It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Advancements in AI led to the emergence of in-memory-computing architectures as a promising solution for the associated computing and memory challenges. This study introduces a novel in-memory-computing (IMC) crossbar macro utilizing a multi-level ferroelectric field-effect transistor (FeFET) cell for multi-bit multiply and accumulate (MAC) operations. The proposed 1FeFET-1R cell design stores multi-bit information while minimizing device variability effects on accuracy. Experimental validation was performed using 28 nm HKMG technology-based FeFET devices. Unlike traditional resistive memory-based analog computing, our approach leverages the electrical characteristics of stored data within the memory cell to derive MAC operation results encoded in activation time and accumulated current. Remarkably, our design achieves 96.6% accuracy for handwriting recognition and 91.5% accuracy for image classification without extra training. Furthermore, it demonstrates exceptional performance, achieving 885.4 TOPS/W–nearly double that of existing designs. This study represents the first successful implementation of an in-memory macro using a multi-state FeFET cell for complete MAC operations, preserving crossbar density without additional structural overhead.
Designing efficient in-memory-computing architectures remains a challenge. Here the authors develop a multi-level FeFET crossbar for multi-bit MAC operations encoded in activation time and accumulated current with experimental validation at 28nm achieving 96.6% accuracy and high performance of 885 TOPS/W.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 Robert Bosch GmbH, Renningen, Germany (GRID:grid.6584.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0553 2276)
2 University of Stuttgart, Semiconducture Test and Reliability, Stuttgart, Germany (GRID:grid.5719.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9713); Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kanpur, India (GRID:grid.417965.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8702 0100)
3 Fraunhofer IPMS, Dresden, Germany (GRID:grid.469853.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 0412 8165)
4 RPTU Kaiserslautern-Landau, Kaiserslautern, Germany (GRID:grid.519840.1)
5 Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur, Department of Electrical Engineering, Kanpur, India (GRID:grid.417965.8) (ISNI:0000 0000 8702 0100)
6 Technical University of Munich; TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology; Chair of AI Processor Design; Munich Institute of Robotics and Machine Intelligence (MIRMI), Munich, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 2966)