It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Highlights
This review systematically analyzes the effect of the electrolyte-to-sulfur ratios on battery energy density and the challenges for sulfur reduction reactions under lean electrolyte conditions.
The strengths and limitations of different transition metal compounds are systematically presented and discussed from a fundamental perspective.
Three promising strategies for sulfur hosts that act as anchors and catalysts are proposed to boost lean electrolyte Li–S battery performance.
Lithium–sulfur (Li–S) batteries have received widespread attention, and lean electrolyte Li–S batteries have attracted additional interest because of their higher energy densities. This review systematically analyzes the effect of the electrolyte-to-sulfur (E/S) ratios on battery energy density and the challenges for sulfur reduction reactions (SRR) under lean electrolyte conditions. Accordingly, we review the use of various polar transition metal sulfur hosts as corresponding solutions to facilitate SRR kinetics at low E/S ratios (< 10 µL mg−1), and the strengths and limitations of different transition metal compounds are presented and discussed from a fundamental perspective. Subsequently, three promising strategies for sulfur hosts that act as anchors and catalysts are proposed to boost lean electrolyte Li–S battery performance. Finally, an outlook is provided to guide future research on high energy density Li–S batteries.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 KU Leuven, Laboratory for Soft Matter and Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
2 Fujian Normal University, Fujian Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials, College of Chemistry and Materials Science, Fuzhou, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.411503.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 9271 2478)
3 KU Leuven, Department of Materials Engineering, Faculty of Science Engineering, Leuven, Belgium (GRID:grid.5596.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0668 7884)
4 Sichuan University, Lab of Electrolytes and Phase Change Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China (GRID:grid.13291.38) (ISNI:0000 0001 0807 1581)
5 Catalonia Institute for Energy Research (IREC), Advanced Materials Department, Barcelona, Spain (GRID:grid.424742.3) (ISNI:0000 0004 1768 5181)