It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Several vaccine programs were introduced during the COVID-19 pandemic, which included inactivated virus, DNA viral vectors and mRNA vaccines. Booster programs are recommended, especially for those in high-risk groups. However, many of these booster programs involve heterologous vaccines. This study enrolled volunteers who first received two full-dose CoronaVac vaccinations before receiving heterologous boosters with DNA- and/or mRNA-vaccines for an additional 2 doses (n = 40) or an additional 3 doses (n = 16). Our results showed no difference in side effects, neutralizing antibodies, or T-cell responses for any of the heterologous vaccination programs. However, the neutralizing capacity and IFN-γ responses against the Omicron variant in volunteers who received 4 or 5 doses were improved. Polarization of peripheral memory T cells after stimulation in all booster groups with Omicron peptide showed an increased trend of naïve and central memory phenotypes of both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, suggesting that exposure to Omicron antigens will drive T cells into a lymphoid resident T cell phenotype. Our data support a continuous vaccination program to maximize the effectiveness of immunity, especially in people at high risk. Furthermore, the number of boosting doses is important for maintaining immunity.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Khon Kaen University, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen, Thailand (GRID:grid.9786.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 0856); Khon Kaen University, Research and Diagnostic Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases (RCEID), Khon Kaen, Thailand (GRID:grid.9786.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 0856)
2 Khon Kaen University, Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen, Thailand (GRID:grid.9786.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 0856)
3 Khon Kaen University, Infectious Disease Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen, Thailand (GRID:grid.9786.0) (ISNI:0000 0004 0470 0856)
4 University of Liverpool, Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, Liverpool, UK (GRID:grid.10025.36) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8470)