It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Controls on Mesoproterozoic ocean redox heterogeneity, and links to nutrient cycling and oxygenation feedbacks, remain poorly resolved. Here, we report ocean redox and phosphorus cycling across two high-resolution sections from the ~1.4 Ga Xiamaling Formation, North China Craton. In the lower section, fluctuations in trade wind intensity regulated the spatial extent of a ferruginous oxygen minimum zone, promoting phosphorus drawdown and persistent oligotrophic conditions. In the upper section, high but variable continental chemical weathering rates led to periodic fluctuations between highly and weakly euxinic conditions, promoting phosphorus recycling and persistent eutrophication. Biogeochemical modeling demonstrates how changes in geographical location relative to global atmospheric circulation cells could have driven these temporal changes in regional ocean biogeochemistry. Our approach suggests that much of the ocean redox heterogeneity apparent in the Mesoproterozoic record can be explained by climate forcing at individual locations, rather than specific events or step-changes in global oceanic redox conditions.
Regional ocean redox variability and associated nutrient cycling in the Mesoproterozoic can be explained by climate forcing at individual locations, rather than specific events or step-changes in global oceanic redox conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403)
2 University of Leeds, School of Earth and Environment, Leeds, UK (GRID:grid.9909.9) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8403); University of Edinburgh, School of GeoSciences, Edinburgh, UK (GRID:grid.4305.2) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 7988)
3 Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, China National Petroleum Corporation, Key Laboratory of Petroleum Geochemistry, Beijing, China (GRID:grid.464414.7) (ISNI:0000 0004 1765 2021)
4 University of Southern Denmark, Nordcee, Department of Biology, Odense, Denmark (GRID:grid.10825.3e) (ISNI:0000 0001 0728 0170)
5 University College London, Department of Earth Sciences, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201)