It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
On March 5, 2022, a 12 kg meteoroid crossed the sky above Central Italy and was observed by three different observational systems: the PRISMA all-sky camera network (10 stations), the Italian national seismic network (61 stations), and a 4-element infrasound array. The corresponding datasets, each with its own resolution, provided three independent assessments of the trajectory, size and speed of the meteoroid. The bolide traveled across central Italy with an azimuth of 102 degrees, becoming visible at about 91 km above sea level with a velocity of about 15.4 km/s. Its visible trajectory lasted about 15 s. Reasonably, the residual portion of the ablated bolide terminated its path in the Adriatic Sea and could not be recovered. Seismic and infrasound data well match optical observations detecting the bolide Mach cone at 68 km above sea level with a back azimuth of 25 degrees with respect to the array. By comparing results from the three different systems, discrepancies are within the estimated uncertainties, thus confirming the mutual consistency of the adopted methodologies. Therefore, this study shows that different approaches can be integrated to improve the detection capability for bolide crossing the sky in monitored regions.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sezione di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2300 5064); INAF/IAPS, Rome, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a)
2 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sezione di Pisa, Pisa, Italy (GRID:grid.470216.6)
3 Università di Torino, Dipartimento di Fisica, Torino, Italy (GRID:grid.7605.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 2336 6580); INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Pino Torinese (TO), Italy (GRID:grid.436940.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7237)
4 INAF – Osservatorio Astrofisico di Torino, Pino Torinese (TO), Italy (GRID:grid.436940.c) (ISNI:0000 0001 2157 7237)
5 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sede di Napoli, Napoli, Italy (GRID:grid.410348.a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2300 5064)
6 University of Florence, Department of Earth Sciences, Florence, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 1757 2304)
7 CNR-IBE – Institute of Bioeconomy – National Research Council, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8); LaMMA Consortium, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8)
8 CNR-IBE – Institute of Bioeconomy – National Research Council, Sesto Fiorentino, Italy (GRID:grid.8404.8)