It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Coastal upwelling regions are among the most productive marine ecosystems but may be threatened by amplified ocean acidification. Increased acidification is hypothesized to reduce iron bioavailability for phytoplankton thereby expanding iron limitation and impacting primary production. Here we show from community to molecular levels that phytoplankton in an upwelling region respond to short-term acidification exposure with iron uptake pathways and strategies that reduce cellular iron demand. A combined physiological and multi-omics approach was applied to trace metal clean incubations that introduced 1200 ppm CO2 for up to four days. Although variable, molecular-level responses indicate a prioritization of iron uptake pathways that are less hindered by acidification and reductions in iron utilization. Growth, nutrient uptake, and community compositions remained largely unaffected suggesting that these mechanisms may confer short-term resistance to acidification; however, we speculate that cellular iron demand is only temporarily satisfied, and longer-term acidification exposure without increased iron inputs may result in increased iron stress.
Coastal upwelling regions are among the most productive marine ecosystems but may be threatened by amplified ocean acidification. Here the authors show from community to molecular levels that phytoplankton in an upwelling region respond to short-term acidification exposure with iron uptake pathways and strategies that reduce cellular iron demand.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details







1 University of California San Diego, Integrative Oceanography Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242); J. Craig Venter Institute, Microbial and Environmental Genomics, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.469946.0)
2 University of California San Diego, Geosciences Research Division, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.266100.3) (ISNI:0000 0001 2107 4242)
3 Dalhousie University, Department of Biology and Institute for Comparative Genomics, Halifax, Canada (GRID:grid.55602.34) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8200)
4 Czech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre, Institute of Parasitology, České Budějovice, Czechia (GRID:grid.418095.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1015 3316); University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czechia (GRID:grid.14509.39) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 4904)
5 J. Craig Venter Institute, Microbial and Environmental Genomics, La Jolla, USA (GRID:grid.469946.0)