It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Seasonal variation in habitat use and animal behavior can alter host contact patterns with potential consequences for pathogen transmission dynamics. The endangered Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi) has experienced significant pathogen-induced mortality and continues to be at risk of future epidemics. Prior research has found increased panther movement in Florida’s dry versus wet seasons, which may affect panther population connectivity and seasonally increase potential pathogen transmission. Our objective was to determine if Florida panthers are more spatially connected in dry seasons relative to wet seasons, and test if identified connectivity differences resulted in divergent predicted epidemic dynamics. We leveraged extensive panther telemetry data to construct seasonal panther home range overlap networks over an 11 year period. We tested for differences in network connectivity, and used observed network characteristics to simulate transmission of a broad range of pathogens through dry and wet season networks. We found that panthers were more spatially connected in dry seasons than wet seasons. Further, these differences resulted in a trend toward larger and longer pathogen outbreaks when epidemics were initiated in the dry season. Our results demonstrate that seasonal variation in behavioral patterns—even among largely solitary species—can have substantial impacts on epidemic dynamics.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Minnesota, Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, St Paul, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8657); University of Wisconsin–Madison, Wisconsin Cooperative Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, Madison, USA (GRID:grid.14003.36) (ISNI:0000 0001 2167 3675)
2 University of Minnesota, Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, St Paul, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8657)
3 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Naples, USA (GRID:grid.427218.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0556 4516)
4 Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.427218.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 0556 4516)
5 Colorado State University, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Fort Collins, USA (GRID:grid.47894.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8083)
6 University of Minnesota, Department of Veterinary Population Medicine, St Paul, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8657); University of Minnesota, Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, St Paul, USA (GRID:grid.17635.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8657)




