It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Due to its high energy density, lithium metal is a promising electrode for future energy storage. However, its practical capacity, cyclability and safety heavily depend on controlling its reactivity in contact with liquid electrolytes, which leads to the formation of a solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). In particular, there is a lack of fundamental mechanistic understanding of how the electrolyte composition impacts the SEI formation and its governing processes. Here, we present an in-depth model-based analysis of the initial SEI formation on lithium metal in a carbonate-based electrolyte. Thereby we reach for significantly larger length and time scales than comparable molecular dynamic studies. Our multiscale kinetic Monte Carlo/continuum model shows a layered, mostly inorganic SEI consisting of LiF on top of Li2CO3 and Li after 1 µs. Its formation is traced back to a complex interplay of various electrolyte and salt decomposition processes. We further reveal that low local Li+ concentrations result in a more mosaic-like, partly organic SEI and that a faster passivation of the lithium metal surface can be achieved by increasing the salt concentration. Based on this we suggest design strategies for SEI on lithium metal and make an important step towards knowledge-driven SEI engineering.
The application of Li metal electrodes in rechargeable batteries is limited by inherent high reactivity. Here, the authors provide model-based insights into the composition and formation mechanisms of the solid-electrolyte interphase on the µs-scale and suggest design strategies for the interphase.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
; Kuai, Dacheng 2 ; Gerasimov, Michail 1
; Röder, Fridolin 3
; Balbuena, Perla B. 4
; Krewer, Ulrike 1
1 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute for Applied Materials — Electrochemical Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany (GRID:grid.7892.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 0075 5874)
2 Texas A&M University, Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082); Texas A&M University, Department of Chemistry, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)
3 University of Bayreuth, Bavarian Center for Battery Technology (BayBatt), Bayreuth, Germany (GRID:grid.7384.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0467 6972)
4 Texas A&M University, Department of Chemical Engineering, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082); Texas A&M University, Department of Chemistry, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082); Texas A&M University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, College Station, USA (GRID:grid.264756.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4687 2082)




