It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Hydropower plants are among the most efficient and reliable renewable energy systems in the world as far as electricity production is concerned. Run-of-river hydropower plants seem more attractive than conventional hydroelectric plants since they can be a cheaper and environmentally friendly alternative. However, their expected energy production pattern heavily depends on several construction variables that need an appropriate design using specific models. This paper analyzes several existing models used for the calculation of the diameter and thickness of a penstock, the optimal selection and implantation (admissible suction head) of a turbine, to estimate the energy produced and expected cost of small hydropower projects for grid-connected and off-grid/micro-grid applications. This review particularly brings out the specificities of each of the models to suggest the most appropriate model according to the context of study and proposes methods to use them more efficiently. This review can be used as a guide in the design and simulation of run-of-river hydropower plants, thus helping in the assessment of the economic feasibility of projects that usually requires a high level of experience and expertise.
Highlights
A critical review focused particularly on run-of-river hydropower plant design models was carried out.
Several calculation models including diameter and thickness of a penstock, admissible suction head of a turbine, and cost and energy production estimation for grid-connected applications are collected and analyzed.
Hydropower models for design and generation profile prediction presented can be used to optimally come against the variability problem of run-of river plants.
The paper can be used as a guide in the design and simulation of run-of-river hydropower plants with appropriate models.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details

1 National Center for Development of Technologies-Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon (GRID:grid.500526.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0595 6917)
2 National Center for Development of Technologies-Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon (GRID:grid.500526.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0595 6917); National Advanced School of Engineering/ L3E, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon (GRID:grid.412661.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 8504)
3 Institute of Geological and Mining Research- Hydrological Research Centre (IRGM-CRH)-Ministry of Scientific Research and Innovation, Yaoundé, Cameroon (GRID:grid.473396.c) (ISNI:0000 0004 7590 1516)
4 University of Pisa, Department of Energy, Systems, Territory and Construction Engineering, Pisa, Italy (GRID:grid.5395.a) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 3729)
5 National Advanced School of Engineering/ L3E, University of Yaoundé I, Yaoundé, Cameroon (GRID:grid.412661.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 2173 8504)