It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Multi-use of offshore wind farms with low-trophic aquaculture could provide sustainable energy, nutritious seafood, and restorative ecosystem services through nutrients and carbon capture and utilization. In a transition zone between marine and brackish seas, our model predicted that allocating 10% of projected wind farm areas to blue mussel and sugar kelp aquaculture in the North Sea - Baltic Sea transition zone could yield 18 t-fresh weight ha−1 yr−1. Total carbon captured and harvested from seaweed biomass and mussel shells would equal 40% of the carbon dioxide emissions from the Danish agricultural sector. Furthermore, global aquaculture production is projected to increase by 132% compared to current production. With technological and regulatory challenges still to be addressed, these findings demonstrate a vast potential of multi-use in offshore areas, which can generate blue biomass with fewer user conflicts, while mitigating eutrophication and climate change, thereby supporting multiple global sustainable development goals.
Combining mussel and macroalgae farming with offshore wind farms can provide emission capture and utilization of carbon and macro-nutrients for food, feed, and materials, suggest up-scaled model simulations from the North and Baltic Seas.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details





1 Aarhus University, Department of Ecoscience, Roskilde, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)
2 Aarhus University, Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722); Aarhus University, Centre for Circular Bioeconomy (CBIO), Aarhus, Denmark (GRID:grid.7048.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 1956 2722)
3 University of Copenhagen, Department of Food Science, Frederiksberg, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X); University of Copenhagen, Green Solution Center (GSC), Frederiksberg, Denmark (GRID:grid.5254.6) (ISNI:0000 0001 0674 042X)
4 Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research (AWI), Marine Aquaculture, Shelf Sea Systems Ecology, Biosciences, Bremerhaven, Germany (GRID:grid.10894.34) (ISNI:0000 0001 1033 7684); University of Applied Sciences Bremerhaven, Applied Marine Biology & Aquaculture, Bremerhaven, Germany (GRID:grid.461640.1) (ISNI:0000 0001 1087 6522)
5 University of Tartu, Estonian Marine Institute, Tallinn, Estonia (GRID:grid.10939.32) (ISNI:0000 0001 0943 7661)