It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Mandacaru is a cactus with great socioeconomic potential, but lack of information about its cultivation hinders its domestication. Here, we aimed to evaluate the acclimatization and vegetative development of mandacaru under different substrates and irrigation levels. For this, seeds inoculated in vitro were grown for 120 days, being transplanted to pots containing four types of substrate (S1—caatinga soil + gravel; S2—washed sand + organic matter + soil + charcoal; S3—washed sand + cattle manure + soil + sand; S4—commercial organic substrate). Pots were irrigated with 100% of the field capacity (FC) once-a-week, or with 50% FC twice-a-week, and kept in a greenhouse for six months. The experimental design was completely randomized, in a 4 × 2 factorial scheme, with six replications. Plant height and diameter, axial and radial growth rate, fresh and dry mass of stem and root, water content, and photosynthetic pigments were determined. Growth was affected mainly by the substrate, with S4 resulting in higher growth and pigment content, while S1 was impaired and S2 and S3 resulted in intermediate growth. The use of S4 and 100% FC once per week was the best condition for mandacaru.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Federal University of Paraíba, Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences (Agroecology), Bananeiras, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145); National Institute of the Semiarid, Campina Grande, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1)
2 Federal University of Paraíba, Graduate Program in Agronomy, Areia, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145)
3 National Institute of the Semiarid, Campina Grande, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1)
4 Federal University of Paraíba, Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences (Agroecology), Bananeiras, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145); National Institute of the Semiarid, Campina Grande, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1); Federal University of Paraíba, Department of Agriculture, Bananeiras, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145)
5 Federal University of Paraíba, Graduate Program in Agricultural Sciences (Agroecology), Bananeiras, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145); Federal University of Paraíba, Graduate Program in Agronomy, Areia, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145); Federal University of Paraíba, Department of Agriculture, Bananeiras, Brazil (GRID:grid.411216.1) (ISNI:0000 0004 0397 5145)