It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Tropical forest recovery is fundamental to addressing the intertwined climate and biodiversity loss crises. While regenerating trees sequester carbon relatively quickly, the pace of biodiversity recovery remains contentious. Here, we use bioacoustics and metabarcoding to measure forest recovery post-agriculture in a global biodiversity hotspot in Ecuador. We show that the community composition, and not species richness, of vocalizing vertebrates identified by experts reflects the restoration gradient. Two automated measures – an acoustic index model and a bird community composition derived from an independently developed Convolutional Neural Network - correlated well with restoration (adj-R² = 0.62 and 0.69, respectively). Importantly, both measures reflected composition of non-vocalizing nocturnal insects identified via metabarcoding. We show that such automated monitoring tools, based on new technologies, can effectively monitor the success of forest recovery, using robust and reproducible data.
Cost-effective biodiversity monitoring through time is important for evidence-based conservation. Here, the authors show that automated bioacoustics monitoring can be used to track tropical forest recovery from agricultural abandonment, suggesting its use to assess restoration outcomes.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Rauhenebrach, Germany (GRID:grid.8379.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1958 8658); Bavarian Forest National Park, Grafenau, Germany (GRID:grid.452215.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 7590 7184)
2 Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Rauhenebrach, Germany (GRID:grid.8379.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1958 8658)
3 Fundación Jocotoco, Valladolid N24-414 y Luis Cordero, Quito, Ecuador (GRID:grid.8379.5)
4 Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Research Group, Technical University of Munich, School of Life Sciences, Freising, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2322 2966); Berchtesgaden National Park, Berchtesgaden, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a)
5 Saxon-Switzerland National Park, Bad Schandau, Germany (GRID:grid.6936.a)
6 Yanayacu Research Center, Cosanga, Ecuador (GRID:grid.8379.5)
7 Biodiversity Field Lab (BioFL), Khamai Foundation, Quito, Ecuador (GRID:grid.8379.5)
8 Pasaje El Moro E4-216 y Norberto Salazar, Tumbaco, Ecuador (GRID:grid.8379.5)
9 Rainforest Connection, Science Department, Katy, USA (GRID:grid.8379.5)
10 Technische Universität Darmstadt, Ecological Networks Lab, Department of Biology, Darmstadt, Germany (GRID:grid.6546.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 0940 1669)
11 Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Phyletisches Museum, Institute for Zoology and Evolutionary Research, Jena, Germany (GRID:grid.9613.d) (ISNI:0000 0001 1939 2794)
12 University of Bayreuth, Animal Population Ecology, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), Bayreuth, Germany (GRID:grid.7384.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 6972)
13 Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Field Station Fabrikschleichach, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Rauhenebrach, Germany (GRID:grid.8379.5) (ISNI:0000 0001 1958 8658); Medio Ambiente y Salud-BIOMAS-Universidad de las Américas, Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Quito, Ecuador (GRID:grid.442184.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0424 2170)
14 Medio Ambiente y Salud-BIOMAS-Universidad de las Américas, Grupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Quito, Ecuador (GRID:grid.442184.f) (ISNI:0000 0004 0424 2170); Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Quito, Ecuador (GRID:grid.440857.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 0485 2489)
15 AIM - Advanced Identification Methods GmbH, Leipzig, Germany (GRID:grid.440857.a)
16 University of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology and The Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675)