Abstract

In patients with heart failure, guideline directed medical therapy improves outcomes and requires close patient monitoring. Pulmonary artery pressure monitors permit remote assessment of cardiopulmonary haemodynamics and facilitate early intervention that has been shown to decrease heart failure hospitalization. Pressure sensors implanted in the pulmonary vasculature are stabilized through passive or active interaction with the anatomy and communicate with an external reader to relay invasively measured pressure by radiofrequency. A body mass index  > 35 kg/m2 and chest circumference > 165 cm prevent use due to poor communication. Pulmonary vasculature anatomy is variable between patients and the pulmonary artery size, angulation of vessels and depth of sensor location from the chest wall in heart failure patients who may be candidates for pressure sensors remains largely unexamined. The present study analyses the size, angulation, and depth of the pulmonary artery at the position of implantation of two pulmonary artery pressure sensors: the CardioMEMS sensor typically implanted in the left pulmonary artery and the Cordella sensor implanted in the right pulmonary artery. Thirty-four computed tomography pulmonary angiograms from patients with heart failure were analysed using the MIMICS software. Distance from the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery to the implant site was shorter for the right pulmonary artery (4.55 ± 0.64 cm vs. 7.4 ± 1.3 cm) and vessel diameter at the implant site was larger (17.15 ± 2.87 mm vs. 11.83 ± 2.30 mm). Link distance (length of the communication path between sensor and reader) was shorter for the left pulmonary artery (9.40 ± 1.43 mm vs. 12.54 ± 1.37 mm). Therefore, the detailed analysis of pulmonary arterial anatomy using computed tomography pulmonary angiograms may alter the choice of implant location to reduce the risk of sensor migration and improve readability by minimizing sensor-to-reader link distance.

Details

Title
Anatomical characterization of pulmonary artery and implications to pulmonary artery pressure monitor implantation
Author
Zafar, Hamza 1 ; Neelam-Naganathan, Dharshan 1 ; Middleton, Jennifer T. 1 ; Binmahfooz, Sarah K. 2 ; Battersby, Christian 2 ; Rogers, Dominic 3 ; Swift, Andrew J. 1 ; Rothman, Alexander M. K. 1 

 University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262); Sheffield University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262); School of Medicine and Population Health, Division of Clinical Medicine, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) 
 University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262); School of Medicine and Population Health, Division of Clinical Medicine, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) 
 Sheffield University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK (GRID:grid.11835.3e) (ISNI:0000 0004 1936 9262) 
Pages
20528
Publication year
2023
Publication date
2023
Publisher
Nature Publishing Group
e-ISSN
20452322
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2892422781
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.