It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Worldwide, mountain glaciers are shrinking rapidly. Consequently, large areas are becoming available for the development of novel alpine ecosystems. These harsh environments, however, delay primary succession. In this study with a local community, we conducted an inclusion experiment to investigate whether Llama glama influences soils and vegetation primary succession following glacial retreat. At the foot of the Uruashraju glacier in the Cordillera Blanca, Peru (~ 4680 m.a.s.l.), we established four llama inclusion plots and four control plots that we studied from 2019 to 2022, 24–40 years after deglacierization. After three years, the llama plots had significantly increased soil organic carbon and soil nitrogen. In the llama plots, we found a large, significant increase in vascular plant cover (+ 57%) between the second and third years of experimentation, and we identified four new species that were not present in 2019. Our results suggest that Llama glama, through their latrine behavior and role as a seed disperser, enhances the primary succession and novel ecosystem formation in recently deglacierized landscapes. Our study provides scientific support that rewilding of native Andean camelids may favor adaptation to glacier retreat and inform conservation and management strategies in proglacial landscapes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Texas at Austin, Department of Geography and the Environment, Austin, USA (GRID:grid.89336.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9924)
2 Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Laboratorio de Florística, Departamento de Dicotiledóneas, Museo de Historia Natural, Lima, Peru (GRID:grid.10800.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4576)
3 Museo de Historia Natural. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Departamento de Etnobotánica y Botánica Económica, Lima, Peru (GRID:grid.10800.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4576)
4 Autoridad Nacional del Agua, Área de Evaluación de Glaciares y Lagunas, Huaraz, Peru (GRID:grid.10800.39); Universidad Nacional Santiago Antúnez de Mayolo, Huaraz, Peru (GRID:grid.441780.e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0164 4391)
5 AMAP, Univ Montpellier, IRD, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, Montpellier, France (GRID:grid.503016.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 2160 870X)