It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Stroke survivors frequently report increased perceived challenge of walking (PCW) in complex environments, restricting their daily ambulation. PCW is conventionally measured through subjective questionnaires or, more recently, through objective quantification of sympathetic nervous system activity during walking tasks. However, how these measurements of PCW reflect daily walking activity post-stroke is unknown. We aimed to compare the subjective and objective assessments of PCW in predicting home and community ambulation. In 29 participants post-stroke, we measured PCW subjectively with the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale and objectively through electrodermal activity, quantified by change in skin conductance levels (SCL) and skin conductance responses (SCR) between outdoor-complex and indoor-steady-state walking. High-PCW participants were categorized into high-change SCL (ΔSCL ≥ 1.7 μs), high-change SCR (ΔSCR ≥ 0.2 μs) and low ABC (ABC < 72%) groups, while low-PCW participants were categorized into low-change SCL (ΔSCL < 1.7 μs), low-change SCR (ΔSCR < 0.2 μs) and high-ABC (ABC ≥ 72%) groups. Number and location of daily steps were quantified with accelerometry and Global Positioning System devices. Compared to low-change SCL group, the high-change SCL group took fewer steps in home and community (p = 0.04). Neither ABC nor SCR groups differed in home or community steps/day. Objective measurement of PCW via electrodermal sensing more accurately represents home and community ambulation compared to the subjective questionnaire.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 University of Mount Union, Department of Physical Therapy, Alliance, USA (GRID:grid.421907.9) (ISNI:0000 0000 8936 4302)
2 University of Florida, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); Malcolm Randall Veterans Affair Medical Center, Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37)
3 University of Florida, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, USA (GRID:grid.476954.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0438 8575)
4 University of Florida, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 8091); Malcolm Randall Veterans Affair Medical Center, Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Gainesville, USA (GRID:grid.15276.37); Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, USA (GRID:grid.476954.d) (ISNI:0000 0004 0438 8575)




