical Science, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.20513.35) (ISNI:0000 0004 1789 9964)
3 Stanford University, Natural Capital Project, Stanford, USA (GRID:grid.168010.e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8956)
4 Peking University, Institute of Ecology, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.11135.37) (ISNI:0000 0001 2256 9319)
5 School of Geography and Tourism of Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China (GRID:grid.412498.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1759 8395)