It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Social recognition memory (SRM) is a key determinant of social interactions. While the cerebellum emerges as an important region for social behavior, how cerebellar activity affects social functions remains unclear. We selectively increased the excitability of molecular layer interneurons (MLIs) to suppress Purkinje cell firing in the mouse cerebellar vermis. Chemogenetic perturbation of MLIs impaired SRM without affecting sociability, anxiety levels, motor coordination or object recognition. Optogenetic interference of MLIs during distinct phases of a social recognition test revealed the cerebellar engagement in the retrieval, but not encoding, of social information. c-Fos mapping after the social recognition test showed that cerebellar manipulation decreased brain-wide interregional correlations and altered network structure from medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus-centered to amygdala-centered modules. Anatomical tracing demonstrated hierarchical projections from the central cerebellum to the social brain network integrating amygdalar connections. Our findings suggest that the cerebellum organizes the neural matrix necessary for SRM.
Social memory integrates past experiences into social interactions by distinguishing familiar from novel conspecifics. In this study, the authors delineated a role of the cerebellum in organizing the neural matrix required for social memory.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details



1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000000419368657)
2 Nanyang Technological University, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore (GRID:grid.59025.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2224 0361)
3 University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, USA (GRID:grid.430503.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0703 675X)
4 Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, USA (GRID:grid.421185.b) (ISNI:0000 0004 0380 459X)
5 Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.412332.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1545 0811); Chronic Brain Injury, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA (GRID:grid.412332.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1545 0811)
6 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Minnesota Medical School, Duluth, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000000419368657); Department of Neuroscience, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8657)