1. Introduction
Rice is a one- to two-year-old herbaceous plant belonging to the Oryza genus of Poaceae, mainly divided into two subspecies: indica (Oryza sativa subsp. indica) and japonica (O. sativa subsp. japonica) [1]. Rice is one of the most important food crops in the world [2]. It can be divided into two types: ordinary rice and fragrant rice based on the presence of aroma. There are various fragrant rice varieties around the world, and they have different aroma characteristics. For example, jasmine rice from Thailand has a grass and citrus aroma [3], while Taiwanese fragrant rice (Tainung 71) has a taro aroma (Chen and Chiu, 2011) [4]. However, the aroma composition of fragrant rice with different aroma types is quite complex (Lu et al. 2023) [5].
At present, studies have proven that the key volatile compound 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline (2-AP), which makes fragrant rice produce a special aroma, is also the main factor affecting the smell of fragrant rice [6,7]. 2-AP is produced during rice growth and can usually be detected in its leaves, stems, and grains [8]. The content of 2-AP will affect the aroma intensity of fragrant rice, and its content will decrease with storage time and temperature [9]. In addition, during the storage of fragrant rice, the key volatile compound 2-AP is significantly reduced, while lipid oxidation products are significantly increased [10].
Storage is one of the main factors affecting aroma components [11,12] and affects the composition of its aroma, and aroma is an important indicator of fragrant rice. Therefore, the purpose of this experiment was to explore the differences in the volatile components of different fragrant rice varieties and different storage times. It is hoped that this research can lead to a more in-depth study on the fragrant rice produced in Taiwan and provide an important reference for the agriculture and breeding of fragrant rice in the future.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Chemicals
The analytical standards used for the identification of the aroma compounds in fragrant rice included 1-Hexanol, 1-Octanol, 1-Octen-3-ol, Hexanal, Nonanal, 1-Hexanol, 1-Heptanal, Decanal, α-Pinene, 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline, and alkanes (C5–C25), all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The internal standard, 2,4,6-Trimethylpyridine, was purchased from Chem Service (West Chester, PA, USA).
2.2. Plant Materials
A total of four varieties of fragrant rice from Taiwan were used in this study (Table 1): Taikeng No. 4 (TK4), Tainung No. 71 (TN71), Kaohsiung No. 147 (KH147), and Taichung No. 194 (TC194). Four varieties of fragrant rice were provided by the Hualien District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Ministry of Agriculture. The identities of the plants were confirmed by Jui-Chia Lee. The samples were harvested in June 2021, and the milling degree was 85%, which was obtained after milling the brown rice. After milling, all samples were stored in hermetically sealed packages at 4 °C.
2.3. Method
2.3.1. HS-SPME Extraction Conditions
The method used was modified from those of Dias et al. [13]:
Comparisons of the extraction fibers: Five different extraction fibers, 100 μm polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), 85 μm polyacrylate (PA), 75 μm carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (CAR/PDMS), 65 μm polydimethylsiloxane/divinylbenzene (PDMS/DVB), and 50/30 μm divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) (Supelco, Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA) were used for the aroma extraction. The samples (TC194) were placed into a homogenizer (Giaretti, GL-9237, Milan, Italy). After being homogenized for 30 s, 5 g of the homogenized samples was put into a 15 mL vial (Supelco, Inc., No. 27159, Bellefonte, PA, USA) and sealed before being extracted in a water bath at 80 °C for 18 min. After sampling, each fiber was immediately inserted into the GC and GC-MS. This experiment was repeated in triplicate.
Comparisons of the extraction times: The above-mentioned optimal extraction fiber was used in the comparison of the extraction times. The extraction times were 14, 18, 22, 26, and 30 min to determine the optimal extraction conditions. After sampling, each fiber was immediately inserted into the GC and GC-MS.
Analysis of aroma components in different fragrant rice varieties: Take TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 fragrant rice as samples. Crush them with a homogenizer, weigh 5 g of powder, and use the above-mentioned HS-SPME under optimal experimental conditions.
Analysis of the aroma components of fragrant rice at different storage times: This experimental method is referred to and modified from Choi et al. [14]. TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 were used as samples, stored for 0, 1, 2, 4, and 6 months in sequence, and then extracted and analyzed using the above-mentioned HS-SPME optimal condition experimental method.
2.3.2. Gas Chromatography (GC)
The instrument used was the model 7890A GC of the Agilent Company (Santa Clara, CA, USA), and it was matched with the company’s DB-1 (60 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm) separation column; the heating condition was an initial temperature of 40 °C, maintained for 1 min, then raised to 150 °C at 5 °C/min, maintained for 1 min, and finally raised to 200 °C at 10 °C/min, which was maintained for 11 min. The detector used was the Flame Ionization Detector (FID), the injection mode was the splitless mode, the temperature of the injection port was 250 °C, and the temperature of the detector was 300 °C. The carrier gas used was nitrogen, and the gas flow rate was 1.0 mL/min.
2.3.3. Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)
The instrument used was an Agilent Company (Santa Clara, CA, USA) model 7890B GC connected in series with a 5977A quadrupole column mass spectrometer (Mass Selective Detector, MSD; Santa Clara, CA, USA). The operating conditions and columns of the GC were the same as those of the aforementioned GC, the electron energy was 70 eV at 230 °C, and the temperature of the quadrupole column was 150 °C. The carrier gas used was changed to helium. The mass spectrum data were compared with Wiley 7N mass spectrum library.
2.3.4. Retention Index (RI)
The GC-retention index of the volatile compounds in this experiment was based on a mixture of C5–C25 n-alkanes (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and the GC retention time under the same conditions as a reference, and calculated according to the method of Van Den Dool and Kratz [15].
Its retention index formula is as follows:
Ix = 100n + 100(tx − tn)/(tn+1 − tn)
where tn and tn+1 represent the residence time of n-alkanes before and after compound elution-
n = carbon number of n-alkanes
-
tx = residence time of the compound
-
x = indicates an unknown compound
2.3.5. Statistical Analysis
The data were subjected to a mono-factorial variance analysis, with Duncan’s multiple range method used by a significance of differences of p < 0.05 (SPSS Base 12.0).
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Comparisons of the Optimization Conditions of HS-SPME
3.1.1. HS-SPME Fiber Selection
Before extracting volatile compounds, the fiber coating type will be selected according to the properties and requirements of the volatile compounds [13]. Therefore, to obtain the best extraction fibers, this experiment used five different extraction fibers to absorb fragrant rice for 18 min at a water bath temperature of 80 °C. The results showed that 100 μm PDMS and 85 μm PA were less suitable for extracting volatile compounds from fragrant rice, while 65 μm PDMS/DVB had the best extraction effect compared with 75 μm CAR/PDMS and 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS, and had a higher total volatile compound content and component quantity (Table 2).
Peng et al. [16] used three different extraction fibers (100 μm PDMS, 75 μm CAR/PDMS, and 65 μm PDMS/DVB) to analyze the volatile compounds of four fragrant rice spices, and the results showed that 65 μm PDMS/DVB fibers had the best extraction performance. According to the literature, PDMS is a nonpolar coating. If it is combined with polar coating DVB or CAR, it can not only increase the extraction effect, but also adsorb a wider range of volatile compounds with different polarities [17]. Dias et al. [13] noted that 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS fibers are more widely used to extract volatile compounds in rice because they can absorb more volatile compounds of different polarities. Although 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS fibers outperformed 65 μm PDMS/DVB fibers, 65 μm PDMS/DVB fibers were preferred because of the observed residual problem. However, when using 65 μm PDMS/DVB fibers, no residual problems were shown [18].
According to the preliminary experimental results and the discussion of the above literature, 65 μm PDMS/DVB fiber was selected as the extraction fiber for HS-SPME in this experiment. Compared with other extraction fibers, this fiber has the best extraction effect and can be used to analyze more fragrant rice aroma components.
3.1.2. HS-SPME Extraction Time
Based on the test results of the HS-SPME fiber, in this experiment, the 65 μm PDMS/DVB extraction fiber with the best extraction effect was used to extract fragrant rice for 14, 18, 22, 26, and 30 min in a water bath at a temperature of 80 °C. The results (Figure 1) showed that the content of total volatile compounds had a tendency to increase significantly from 14 to 18 min of extraction time, but not after 22 to 30 min, and there was no significant difference (p < 0.05).
Lim et al. [19] analyzed the volatile compounds of white rice and extracted the samples for 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 min. The research results showed that as the extraction time increased, the number of peaks decreased. According to the literature, shorter extraction times are more suitable for volatile compounds, while longer extraction times are more favorable for less volatile compounds [20]. In addition, the water molecules present in the headspace are also adsorbed by the fibers during extraction, especially at higher temperatures, so longer extraction times may cause more water to accumulate on the fibers and thus reduce extraction efficiency [16]. Choi et al. [21] analyzed the volatile compounds of black rice with 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS and adsorbed them in the headspace at 80 °C for 18 min. Therefore, the experimental results of this experiment are the same as the experimental results of Choi et al. [21]. The optimal extraction condition for fragrant rice is 80 °C for 18 min, which can absorb more aroma components and meet the analysis efficiency in actual operation.
3.2. Volatile Compounds of Different Varieties of Fragrant Rice
In this experiment, HS-SPME was used to extract the volatile compounds of TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 fragrant rice, and GC-MS was used to identify and compare the composition differences (Figure 2). In Taiwan, TK4, TN71, and KH147 are generally considered to have a taro aroma, while TC194 is considered to have a popcorn aroma. The results of this experiment show that among the white rice samples of the four fragrant rice varieties, the highest content of all samples is Nonanal (1293.32–3521.70), which is one of the most important components in many rice varieties (Table 3).
The content of 2-AP was the highest in TK4 (14.36), followed by TC194 (11.32), KH147 (8.46), and TN71 (7.52). Champagne [22] pointed out that there is no single compound that can represent the characteristic aroma of fragrant rice, except for 2-AP, which could be produced by the interaction of multiple volatile compounds.
Moreover, 2-AP has the aroma of popcorn [23], and exists in some other foods, such as corn, wheat, barley, sorghum, and even taro. Therefore, 2-AP is sometimes also classified as one of the components of the taro aroma [24], while in Taiwan, some farmers believe that TK4, TN71, and KH147 have a taro aroma, and TC194 is considered to have a popcorn aroma, but in the study, all four samples contained 2-AP with little difference in content. Therefore, the speculation is only the subjective aroma perception of farmers.
Zhao et al. [3] identified jasmine rice by the odor activity value (OAV) and detection frequency analysis (DFA), and indicated that Hexanal, Octanal, Nonanal, (E)-2-Octenal, and Decanal were the odor-active components of jasmine rice. Liu and Yang [25] used HS-SPME combined with GC-MS to investigate the influence of Yihchuan fragrant rice on volatile compounds under different milling conditions, and pointed out that Hexanal, Nonanal, Benzaldehyde, 1-Octen-3-ol, Geranylacetone, 2-Pentylfuran, and 2-AP are commonly found in the aroma profiles of fragrant rice and taro, and suggested that these volatile compounds may contribute to the taro-like flavor in fragrant rice, and the results are similar to the ingredients in this experiment (Figure 3). Hexanal and Decanal are aldehydes, which are the decomposition products of oleic acid and linolenic acid [26]. Among them, TN71 has the highest content of Hexanal, followed by TC194, KH147, and TK4. In addition, Hexanal has a grassy taste [12]. Decantal has a citrus peel-like smell [27]. Benzaldehyde has an almond fragrance [28]. In addition, 1-Octen-3-ol is a product of lipid oxidation and has an earthy and mushroomy smell [17], while 2-Pentylfuran is the reaction product of lipoxygenase (Lipoxygenase) [29], and has bean and nutty flavors [30]. Geranylacetone has a floral and fruity aroma [31], and among the four varieties, TC194 has the lowest Geranylacetone content.
In addition, TK4 contains a fairly high content of hydrocarbons, including Tridecane and Dodecane, and most of the hydrocarbons have a high threshold and have no significant impact on the overall aroma characteristics [32]. Based on the above and the experimental results, TN71, KH147, and TC194 are dominated by aldehydes, followed by hydrocarbons; TK4 is contrary to this result as it is dominated by hydrocarbons, followed by aldehydes.
3.3. Effects of Storage Time of Different Fragrant Rice Varieties on Aroma Components
HS-SPME was used to analyze and compare the aroma components of four fragrant rice varieties with different storage times. The results (Table 4, Table 5, Table 6, Table 7 and Table 8, Figure 4) showed that a total of 30 aroma components were identified, including 11 aliphatic hydrocarbons, 5 aliphatic alcohols, 5 aliphatic aldehydes, 1 aromatic aldehyde, 1 ketone, 1 lactone, 1 furan, 1 pyridine, 3 monoterpenes, and 1 sesquiterpene. Among them, aldehydes are the most important volatile compounds, and the content is the highest at the 0th month, but the aldehydes in the white rice of the four fragrant rice varieties all have a tendency to decrease significantly after storage. The aldehydes reached their lowest in the 6th month, among which the decline trend of Nonanal was the most obvious for this kind of compound, and TK4 decreased from 1293.32 to 261.11 in the 6th month; TN71 decreased from 3521.70 to 620.06 in the 6th month; KH147 decreased from 2218.19 to 375.99 in the 6th month; and TC194 decreased from 2968.41 to 866.89 in the 6th month. The content of hydrocarbons TK4 and TN71 was the highest at the 0th month, and there was an obvious trend of decline after storage, while that of TC194 showed a trend of increase. The aliphatic aldehydes tended to decrease after storage. According to Choi et al. [14], storage at higher temperatures can lead to an increase in the content of aldehydes (such as Nonanal), while lower temperatures can retard lipid oxidation. In addition, alcohols are considered to be the by-products of unsaturated fatty acid oxidation and formed by the further decomposition of aldehydes [9]. At the same time, alcohols are also minor volatile compounds in rice (second only to aldehydes) [33]. In this experiment, the alcohol compounds of all samples were significantly increased after storage, among which the content of 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol was the highest, and TK4 increased from 193.42 to 694.02 in the 6th month; TN71 rose from 99.02 to 323.87 in the 6th month; KH147 rose from 156.85 to 700.13 in the 6th month; and TC194 rose from 296.93 to 566.54 in the 6th month.
However, the content of ketones, lactones, furans, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes increased after storage, and reached the highest at the 6th month. After the storage of monoterpenes, β-Pinene was formed in the 1st month and α-Pinene was formed in the 2nd month, and its content rose to the highest in the 6th month. In the study of Bao et al. [34], monoterpene compounds such as α-pinene, β-pinene, myrcene, and limonene were indicated as biogenic volatile organic compounds emitted from rice. The results of this experiment also detected α-pinene, β-pinene, and limonene, among which the content of limonene was the highest.
In addition, with the increase in storage time, the content of 2-AP, TK4 content was the highest before storage, and the lowest after storage in the 6th month, TN71 and TC194 had the highest content in the 2nd month of storage, and gradually decreased in the 3rd month, while the content of KH147 was the highest in the 1st month, and gradually decreased in the 2nd month. Compared with the results of Tananuwong and Lertsiri [10], it was found that except for the 2-AP content of TK4, which gradually decreased with the increasing storage time, the 2-AP content of other varieties did not change significantly during different storage periods.
4. Conclusions
In this study, the optimal adsorption condition for the HS-SPME analysis of fragrant rice aroma compounds was extraction using a 65 μm PDMS/DVB fiber at 80 °C for 18 min. Among the TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 samples, the common main component is Nonanal. TN71, KH147, and TC194 are dominated by aldehydes, followed by hydrocarbons; TK4 is dominated by hydrocarbons, followed by aldehydes. Aldehydes are the most important volatile compounds during different storage periods, and their content tends to decrease significantly after storage, while the content of alcohols increases after storage. In addition, after storage, the 2-AP content in TK4 will gradually decrease.
Conceptualization, J.-C.L., W.-M.J. and H.-C.C.; methodology, J.-C.L. and W.-M.J.; validation, J.-C.L. and H.-C.C.; formal analysis, J.-C.L. and W.-M.J.; investigation, K.-M.Y., H.-C.C. and C.-S.W., data curation, K.-M.Y., writing—original draft preparation, W.-M.J. and H.-C.C.; writing—review and editing, J.-C.L., C.-S.W., L.-P.C., W.-M.J. and H.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Not applicable.
Not applicable.
Data sharing not applicable. No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.
Financial support from the Ministry of Agriculture (Taiwan) (112A013-A) and Ministry of Education (Taiwan) (1038142*) are gratefully acknowledged.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
Enlarge this image.Figure 1. Total peak areas of fragrant rice with the 65 μm PDMS/DVB fiber at different adsorption times. Values are means ± SD of triplicates. Values with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Enlarge this image.Figure 2. GC chromatograms of volatile compounds from TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 determined by HS-SPME. (a) TK4; (b) TN71; (c) KH147; (d) TC194.
Enlarge this image.Figure 3. The aroma compounds from TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 determined by HS-SPME. Values are means ± SD of triplicates. Values with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Enlarge this image.Figure 4. Analysis of volatile compounds in TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 with different storage times by HS-SPME. Values are means ± SD of triplicates. Values with different superscripts are significantly (p < 0.05) different.
Planting information for the fragrant rice used in this study.
| Varieties | Growing Locality |
|---|---|
| Taikeng No. 4 | Fuli Township, Hualien County |
| Tainung No. 71 | Yuli Township, Hualien County |
| Kaohsiung No. 147 | Fuli Township, Hualien County |
| Taichung No. 194 | Fuli Township, Hualien County |
Comparisons of the total peak areas of total volatile compounds detected in the headspace of TC194 using different HS-SPME fibers.
| HS-SPME Fibers | Peaks | Total Peak Areas |
|---|---|---|
| 100 μm PDMS | 13 | 3818 |
| 85 μm PA | 8 | 2228 |
| 75 μm CAR/PDMS | 16 | 4560 |
| 65 μm PDMS/DVB | 30 | 8051 |
| 50/30 μm DVB/CAR/PDMS | 27 | 4827 |
The volatile compounds from TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 determined by HS-SPME.
| Compound | RI a | Peak Areas | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TK4 | TN71 | KH147 | TC194 | ||
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | |||||
| Undecane | 1100 | 37.32 ± 2.05 | 6.77 ± 1.64 | 7.19 ± 1.37 | 8.91 ± 1.95 |
| Dodecane | 1200 | 519.63 ± 28.80 | 138.59 ± 9.73 | 121.52 ± 6.73 | 195.16 ± 4.61 |
| 1-Tridecene | 1284 | 139.24 ± 8.05 | 35.69 ± 4.20 | 30.79 ± 1.51 | 34.84 ± 2.63 |
| Tridecane | 1300 | 775.05 ± 34.92 | 167.93 ± 13.34 | 329.48 ± 15.38 | 479.94 ± 18.01 |
| 3-Methyltridecane | 1368 | 119.52 ± 8.87 | 30.07 ± 4.74 | 28.27 ± 1.26 | 70.04 ± 3.66 |
| 1-Tetradecene | 1384 | 80.02 ± 6.97 | 94.17 ± 9.86 | 81.38 ± 2.38 | 22.50 ± 4.44 |
| Tetradecane | 1400 | 164.32 ± 6.16 | 173.83 ± 7.19 | 315.59 ± 15.66 | 194.14 ± 8.93 |
| 1-Pentadecene | 1483 | 160.22 ± 9.95 | 101.81 ± 9.56 | 108.68 ± 8.59 | 42.07 ± 9.45 |
| Pentadecane | 1500 | 176.16 ± 9.21 | 105.21 ± 10.74 | 102.80 ± 8.01 | 92.69 ± 7.41 |
| Hexadecane | 1600 | 133.52 ± 13.62 | 86.43 ± 7.95 | 116.24 ± 9.38 | 88.26 ± 4.03 |
| Heptadecane | 1700 | 51.35 ± 1.36 | 38.86 ± 2.11 | 28.38 ± 2.01 | 15.34 ± 1.18 |
| Aliphatic alcohols | |||||
| 1-Hexanol | 847 | 37.89 ± 2.07 | 62.34 ± 13.14 | 173.47 ± 14.68 | 58.31 ± 2.49 |
| 1-Hptanol | 942 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | - b | - | - |
| 1-Octanol | 1040 | 119.47 ± 9.15 | 177.14 ± 11.97 | 163.11 ± 10.94 | 138.29 ± 7.27 |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 953 | 169.84 ± 12.09 | 172.93 ± 7.22 | 105.86 ± 9.39 | 179.08 ± 11.64 |
| 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 998 | 193.42 ± 6.33 | 99.02 ± 4.61 | 156.85 ± 8.56 | 296.93 ± 14.82 |
| Aliphatic aldehydes | |||||
| Hexanal | 772 | 334.75 ± 19.30 | 675.27 ± 28.65 | 427.22 ± 19.25 | 476.69 ± 26.50 |
| Heptanal | 874 | 65.30 ± 5.97 | 75.82 ± 4.47 | 53.77 ± 3.59 | 78.84 ± 5.24 |
| Nonanal | 1070 | 1293.32 ± 41.87 | 3521.70 ± 49.41 | 2218.19 ± 79.14 | 2968.41 ± 53.73 |
| (E)-2-Nonenal | 1123 | 182.64 ± 6.55 | 302.59 ± 15.96 | 133.65 ± 8.43 | 409.08 ± 11.81 |
| Decanal | 1174 | 168.31 ± 7.31 | 175.88 ± 12.56 | 134.01 ± 12.40 | 171.60 ± 9.90 |
| Aromatic aldehyde | |||||
| Benzaldehyde | 923 | 43.52 ± 4.40 | 47.17 ± 3.49 | 28.68 ± 1.53 | 36.48 ± 1.32 |
| Ketone | |||||
| 2-Heptanone | 860 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | - | - |
| Lactone | |||||
| Geranylacetone | 1415 | 99.71 ± 7.82 | 68.59 ± 7.56 | 54.60 ± 8.24 | 45.35 ± 3.56 |
| Furan | |||||
| 2-Pentylfuran | 970 | 107.49 ± 12.17 | 118.72 ± 18.70 | 82.13 ± 11.84 | 90.82 ± 13.96 |
| Pyridine | |||||
| 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline | 886 | 14.36 ± 2.59 | 7.52 ± 0.66 | 8.46 ± 1.69 | 11.32 ± 1.79 |
| Monoterpene | |||||
| Limonene | 1011 | 51.17 ± 4.01 | 18.40 ± 2.57 | 30.77 ± 1.81 | 45.66 ± 5.75 |
| Sesquiterpene | |||||
| Longifolene | 1406 | 113.03 ± 9.15 | 120.29 ± 10.91 | 108.04 ± 8.13 | 74.41 ± 2.00 |
| Total | 5350.84 ± 496.58 | 6623.03 ± 633.52 | 5149.13 ± 511.44 | 6325.16 ± 679.85 | |
a Rentention indices, using paraffin (C5–C25) as references; b undectable.
Analysis of volatile compounds in TK4 with different storage times by HS-SPME.
| Compound | RI a | Peak Areas | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 M b | 1 M | 2 M | 4 M | 6 M | ||
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | ||||||
| Undecane | 1100 | 37.32 ± 2.05 | 28.12 ± 3.01 | 20.59 ± 2.16 | 29.41 ± 2.32 | 31.71 ± 5.72 |
| Dodecane | 1200 | 519.63 ± 28.80 | 203.69 ± 12.68 | 189.66 ± 16.51 | 110.02 ± 13.60 | 80.97 ± 9.28 |
| 1-Tridecene | 1284 | 139.24 ± 8.05 | 83.91 ± 3.41 | 78.93 ± 2.82 | 84.58 ± 2.61 | 91.34 ± 4.35 |
| Tridecane | 1300 | 775.05 ± 34.92 | 490.22 ± 30.49 | 379.04 ± 25.35 | 273.32 ± 16.56 | 133.97 ± 24.78 |
| 3-Methyltridecane | 1368 | 119.52 ± 8.87 | 106.97 ± 2.87 | 93.46 ± 5.87 | 70.22 ± 6.56 | 62.06 ± 8.16 |
| 1-Tetradecene | 1384 | 80.02 ± 6.97 | 86.64 ± 8.20 | 85.64 ± 2.40 | 85.64 ± 2.12 | 85.64 ± 4.61 |
| Tetradecane | 1400 | 164.32 ± 6.16 | 157.12 ± 5.24 | 142.06 ± 12.97 | 137.97 ± 9.37 | 129.24 ± 2.34 |
| 1-Pentadecene | 1483 | 160.22 ± 9.95 | 169.65 ± 4.76 | 130.97 ± 13.86 | 124.54 ± 14.28 | 106.32 ± 12.30 |
| Pentadecane | 1500 | 176.16 ± 9.21 | 167.12 ± 12.83 | 155.63 ± 4.25 | 140.11 ± 5.20 | 117.36 ± 7.46 |
| Hexadecane | 1600 | 133.52 ± 13.62 | 140.38 ± 4.28 | 135.29 ± 8.05 | 140.43 ± 14.65 | 134.65 ± 5.63 |
| Heptadecane | 1700 | 51.35 ± 1.36 | 46.22 ± 2.78 | 51.68 ± 0.96 | 45.84 ± 3.12 | 45.84 ± 1.49 |
| Aliphatic alcohols | ||||||
| 1-Hexanol | 847 | 37.89 ± 2.07 | 33.25 ± 1.42 | 30.78 ± 2.77 | 25.18 ± 2.81 | 24.46 ± 1.60 |
| 1-Hptanol | 942 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 5.16 ± 0.84 | 9.16 ± 1.08 | 15.79 ± 1.45 | 20.20 ± 2.73 |
| 1-Octanol | 1040 | 119.47 ± 9.15 | 125.02 ± 9.66 | 124.47 ± 8.21 | 120.62 ± 11.17 | 121.76 ± 6.54 |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 953 | 169.84 ± 12.09 | 123.49 ± 15.39 | 115.06 ± 7.43 | 109.78 ± 10.38 | 97.09 ± 13.63 |
| 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 998 | 193.42 ± 6.33 | 639.25 ± 18.16 | 658.58 ± 17.51 | 670.33 ± 28.44 | 694.02 ± 13.89 |
| Aliphatic aldehydes | ||||||
| Hexanal | 772 | 334.75 ± 19.30 | 282.68 ±29.66 | 238.99 ± 16.68 | 192.62 ± 12.05 | 168.51 ± 9.21 |
| Heptanal | 874 | 65.30 ± 5.97 | 60.86 ± 5.17 | 59.41 ± 7.10 | 57.76 ± 2.83 | 53.51 ± 1.33 |
| Nonanal | 1070 | 1293.32 ± 41.87 | 1160.54 ± 51.26 | 1110.54 ± 22.63 | 751.97 ± 26.28 | 261.11 ± 25.45 |
| (E)-2-Nonenal | 1123 | 182.60 ± 6.55 | 165.62 ± 14.40 | 144.96 ± 4.54 | 109.64 ± 1.70 | 83.13 ± 8.40 |
| Decanal | 1174 | 168.31 ± 7.31 | 169.19 ± 9.83 | 160.37 ± 7.78 | 123.58 ± 11.78 | 103.67 ± 17.15 |
| Aromatic aldehyde | ||||||
| Benzaldehyde | 923 | 43.52 ± 4.40 | 31.19 ± 5.32 | 35.52 ± 3.40 | 61.59 ± 2.62 | 73.30 ± 14.76 |
| Ketone | ||||||
| 2-Heptanone | 860 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 16.15 ± 2.93 | 26.15 ± 4.14 | 43.10 ± 3.94 | 45.08 ± 2.52 |
| Lactone | ||||||
| Geranylacetone | 1415 | 99.71 ± 7.82 | 143.71 ± 9.73 | 176.25 ± 12.24 | 181.37 ±7.82 | 198.75 ± 13.62 |
| Furan | ||||||
| 2-Pentylfuran | 970 | 107.49 ± 12.17 | 135.85 ± 8.67 | 139.17 ± 14.58 | 140.95 ± 12.77 | 143.16 ± 13.11 |
| Pyridine | ||||||
| 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline | 886 | 14.36 ± 2.59 | 11.61 ± 1.18 | 11.50 ± 1.09 | 10.17 ± 1.26 | 9.08 ± 0.76 |
| Monoterpenes | ||||||
| α-Pinene | 925 | - c | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 2.96 ± 0.94 | 7.70 ± 1.22 | 13.81 ± 1.08 |
| β-Pinene | 965 | - | 6.38 ± 1.07 | 19.38 ± 5.30 | 59.92 ± 6.17 | 73.22 ± 9.87 |
| Limonene | 1011 | 51.17 ± 4.01 | 74.13 ± 7.38 | 80.23 ± 10.68 | 84.07 ± 7.26 | 91.20 ± 11.56 |
| Sesquiterpene | ||||||
| Longifolene | 1406 | 113.03 ± 9.15 | 109.11 ± 9.45 | 109.41 ± 12.82 | 111.14 ± 10.04 | 102.65 ± 9.09 |
| Total | 5350.84 ± 496.58 | 4973.39 ± 453.64 | 4715.84 ± 490.11 | 4119.33 ± 276.93 | 3396.81 ± 431.77 | |
a Rentention indices, using paraffin (C5–C25) as references; b storage time (month); c undectable.
Analysis of volatile compounds in TN71 with different storage times by HS-SPME.
| Compound | RI a | Peak Areas | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 M b | 1 M | 2 M | 4 M | 6 M | ||
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | ||||||
| Undecane | 1100 | 6.77 ± 1.64 | 6.27 ± 3.59 | 8.57 ± 1.61 | 10.54 ± 0.63 | 9.47 ± 2.37 |
| Dodecane | 1200 | 138.59 ± 9.73 | 133.62 ± 13.23 | 117.60 ± 3.23 | 105.15 ± 5.57 | 90.56 ± 9.82 |
| 1-Tridecene | 1284 | 35.69 ± 4.20 | 35.77 ± 6.22 | 40.77 ± 1.92 | 42.51 ± 1.64 | 42.93 ± 3.65 |
| Tridecane | 1300 | 167.93 ± 13.34 | 150.52 ± 8.29 | 140.52 ± 9.70 | 139.97 ± 6.36 | 125.12 ± 15.07 |
| 3-Methyltridecane | 1368 | 30.07 ± 4.74 | 35.31 ± 6.09 | 40.31 ± 1.61 | 48.32 ± 1.26 | 50.82 ± 2.02 |
| 1-Tetradecene | 1384 | 94.17 ± 9.86 | 73.07 ± 9.02 | 66.07 ± 2.09 | 59.97 ± 3.85 | 54.85 ± 0.46 |
| Tetradecane | 1400 | 173.83 ± 7.19 | 130.69 ± 6.19 | 120.69 ± 14.67 | 117.11 ± 4.38 | 114.25 ± 9.95 |
| 1-Pentadecene | 1483 | 101.81 ± 9.56 | 118.72 ± 2.47 | 128.72 ± 9.80 | 123.97 ± 7.85 | 121.29 ± 7.52 |
| Pentadecane | 1500 | 105.21 ± 10.74 | 95.11 ± 4.73 | 94.11 ± 5.23 | 90.65 ± 8.25 | 88.76 ± 8.43 |
| Hexadecane | 1600 | 86.43 ± 7.95 | 79.29 ± 9.37 | 69.29 ± 9.40 | 68.91 ± 5.78 | 60.39 ± 6.94 |
| Heptadecane | 1700 | 38.86 ± 2.11 | 42.88 ± 1.39 | 44.89 ± 1.16 | 44.53 ± 3.71 | 48.44 ± 2.65 |
| Aliphatic alcohols | ||||||
| 1-Hexanol | 847 | 62.34 ± 13.14 | 60.09 ± 9.76 | 68.09 ± 8.61 | 65.69 ± 4.66 | 67.13 ± 3.81 |
| 1-Hptanol | 942 | - c | - | 3.94 ± 1.03 | 10.72 ± 0.35 | 13.27 ± 1.69 |
| 1-Octanol | 1040 | 177.14 ± 11.97 | 113.75 ± 9.49 | 99.75 ± 7.92 | 85.61 ± 6.43 | 78.57 ± 6.08 |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 953 | 172.93 ± 7.22 | 159.87 ± 8.62 | 116.87 ± 6.48 | 110.33 ± 10.04 | 101.59 ± 9.21 |
| 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 998 | 99.02 ± 4.61 | 183.72 ± 7.87 | 253.72 ± 15.47 | 280.77 ± 11.43 | 323.87 ± 7.65 |
| Aliphatic aldehydes | ||||||
| Hexanal | 772 | 675.27 ± 28.65 | 405.06 ± 14.57 | 370.06 ± 14.52 | 326.72 ± 24.57 | 303.20 ± 7.58 |
| Heptanal | 874 | 75.82 ± 4.47 | 64.86 ± 3.99 | 50.86 ± 2.83 | 46.95 ± 8.13 | 40.83 ± 2.25 |
| Nonanal | 1070 | 3521.70 ± 49.41 | 1952.17 ± 28.75 | 1432.17 ± 42.63 | 1125.25 ± 27.22 | 620.06 ± 16.42 |
| (E)-2-Nonenal | 1123 | 302.59 ± 15.96 | 159.91 ± 5.24 | 103.91 ± 3.00 | 93.31 ± 2.87 | 58.25 ± 5.41 |
| Decanal | 1174 | 175.88 ± 12.56 | 153.41 ± 8.21 | 139.41 ± 5.21 | 119.13 ± 7.14 | 111.26 ± 9.44 |
| Aromatic aldehyde | ||||||
| Benzaldehyde | 923 | 47.17 ± 3.49 | 49.15 ± 1.78 | 50.15 ± 3.55 | 54.87 ± 1.81 | 56.47 ± 1.55 |
| Ketone | ||||||
| 2-Heptanone | 860 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 7.65 ± 0.15 | 11.30 ± 1.35 | 18.54 ± 0.21 | 34.22 ± 2.78 |
| Lactone | ||||||
| Geranylacetone | 1415 | 68.59 ± 7.56 | 73.55 ± 4.07 | 93.55 ± 8.71 | 106.98 ± 3.10 | 121.16 ± 5.08 |
| Furan | ||||||
| 2-Pentylfuran | 970 | 118.72 ± 18.70 | 123.46 ± 6.72 | 136.46 ± 8.32 | 140.25 ± 3.95 | 143.06 ± 4.78 |
| Pyridine | ||||||
| 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline | 886 | 7.52 ± 0.66 | 8.48 ± 0.40 | 10.48 ± 0.31 | 9.10 ± 0.47 | 8.52 ± 0.81 |
| Monoterpenes | ||||||
| α-Pinene | 925 | - | - | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 5.19 ± 0.17 | 4.82 ± 0.11 |
| β-Pinene | 965 | - | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 12.12 ± 1.67 | 20.78 ± 1.71 | 25.03 ± 1.52 |
| Limonene | 1011 | 18.40 ± 2.57 | 49.05 ± 7.69 | 54.05 ± 6.70 | 62.25 ± 4.83 | 85.07 ± 5.40 |
| Sesquiterpene | ||||||
| Longifolene | 1406 | 120.29 ± 10.91 | 47.62 ± 7.88 | 44.62 ± 5.82 | 165.15 ± 9.93 | 56.53 ± 4.83 |
| Total | 6623.03 ± 633.52 | 4513.25 ± 398.91 | 3923.24 ± 315.85 | 3699.22 ± 145.39 | 3059.79 ± 211.27 | |
a Rentention indices, using paraffin (C5–C25) as references; b storage time (month); c undectable.
Analysis of volatile compounds in KH147 with different storage times by HS-SPME.
| Compound | RI a | Peak Areas | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 M b | 1 M | 2 M | 4 M | 6 M | ||
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | ||||||
| Undecane | 1100 | 7.19 ± 1.37 | 29.12 ± 4.76 | 45.26 ± 3.47 | 53.12 ± 4.66 | 80.26 ± 3.10 |
| Dodecane | 1200 | 121.52 ± 6.73 | 94.06 ± 4.44 | 80.81 ± 9.04 | 74.06 ± 1.61 | 70.81 ± 6.09 |
| 1-Tridecene | 1284 | 30.79 ± 1.51 | 64.83 ± 13.26 | 70.59 ± 7.76 | 72.83 ± 7.61 | 74.59 ± 7.11 |
| Tridecane | 1300 | 329.48 ± 15.38 | 319.49 ± 18.45 | 304.39 ± 9.70 | 290.49 ± 8.73 | 248.39 ± 18.55 |
| 3-Methyltridecane | 1368 | 28.27 ± 1.26 | 55.50 ± 6.10 | 90.61 ± 4.00 | 120.50 ± 9.23 | 135.61 ± 7.27 |
| 1-Tetradecene | 1384 | 81.38 ± 2.38 | 66.30 ± 11.69 | 60.77 ± 8.15 | 54.49 ± 4.74 | 50.77 ± 2.02 |
| Tetradecane | 1400 | 315.59 ± 15.66 | 295.89 ± 12.10 | 185.62 ± 8.21 | 179.89 ± 12.55 | 125.62 ± 4.43 |
| 1-Pentadecene | 1483 | 108.68 ± 8.59 | 95.47 ± 1.09 | 87.79 ± 3.91 | 85.47 ± 8.97 | 84.79 ± 3.21 |
| Pentadecane | 1500 | 102.80 ± 8.01 | 109.80 ± 12.28 | 170.76 ± 6.62 | 182.80 ± 5.61 | 207.76 ± 5.50 |
| Hexadecane | 1600 | 116.24 ± 9.38 | 123.99 ± 7.12 | 130.77 ± 8.21 | 136.99 ± 74.26 | 137.77 ± 9.50 |
| Heptadecane | 1700 | 28.38 ± 2.01 | 28.84 ± 2.21 | 33.17 ± 1.82 | 33.89 ± 3.17 | 43.17 ± 0.70 |
| Aliphatic alcohols | ||||||
| 1-Hexanol | 847 | 173.47 ± 14.68 | 180.78 ± 12.48 | 187.61 ± 16.24 | 192.78 ± 15.70 | 192.61 ± 7.66 |
| 1-Hptanol | 942 | - c | 0.20 ± 0.03 | 6.68 ± 0.96 | 28.06 ± 1.30 | 46.68 ± 1.97 |
| 1-Octanol | 1040 | 163.11 ± 10.94 | 155.98 ± 14.82 | 148.98 ± 6.25 | 125.98 ± 6.03 | 115.98 ± 4.53 |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 953 | 105.86 ± 9.39 | 226.89 ± 8.12 | 230.95 ± 8.45 | 246.89 ± 9.26 | 230.95 ± 8.45 |
| 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 998 | 156.85 ± 8.56 | 283.00 ± 15.94 | 570.13 ± 9.81 | 693.00 ± 7.33 | 700.13 ± 11.12 |
| Aliphatic aldehydes | ||||||
| Hexanal | 772 | 427.22 ± 19.25 | 345.03 ± 9.07 | 308.81 ± 15.51 | 225.03 ± 11.22 | 178.81 ± 5.75 |
| Heptanal | 874 | 53.77 ± 3.59 | 62.48 ± 4.11 | 81.08 ± 9.23 | 102.48 ± 8.18 | 121.08 ± 6.14 |
| Nonanal | 1070 | 2218.19 ± 79.14 | 1787.15 ± 75.49 | 1259.99 ± 39.12 | 727.15 ± 51.81 | 375.99 ± 47.95 |
| (E)-2-Nonenal | 1123 | 133.65 ± 8.43 | 93.57 ± 9.98 | 79.02 ± 5.60 | 75.57 ± 4.52 | 57.02 ± 5.37 |
| Decanal | 1174 | 134.01 ± 12.40 | 137.70 ± 10.20 | 140.02 ± 16.86 | 152.70 ± 14.95 | 166.02 ± 5.98 |
| Aromatic aldehyde | ||||||
| Benzaldehyde | 923 | 28.68 ± 1.53 | 40.24 ± 7.21 | 47.61 ± 1.44 | 60.24 ± 4.14 | 70.61 ± 4.79 |
| Ketone | ||||||
| 2-Heptanone | 860 | - | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 7.55 ± 1.15 | 20.10 ± 1.73 | 13.55 ± 0.81 |
| Lactone | ||||||
| Geranylacetone | 1415 | 54.60 ± 8.24 | 70.65 ± 13.99 | 90.18 ± 7.54 | 101.65 ± 11.06 | 108.85 ± 9.54 |
| Furan | ||||||
| 2-Pentylfuran | 970 | 82.13 ± 11.84 | 90.94 ± 7.02 | 98.85 ± 1.88 | 130.94 ± 12.26 | 160.18 ± 7.07 |
| Pyridine | ||||||
| 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline | 886 | 8.46 ± 1.69 | 13.27 ± 1.46 | 11.86 ± 2.11 | 10.27 ± 0.34 | 9.86 ± 1.01 |
| Monoterpenes | ||||||
| α-Pinene | 925 | - | - | 0.20 ± 0.05 | 4.63 ± 0.39 | 3.58 ± 0.60 |
| β-Pinene | 965 | - | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 9.80 ± 9.51 | 42.78 ± 5.35 | 49.80 ± 3.84 |
| Limonene | 1011 | 30.77 ± 1.81 | 46.59 ± 6.37 | 50.91 ± 9.36 | 60.59 ± 9.47 | 107.91 ± 17.54 |
| Sesquiterpene | ||||||
| Longifolene | 1406 | 108.04 ± 8.13 | 109.76 ± 7.00 | 115.44 ± 11.11 | 129.76 ± 18.41 | 138.44 ± 13.18 |
| Total | 5149.13 ± 511.44 | 4927.78 ± 339.22 | 4706.21 ± 221.94 | 4415.13 ± 262.48 | 4107.59 ± 182.06 | |
a Rentention indices, using paraffin (C5–C25) as references; b storage time (month); c undectable.
Analysis of volatile compounds in TC194 with different storage times by HS-SPME.
| Compound | RI a | Peak Areas | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 M b | 1 M | 2 M | 4 M | 6 M | ||
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | ||||||
| Undecane | 1100 | 8.91 ± 1.95 | 9.93 ± 2.87 | 15.93 ± 1.60 | 15.94 ± 1.70 | 16.15 ± 3.42 |
| Dodecane | 1200 | 195.16 ± 4.61 | 186.98 ± 7.29 | 156.98 ± 10.23 | 135.55 ± 2.66 | 126.26 ± 6.24 |
| 1-Tridecene | 1284 | 34.84 ± 2.63 | 51.49 ± 10.02 | 73.54 ± 8.32 | 80.24 ± 2.57 | 81.43 ± 4.04 |
| Tridecane | 1300 | 479.94 ± 18.01 | 320.35 ± 15.21 | 212.35 ± 23.87 | 190.85 ± 17.90 | 188.40 ± 26.72 |
| 3-Methyltridecane | 1368 | 70.04 ± 3.66 | 86.65 ± 13.74 | 96.45 ± 13.34 | 106.59 ± 5.05 | 130.54 ± 7.83 |
| 1-Tetradecene | 1384 | 22.50 ± 4.44 | 68.94 ± 7.59 | 82.94 ± 22.83 | 92.31 ± 9.14 | 112.28 ± 6.68 |
| Tetradecane | 1400 | 194.14 ± 8.93 | 186.99 ± 10.17 | 166.90 ± 18.27 | 143.16 ± 23.90 | 128.79 ± 12.90 |
| 1-Pentadecene | 1483 | 42.07 ± 9.45 | 51.70 ± 9.59 | 61.70 ± 8.09 | 89.94 ± 7.68 | 111.60 ± 16.49 |
| Pentadecane | 1500 | 92.69 ± 7.41 | 118.65 ± 14.90 | 188.65 ± 12.09 | 209.47 ± 19.58 | 230.05 ± 23.63 |
| Hexadecane | 1600 | 88.26 ± 4.03 | 149.73 ± 11.41 | 173.77 ± 11.41 | 208.62 ± 7.48 | 218.31 ± 6.86 |
| Heptadecane | 1700 | 15.34 ± 1.18 | 55.96 ± 9.64 | 74.96 ± 4.15 | 79.23 ± 12.57 | 85.76 ± 3.08 |
| Aliphatic alcohols | ||||||
| 1-Hexanol | 847 | 58.31 ± 2.49 | 68.78 ± 1.32 | 72.64 ± 6.50 | 75.82 ± 3.78 | 80.23 ± 9.12 |
| 1-Hptanol | 942 | - c | - | 4.26 ± 0.71 | 18.37 ± 1.55 | 19.76 ± 3.92 |
| 1-Octanol | 1040 | 138.29 ± 7.27 | 114.16 ± 11.91 | 108.16 ± 6.99 | 84.23 ± 7.97 | 79.00 ± 6.90 |
| 1-Octen-3-ol | 953 | 179.08 ± 11.64 | 166.66 ± 15.15 | 154.66 ± 12.18 | 147.75 ± 8.26 | 126.63 ± 14.42 |
| 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol | 998 | 296.93 ± 14.82 | 432.86 ± 16.93 | 472.86 ± 16.31 | 526.94 ± 20.54 | 566.54 ± 11.33 |
| Aliphatic aldehydes | ||||||
| Hexanal | 772 | 476.69 ± 26.50 | 404.28 ± 13.06 | 276.28 ± 23.52 | 206.54 ± 21.40 | 194.70 ± 9.94 |
| Heptanal | 874 | 78.84 ± 5.24 | 83.79 ± 6.34 | 85.79 ± 8.34 | 90.97 ± 7.82 | 96.06 ± 4.71 |
| Nonanal | 1070 | 2968.41 ± 53.73 | 2445.27 ± 35.44 | 1777.27 ± 32.73 | 1309.70 ± 24.04 | 866.89 ± 23.48 |
| (E)-2-Nonenal | 1123 | 409.08 ± 11.81 | 280.25 ± 9.31 | 201.25 ± 15.73 | 149.94 ± 8.04 | 94.94 ± 5.71 |
| Decanal | 1174 | 171.60 ± 9.90 | 178.80 ± 5.80 | 186.89 ± 12.33 | 193.14 ± 7.00 | 224.87 ± 7.39 |
| Aromatic aldehyde | ||||||
| Benzaldehyde | 923 | 36.48 ± 1.32 | 44.13 ± 2.39 | 49.13 ± 5.49 | 61.48 ± 2.35 | 71.78 ± 2.83 |
| Ketone | ||||||
| 2-Heptanone | 860 | - | 0.23 ± 0.05 | 6.65 ± 0.71 | 10.76 ± 0.70 | 13.42 ± 2.40 |
| Lactone | ||||||
| Geranylacetone | 1415 | 45.35 ± 3.56 | 54.16 ± 4.93 | 59.16 ± 5.03 | 63.88 ± 3.03 | 78.85 ± 5.15 |
| Furan | ||||||
| 2-Pentylfuran | 970 | 90.82 ± 13.96 | 91.74 ± 7.71 | 92.74 ± 6.46 | 97.93 ± 5.04 | 101.00 ± 26.71 |
| Pyridine | ||||||
| 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline | 886 | 11.32 ± 1.79 | 12.62 ± 1.36 | 13.62 ± 0.83 | 12.98 ± 1.62 | 11.79 ± 1.55 |
| Monoterpenes | ||||||
| α-Pinene | 925 | - | - | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 5.10 ± 0.37 | 5.34 ± 0.25 |
| β-Pinene | 965 | - | 4.79 ± 0.65 | 16.23 ± 1.41 | 36.71 ± 1.25 | 40.10 ± 2.17 |
| Limonene | 1011 | 45.66 ± 5.75 | 95.17 ± 7.01 | 96.17 ± 3.72 | 100.47 ± 4.63 | 108.06 ± 13.79 |
| Sesquiterpene | ||||||
| Longifolene | 1406 | 74.41 ± 2.00 | 81.16 ± 4.30 | 93.16 ± 9.34 | 101.85 ± 5.01 | 128.36 ± 11.80 |
| Total | 6325.16 ± 679.85 | 5846.22 ± 302.00 | 5071.27 ± 69.64 | 4646.46 ± 320.29 | 4337.89 ± 224.74 | |
a Rentention indices, using paraffin (C5–C25) as references; b storage time (month); c undectable.
Concentration of functional groups in TK4, TN71, KH147, and TC194 with different storage times.
| Compound | Peak Areas | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TK4 | TN71 | |||||||||
| 0 M a | 1 M | 2 M | 4 M | 6 M | 0 M | 1 M | 2 M | 4 M | 6 M | |
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | 2356.35 | 1680.04 | 1462.95 | 1242.08 | 1019.10 | 979.36 | 901.25 | 871.54 | 851.63 | 806.88 |
| Aliphatic alcohols | 520.78 | 926.17 | 938.05 | 941.70 | 957.53 | 511.43 | 517.43 | 542.37 | 553.12 | 584.43 |
| Aliphatic aldehydes | 2044.28 | 1838.89 | 1714.27 | 1235.57 | 669.93 | 4751.26 | 2735.41 | 2096.41 | 1711.36 | 1133.60 |
| Aromatic aldehyde | 43.52 | 31.19 | 35.52 | 61.59 | 73.30 | 47.17 | 49.15 | 50.15 | 54.87 | 56.47 |
| Ketone | 0.15 | 16.15 | 26.15 | 43.10 | 45.08 | 0.29 | 7.65 | 11.30 | 18.54 | 34.22 |
| Lactone | 99.71 | 143.71 | 176.25 | 181.37 | 198.75 | 68.59 | 73.55 | 93.55 | 106.98 | 121.16 |
| Furan | 107.49 | 135.85 | 139.17 | 140.95 | 143.16 | 118.72 | 123.46 | 136.46 | 140.25 | 143.06 |
| Pyridine | 14.36 | 11.61 | 11.50 | 10.17 | 9.08 | 7.52 | 8.48 | 10.48 | 9.10 | 8.52 |
| Monoterpenes | 51.17 | 80.67 | 102.57 | 151.69 | 178.23 | 18.40 | 49.25 | 66.36 | 88.22 | 114.92 |
| Sesquiterpene | 113.03 | 109.11 | 109.41 | 111.14 | 102.65 | 120.29 | 47.62 | 44.62 | 165.15 | 56.53 |
| Total | 5350.84 | 4973.39 | 4715.84 | 4119.33 | 3396.81 | 6623.03 | 4513.25 | 3923.24 | 3699.22 | 3059.79 |
| Compound | KH147 | TC194 | ||||||||
| Aliphatic hydrocarbons | 1270.32 | 1283.29 | 1260.54 | 1284.53 | 1259.54 | 1243.89 | 1287.37 | 1304.17 | 1351.90 | 1429.57 |
| Aliphatic alcohols | 599.29 | 846.85 | 1144.35 | 1286.71 | 1324.35 | 672.61 | 782.46 | 812.58 | 853.11 | 872.16 |
| Aliphatic aldehydes | 2966.84 | 2425.93 | 1868.92 | 1282.93 | 898.92 | 4104.62 | 3392.39 | 2518.48 | 1950.29 | 1477.46 |
| Aromatic aldehyde | 28.68 | 40.24 | 47.61 | 60.24 | 70.61 | 36.48 | 44.13 | 49.13 | 61.48 | 71.78 |
| Ketone | - b | 0.14 | 7.55 | 20.10 | 13.55 | - | 0.23 | 6.65 | 10.76 | 13.42 |
| Lactone | 54.60 | 70.65 | 90.18 | 101.65 | 108.85 | 45.35 | 54.16 | 59.16 | 63.88 | 78.85 |
| Furan | 82.13 | 90.94 | 98.85 | 130.94 | 160.18 | 90.82 | 91.74 | 92.74 | 97.93 | 101.00 |
| Pyridine | 8.46 | 13.27 | 11.86 | 10.27 | 9.86 | 11.32 | 12.62 | 13.62 | 12.98 | 11.79 |
| Monoterpenes | 30.77 | 46.71 | 60.91 | 108.00 | 161.29 | 45.66 | 99.96 | 112.58 | 142.28 | 153.50 |
| Sesquiterpene | 108.04 | 109.76 | 115.44 | 129.76 | 138.44 | 74.41 | 81.16 | 93.16 | 101.85 | 128.36 |
| Total | 5149.13 | 4927.78 | 4706.21 | 4415.13 | 4107.59 | 6325.16 | 5846.22 | 5071.27 | 4646.46 | 4337.89 |
a Storage time (month); b undectable.
References
1. Kovach, M.J.; Calingacion, M.N.; Fitzgerald, M.A.; McCouch, S.R. The origin and evolution of fragrance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA; 2009; 106, pp. 14444-14449. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0904077106] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19706531]
2. Lee, S.Y.; Ahn, J.H.; Cha, Y.S.; Yun, D.W.; Lee, M.C.; Ko, J.C.; Lee, K.S.; Eun, M.Y. Mapping QTLs related to salinity toler-ance of rice at the young seedling stage. Plant Breeding; 2007; 126, pp. 43-46. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01265.x]
3. Zhao, Q.; Xue, Y.; Shen, Q. Changes in the major aroma-active compounds and taste components of T Jasmine rice during storage. Food Res. Int.; 2020; 133, 109160. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109160] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32466949]
4. Chen, H.H.; Chiu, T.H. Phytochemicals Characterization of Solvent Extracts from Taro-Scented Japonica Rice Bran. J. Food Sci.; 2011; 76, pp. C656-C662. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02143.x]
5. Lu, L.; Hu, Z.Q.; Fang, C.G.; Hu, X.Q. Characteristic Flavor Compounds and Functional Components of Fragrant Rice with Different Flavor Types. Foods; 2023; 12, 2185. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods12112185]
6. Buttery, R.G.; Ling, L.C.; Juliano, B.O. 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline: An important aroma component of cooked rice. Chem. Ind.; 1982; 23, pp. 958-959.
7. Buttery, R.G.; Ling, L.C.; Juliano, B.O.; Turnbaugh, J.G. Cooked Rice Aroma and 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 1983; 31, pp. 823-826. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf00118a036]
8. Yoshihashi, T. Quantitative Analysis on 2-Acetyl-1-pyrroline of an Aromatic Rice by Stable Isotope Dilution Method and Model Studies on its Formation during Cooking. J. Food Sci.; 2002; 67, pp. 619-622. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb10648.x]
9. Hu, X.; Lu, L.; Guo, Z.; Zhu, Z. Volatile compounds, affecting factors and evaluation methods for rice aroma: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol.; 2020; 97, pp. 136-146. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.01.003]
10. Tananuwong, K.; Lertsiri, S. Changes in volatile aroma compounds of organic fragrant rice during storage under different conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric.; 2010; 90, pp. 1590-1596. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.3976]
11. Widjaja, R.; Craske, J.D.; Wootton, M. Changes in volatile components of paddy, brown and white fragrant rice during storage. J. Sci. Food Agric.; 1996; 71, pp. 218-224. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199606)71:2<218::AID-JSFA570>3.0.CO;2-5]
12. Gao, C.; Li, Y.; Pan, Q.; Fan, M.; Wang, L.; Qian, H. Analysis of the key aroma volatile compounds in rice bran during storage and processing via HS-SPME GC/MS. J. Cereal Sci.; 2021; 99, 103178. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2021.103178]
13. Dias, L.G.; Duarte, G.H.B.; Mariutti, L.R.B.; Bragagnolo, N. Aroma profile of rice varieties by a novel SPME method able to maximize 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline and minimize hexanal extraction. Food Res. Int.; 2019; 123, pp. 550-558. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2019.05.025]
14. Choi, S.; Seo, H.S.; Lee, K.R.; Lee, S.; Lee, J.; Lee, J. Effect of milling and long-term storage on volatiles of black rice (Oryza sativa L.) determined by headspace solid-phase microextraction with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Food Chem.; 2019; 276, pp. 572-582. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.10.052]
15. Van Den Dool, H.; Kratz, P.D. A Generalization of the Retention Index System Including Linear Temperature Programmed Gas-Liquid Partition Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A; 1963; 11, pp. 463-471. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(01)80947-X]
16. Peng, J.; Yang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Hocart, C.H.; Zhao, H.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, F. Headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry with selected ion monitoring for the determination of four food flavoring compounds and its application in identifying artificially scented rice. Food Chem.; 2020; 313, 126136. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126136] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31927209]
17. Bryant, R.J.; McClung, A.M. Volatile profiles of aromatic and non-aromatic rice cultivars using SPME/GC-MS. Food Chem.; 2011; 124, pp. 501-513. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.06.061]
18. Wei, X.; Handoko, D.D.; Pather, L.; Methven, L.; Elmore, J.S. Evaluation of 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline in foods, with an emphasis on rice flavor. Food Chem.; 2017; 232, pp. 531-544. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.005]
19. Lim, D.K.; Mo, C.; Lee, D.K.; Long, N.P.; Lim, J.; Kwon, S.W. Non-destructive profiling of volatile organic compounds using HS-SPME/GC-MS and its application for the geographical discrimination of white rice. J. Food Drug Anal.; 2018; 26, pp. 260-267. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2017.04.005]
20. Lord, H.; Pawliszyn, J. Evolution of solid-phase microextraction technology. J. Chromatogr. A; 2000; 885, pp. 153-193. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00535-5]
21. Choi, S.; Seo, H.S.; Lee, K.R.; Lee, S.; Lee, J. Effect of milling degrees on volatile profiles of raw and cooked black rice (Oryza sativa L. cv. Sintoheugmi). Appl. Biol. Chem.; 2018; 61, pp. 91-105. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13765-017-0339-z]
22. Champagne, E.T. Rice aroma and flavor: A literature review. Cereal Chem.; 2008; 85, pp. 445-454. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-85-4-0445]
23. Routray, W.; Rayaguru, K. 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline: A key aroma component of aromatic rice and other food products. Food Rev. Int.; 2018; 34, pp. 539-565. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2017.1347672]
24. Junxing, L.; Aiqing, M.; Gangjun, Z.; Xiaoxi, L.; Haibin, W.; Jianning, L.; Hao, G.; Xiaoming, Z.; Liting, D.; Chengying, M. Assessment of the ‘taro-like’ aroma of pumpkin fruit (Cucurbita moschata D.) via E-nose, GC–MS and GC-O analysis. Food Chem. X; 2022; 15, 100435. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100435]
25. Liu, T.T.; Yang, T.S. Effects of an industrial milling process on change of headspace volatiles in Yihchuan aromatic rice. Cereal Chem.; 2011; 88, pp. 137-141. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-07-10-0101]
26. Pichersky, E.; Noel, J.P.; Dudareva, N. Biosynthesis of plant volatiles: Nature’s diversity and ingenuity. Science; 2006; 311, pp. 808-811. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1118510] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16469917]
27. Minju, K.; Kandhasamy, S.; Hae-Jin, C.; Se-Jin, P.; Songmun, K. Olfactory Stimulation Effect of Aldehydes, Nonanal, and Decanal on the Human Electroencephalographic Activity, According to Nostril Variation. Biomedicines; 2019; 7, 57.
28. Dionísio, A.P.; Molina, G.; Souza de Carvalho, D.; dos Santos, R.; Bicas, J.L.; Pastore, G.M. 11—Natural flavourings from biotechnology for foods and beverages. Natural Food Additives, Ingredients and Flavourings; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2012; pp. 231-259.
29. Lee, J.; Xiao, L.; Zhang, G.; Ebeler, S.E.; Mitchell, A.E. Influence of Storage on Volatile Profiles in Roasted Almonds (Prunus dulcis). J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2014; 62, pp. 11236-11245. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf503817g]
30. Zeng, Z.; Zhang, H.; Chen, J.Y.; Zhang, T.; Matsunaga, R. Direct extraction of volatiles of rice during cooking using solid-phase microextraction. Cereal Chem.; 2007; 84, pp. 423-427. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1094/CCHEM-84-5-0423]
31. Bonikowski, R.; Świtakowska, P.; Kula, J. Synthesis, odour evaluation and antimicrobial activity of some geranyl acetone and nerolidol analogues. Flavour Fragr. J.; 2015; 30, pp. 238-244. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ffj.3238]
32. Kunst, L.; Samuels, A.L. Biosynthesis and secretion of plant cuticular wax. Prog. Lipid Res.; 2003; 42, pp. 51-80. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0163-7827(02)00045-0] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12467640]
33. Yang, D.S.; Lee, K.S.; Jeong, O.Y.; Kim, K.J.; Kays, S.J. Characterization of volatile aroma compounds in cooked black rice. J. Agric. Food Chem.; 2008; 56, pp. 235-240. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1021/jf072360c] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18081248]
34. Bao, H.; Kondo, A.; Kaga, A.; Tada, M.; Sakaguti, K.; Inoue, Y.; Shimoda, Y.; Narumi, D.; Machimura, T. Biogenic volatile organic compound emission potential of forests and paddy fields in the Kinki region of Japan. Environ. Res.; 2008; 106, pp. 156-169. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2007.09.009] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18023428]
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Details
; Chin-Sheng, Wu 3 ; Lee-Ping, Chu 4
; Wei-Miao, Jiang 5 ; Hsin-Chun, Chen 5
1 Hualien District Agricultural Research and Extension Station, Ministry of Agriculture, Hualien 973, Taiwan;
2 Department of Food Science, National Quemoy University, Kinmen 892, Taiwan;
3 Department of Pharmacy, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan;
4 Department of Orthopedics, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 404, Taiwan;
5 Department of Cosmeceutics, China Medical University, Taichung 406, Taiwan