It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The concealed information test (CIT) presents various probe (familiar) items amidst irrelevant (unfamiliar) items. When the probe items appear, reaction time (RT) slows down. This RT-CIT effect has been accounted for by a conflict resulting from the need to deny familiarity of the familiar probes. The present pre-registered study (n = 292) examined whether response conflict is sufficient to account for the RT-CIT effect, using city and name items. Specifically, we compared the common conflict condition, where the response buttons emphasized familiarity of CIT items (“unfamiliar” versus “familiar”), to a novel no conflict condition, where the buttons emphasized categorical membership (“city” versus “name”). In line with our expectations, the RT-CIT effect was substantially stronger in the conflict condition; yet, it remained significant even in the no conflict condition. This implies a critical role for response conflict, but also suggests that other mechanisms (e.g. orientation to significant stimuli) may contribute to the RT-CIT effect.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Bar-Ilan University, Department of Criminology, Ramat Gan, Israel (GRID:grid.22098.31) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0503)
2 Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel (GRID:grid.9619.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0538)
3 Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Psychology, Jerusalem, Israel (GRID:grid.9619.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1937 0538); University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 8499 2262)
4 University of Amsterdam, Department of Clinical Psychology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (GRID:grid.7177.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 8499 2262)