It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Inflationary spacetimes have been argued to be past geodesically incomplete in many situations. However, whether the geodesic incompleteness implies the existence of an initial spacetime curvature singularity or whether the spacetime may be extended (potentially into another phase of the universe) is generally unknown. Both questions have important physical implications. In this paper, we take a closer look at the geometrical structure of inflationary spacetimes and investigate these very questions. We first classify which past inflationary histories have a scalar curvature singularity and which might be extendible and/or non-singular in homogeneous and isotropic cosmology with flat spatial sections. Then, we derive rigorous extendibility criteria of various regularity classes for quasi-de Sitter spacetimes that evolve from infinite proper time in the past. Finally, we show that beyond homogeneity and isotropy, special continuous extensions respecting the Einstein field equations with a perfect fluid must have the equation of state of a de Sitter universe asymptotically. An interpretation of our results is that past-eternal inflationary scenarios are most likely physically singular, except in situations with very special initial conditions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Canada (GRID:grid.420198.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 8658 0851); University of Waterloo, Department of Applied Mathematics and Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics, Waterloo, Canada (GRID:grid.46078.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 8644 1405)
2 University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Centre for Geometry and Topology (GeoTop), Department of Mathematical Sciences, Copenhagen, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X); University of Toronto, Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)
3 Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Canada (GRID:grid.420198.6) (ISNI:0000 0000 8658 0851); University of Waterloo, Department of Applied Mathematics and Waterloo Centre for Astrophysics, Waterloo, Canada (GRID:grid.46078.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 8644 1405); University of Toronto, Fields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences, Toronto, Canada (GRID:grid.17063.33) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 2938)