Introduction
Light energy is essential for photosynthesis, which sustains our environment on Earth by generating oxygen and chemical energy for carbon fixation. The first step of photosynthetic electron transfer in the thylakoid membrane occurs at Photosystem II (PSII), where light energy is transferred to P680 chlorophyll molecules to drive water oxidation, and electron is transferred to plastoquinone. PSII core complex is formed by two reaction center proteins D1 (PsbA) and D2 (PsbD), along with core antenna CP43 (PsbC) and CP47 (PsbB). However, light energy is known to cause photooxidative damage in PSII, especially reaction center protein D1. Photo-damaged D1 needs to be degraded to replace it with a newly synthesized one in the PSII repair (Lindahl et al., 2000; Bailey et al., 2002; Silva et al., 2003; Kato et al., 2009). When photooxidative damage in PSII exceeds the capacity of PSII repair, it ultimately leads to the status called ‘photoinhibition’ (Aro et al., 1993; Murata et al., 2007). PSII repair proceeds with the following steps, (i) oxidative damage to D1 protein in the PSII complex, (ii) migration of photo-damaged PSII laterally from grana stacks to non-appressed regions of thylakoid membranes, (iii) detachment of CP43 from photo-damaged PSII allows for access of protease degrading damaged D1, and (iv) concomitant D1 synthesis and reassembly of PSII into grana thylakoid. Substantial efforts to understand the mechanisms of PSII repair suggest that reversible phosphorylation of PSII core subunits is involved in fine-tuning the photo-damaged D1 turnover (Barber et al., 2002; Fristedt et al., 2009; Kato and Sakamoto, 2014).
Our previous studies along with those from other groups have shown that the fundamental D1 degradation in PSII repair is performed by FtsH, a membrane-bound ATP-dependent zinc metalloprotease that degrades membrane proteins in a processive manner, although several Deg proteases seem to facilitate the effective degradation by creating additional recognition sites for FtsH (Lindahl et al., 2000; Bailey et al., 2002; Sakamoto et al., 2003; Silva et al., 2003; Kato et al., 2009; Kato and Sakamoto, 2014). These proteins are universally conserved in prokaryotes and eukaryotic organelles (Janska and Malgorzata Kwasniaka, 2013). Photosynthetic organisms have hetero-hexameric FtsH complex in the thylakoid membrane, which is composed of type A and type B subunits (Kato and Sakamoto, 2018; Yi et al., 2022). In the thylakoid membrane of
In
What is the disorder of photosystems leading to photo-oxidative damage in PSII? Light energy frequently leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as singlet oxygen at around PSII (Ohnishi et al., 2005; Tyystjarvi, 2008; Yamamoto et al., 2008), which may cause oxidative post-translational modification (OPTM) of subunit proteins (Li and Kim, 2022). It is noteworthy that light-dependent oxidation of amino acids, either in free forms or as peptide residues, has been reported, including thiol-containing (Cys and Met) and aromatic (Tyr, Phe, Trp) amino acids. For example, Cys and Met are prone to oxidation, whereas the oxidized Cys and Met can be reduced enzymatically. In contrast to these reversible OPTMs, OPTM of Trp is irreversible (Rinalducci et al., 2008; Ehrenshaft et al., 2015). Thus, the only way to remove irreversible oxidized residues is proteolytic degradation, implying that Trp oxidation might trigger D1 degradation, either directly or indirectly in the PSII repair. As summarized in Figure 1A, oxidation of Trp side chain results in the formation of oxindolylalanine (OIA), N-formylkynurenine (NFK), and kynurenine (KYN). ROS attacks and opens the pyrrole ring of Trp, and forms a di-oxidized Trp derivative, NFK. Indeed, Trp residues in photosynthetic protein components were shown to be oxidized both in vitro and in vivo (Anderson et al., 2002; Dreaden et al., 2011; Dreaden Kasson et al., 2012). However, although oxidative modification of D1 and other subunits has been documented previously, how these molecules are recognized and undergo degradation remains elusive. In this study, we investigated whether Trp oxidation in PSII core proteins influences D1 degradation mediated by FtsH. Our integrative approaches to address this question, by mass-spectrometry, site-directed mutagenesis, D1 degradation assay, and simulation model suggest that an N-terminal Trp oxidation is likely to be a key OPTM to trigger D1 degradation in the PSII repair.
Figure 1.
The Oxidized Trp residues in PSII complex.
(A) Trp-oxidation pathway. OIA: oxindolylalanine, NFK: N-formylkynurenine, KYN: Kynurenine. (B) Multiple alignment of D1 protein from
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Detected oxidative modifications at Trp14 of D1 in
(A) Trp-oxidation pathway. (B) Mass spectra of Trp14 carrying peptide 9ESESL(W)GR16 of D1 protein in
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
Detected oxidative modifications at Trp317 of D1 in
(A) Trp-oxidation pathway. (B) Mass spectra of Trp317 carrying peptide 313VINT(W)ADIINR323 of D1 protein in
Figure 1—figure supplement 3.
Positions of oxidized Trp residues in the identified peptide of PSII core complex by the MS-MS analysis.
The oxidized Trp residues in D2 (A), CP43(B), and CP47 (C) were highlighted. Orange color boxes indicate the identified peptide by the MS-MS analysis. Oxidized Trp residues are highlighted in red.
Figure 1—figure supplement 4.
Structural positions of oxidized Trp residues in PSII core proteins.
The structure is from
Figure 1—animation 1.
Oxidized Trp residues assigned in the PSII dimer.
Results
Increased OPTM of Trp residues in
Previous studies using isolated spinach thylakoid membranes and
Table 1.
Modification reported in Trp in PSII core proteins.
Organism | Protein | Sequence | Modified Trp residue | Oxidation status | Position in Chlamydomonas | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spinach | D1 | VINT(W*)ADIINR | Trp317 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp317 | Dreaden Kasson et al., 2012 |
D2 | FTKDEKDLFDSMDD(W*)LR | Trp22 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp21 | ||
DLFDSMDD(W*)LR | Trp22 | OIA, KYN | Trp21 | |||
CP43 | AP(W*)LEPLR | Trp365 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp353 | ||
AP(W*)LEPLRGPNGLDLSR | Trp365 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp353 | |||
AP(W*)LEPLR | Trp365 | OIA, KYN | Trp353 | Anderson et al., 2002 | ||
F(W*)DLR | Trp359 | OIA | Trp347 | Dreaden Kasson et al., 2012 | ||
DIQP(W*)QER | Trp387 | OIA | Trp375 | |||
| D1 | ESESL(W*)GR | Trp14 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp14 | Dogra et al., 2019 |
VINT(W*)ADIINR | Trp317 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp317 | |||
D2 | DLFDIMDD(W*)LR | Trp22 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp21 | ||
A(W*)MAAQDQPHENLIFPEEVLPR | Trp329 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp328 | |||
CP43 | AP(W*)LEPLR | Trp365 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp353 | ||
DIQP(W*)QER | Trp387 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp375 | |||
CP47 | YQ(W*)DQGYFQQEIYR | Trp275 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp275 | ||
VSAGLAENQSLSEA(W*)AK | Trp302 | OIA, NFK, KYN | Trp302 | |||
OIA: oxindolylalanine, NFK: N-formylkynurenine |
OPTM of Trp residues in
To validate whether Trp oxidation detected in
Table 2.
Trp oxidation in
Accession | Protein | Sequence | range | Modified Trp residue | Oxidation status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DAA00922.1_20 | D1 | ENSSL(W*)AR | 9–16 | Trp14 | OIA, NFK, KYN |
FCcamE(W*)ITSTENR | 17–27 | Trp20 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
E(W*)WELSFR | 130–136 | Trp131 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
VLNT(W*)ADIINR | 313–323 | Trp317 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
DAA00964.1_63 | D2 | T(W*)FDDADDWLR | 13–23 | Trp14 | OIA, NFK, KYN |
TWFDDADD(W*)LR | 13–23 | Trp21 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
T(W*)FDDADD(W*)LR | 13–23 | Trp14, Trp21 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
A(W*)MAAQDQPHER | 327–338 | Trp328 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
A(W*)MoxAAQDQPHER | 327–338 | Trp328 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
DAA00966.1_65 | CP43 | DQETTGFA(W*)WSGNAR | 15–29 | Trp23 | OIA, NFK, KYN |
DQETTGFAW(W*)SGNAR | 15–29 | Trp24 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
DQETTGFA(W*)(W*)SGNAR | 15–29 | Trp23, Trp24 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
AMoxYFGGVYDT(W*)APGGGDVR | 167–185 | Trp177 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
GP(W*)LEPLR | 351–358 | Trp353 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
NDIQP(W*)QER | 370–378 | Trp375 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
DAA00933.1_31 | CP47 | YQ(W*)DQGFFQQEIQK | 273–286 | Trp275 | OIA, NFK, KYN |
VQASLAEGASLSDA(W*)SR | 288–304 | Trp302 | OIA, NFK, KYN | ||
TGAMoxNSGDGIAVG(W*)LGHASFK | 327–347 | Trp340 | OIA, NFK, KYN |
Ccam, Cys carbamidomethylation; W*, Trp oxidative modifications; Mox, Met oxidation.
Site-directed mutagenesis of Trp residues undergoing OPTM in D1
To test whether any change in the oxidized Trp residues is associated with D1 degradation, we performed site-directed mutagenesis using chloroplast transformation in
Figure 2.
High-light sensitive phenotype in the
(A) Schematic drawing of the transforming vector carrying
Figure 2—figure supplement 1.
High-light sensitive phenotype in the
Phototrophic growth of Trp-substituted transformants on HSM medium. GL, growth light (30 µmol photons m−2s−1): HL, high light (320 µmol photons m−2s−1).
In contrast, Phe substitution at the same sites had little effect on their growth under growth light (30 µmol photons m–2s–1). These transformants (W14F, W317F, and W14F/W317F) accumulated PSII core proteins whose amounts were comparable to the control levels. They did not show a substantial change in photosynthetic activities as evidenced by comparable electron transport rates through the PSII complex and oxygen-evolving activity (Figure 2C and E). We next examined their photoautotrophic growth under high light (320 µmol photons m–2s–1). Under this condition, however, W14F exhibited significantly impaired growth, and W317F grew slightly slower than control cells. Double mutant W14F/W317F synergistically increased high-light sensitivity but the growth defect appeared to be similar to W14F, suggesting that Phe substitution at Trp-14, but not at Trp-317 had profound effects in the PSII repair cycle (Figure 2B and Figure 2—figure supplement 1).
Site-directed mutagenesis of Trp residues in CP43
We next examined high-light sensitivity in the CP43 Trp mutants. As an important step in the PSII repair, PSII complex is partially disassembled by CP43 detachment, and this process likely allows FtsH to access photo-damaged D1. Therefore, Trp oxidation in CP43 may play a role in PSII disassembly and D1 degradation concomitantly. To test this, we substituted Trp-353 and Trp-375 for either Ala or Phe as carried out in D1. Transformants were generated by cotransformation of Fud7, using the vector harboring wild-type
Figure 3.
Characterization of Chlamydomonas CP43 transformants in which Trp-353 and Trp-375 were mutated.
(A) Phototrophic growth on HSM medium and mixotrophic growth on TAP medium at growth light (GL) at 30 μmol m−2s−1 or high light, (HL) at 320 μmol m−2s−1. (B) Protein accumulation in the transformants. Thylakoid proteins of cells grown in TAP medium under growth light condition were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with antibodies against PSII subunits (D1 and CP43).
Substitution of Trp-14 with Phe accelerates D1 degradation
To evaluate whether Trp substitution in D1 affects PSII damage or repair, we next measured the maximum quantum yield of PSII (FV/FM) and subsequently monitored D1 levels under growth or high-light conditions. Trp-substituted lines grown in TAP medium under growth light were pre-incubated in the presence or absence of chloramphenicol (CAM), an inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis. CAM blocks the PSII repair at the step of D1 synthesis and allows us to evaluate photodamage and D1 degradation. Cells incubated under growth light or high light were subjected to chlorophyll fluorescence measurement and immunoblot analysis. Under growth light condition and in the absence of CAM, both PSII activity (FV/FM values) and D1 levels were comparable among all Trp-substituted lines and the control (Figure 4A). This result was consistent with their photoautotrophic growth under growth light (Figure 2B). When CAM was added, D1 levels decreased only slightly during incubation (90 min) in the control. D1 degradation rate was comparable in all Trp-substituted lines and control (Figure 4C), indicating that all Trp-substituted D1 proteins formed stable and functional PSII complex under growth light.
Figure 4.
D1 degradation assay in W14F and W317F transformants demonstrating enhanced D1 degradation under high-light stress.
The transformants were incubated under high-light (320 µmol photons m−2s−1) or growth-light (30 µmol photons m−2s−1) conditions in the absence or presence of inhibitor of chloroplast protein synthesis, CAM, and subjected to D1 degradation assay. (A) Growth-light in the absence of CAM; (B) high-light in the absence of CAM; (C) growth-light in the presence of CAM; (D) high-light in the presence of CAM. Immunoblot results of D1 in the transformants are shown at the top of each panel. A representative immunoblot using anti-D1 is depicted. Quantified D1 levels using NIH Image program are shown in the middle. Values are means ± SD. Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between the mean values (*<0.05, **<0.01; Student’s t-test). Time course analysis of maximal photochemical efficiency of PSII, FV/FM, are shown at the bottom.
Under high-light condition, however, FV/FM values in Trp-substituted lines significantly decreased, compared to that observed in the control even in the absence of CAM (Figure 4B). These vulnerabilities to high light were consistent with their impaired growth under high light (Figure 2B). To our surprise, D1 levels in W14F and W14F/W317F concomitantly decreased during high-light incubation (Figure 4B). In contrast, D1 levels in W317F were similar to those in control cells. When the PSII repair engages properly, high-light irradiation does not alter D1 levels because rapid D1 synthesis compensates turnover of photo-damaged D1. Given decreased D1 under high light, W14F was likely to cause faster D1 degradation. To confirm this possibility, D1 degradation in the presence of CAM was measured. PSII activity in all Trp-substituted lines fell at similar rates compared with control cells in the presence of the CAM (Figure 4D), indicating the light-induced damage was at the similar level among all Trp-substituted lines and the control. In contrast, our time course experiment indicated that W14F and W14F/W317F decreased D1 faster than the control and W317F (Figure 4D); the D1 level in W14F and W14F/W317F decreased approximately 60% and 50% of the initial level, respectively, whereas those in control cells and W317F remained 80% (Figure 4D).
Based on these D1 degradation assays, we assumed that D1 degradation by proteolysis was enhanced by W14F substitution, despite the fact that PSII suffered from photodamage equally among other lines and the control during high-light irradiation. To exclude the possibility that W14F decelerates D1 synthesis rather than accelerating degradation, we analyzed protein synthesis in Trp-substituted lines by in vivo pulse labeling in the presence of cycloheximide, which prevents the synthesis of the nuclear-encoded proteins. As shown in Figure 5, D1 synthesis was shown to proceed comparably in all lines. Collectively, our findings demonstrated that Trp-14 substitution to Phe enhanced D1 degradation, whereas it affected neither the light-induced damage in PSII, D1 synthesis, nor PSII stability.
Figure 5.
Protein synthesis in the transformants studied by in vivo protein labeling.
Cells were radio-labeled in vivo with 35S, in the presence of cycloheximide for 1, 2, and 4 min. Total proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE. The bands corresponding to D1 is indicated by arrowheads. Quantified newly synthesized D1 levels using the Image J program are shown in bottom panels. To normalize values from four independent experiments, the ratio of control at 4 min was adjusted as 1, and the relative ratios are indicated. Values are means ± SD.
Enhanced D1 degradation due to the substitution of Trp-14 is mitigated in the
To address whether the increased D1 degradation in W14F (and W14F/W317F) involved proteolysis by FtsH, these Trp substitutions were introduced into an
Figure 6.
D1 degradation assay in W14F and W14F/W317F transformants in the
Rate of D1 degradation in the W14F
Molecular dynamics simulation suggests W14F mimicking Trp-14 oxidation
Although our site-directed mutagenesis in Trp-14 showed its effect in D1 degradation, how Trp oxidation can be structurally correlated with Trp to Phe mutagenesis should be taken into consideration. To investigate this, we employed molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, a powerful tool to simulate movements of amino acids in a protein complex, using the crystal structure of PSII complex from
Figure 7.
Snapshots and structural fluctuation of D1-Trp14 in molecular dynamics simulations of PSII.
(A) The interaction between D1 Trp-14 and PsbI Ser-25. Dash line indicates the hydrogen bond between the side chains. (B) Position change of side-chain when D1 Trp-14 is oxidized to N-formylkynurenine. (C) Position change of side-chain when D1 Trp-14 is substituted to Phe. (D) The fluctuation of atoms at D1 Trp-14 in the MD simulation. (E) Averaged Cβ-Cβ distance between side chains of D1 Trp-14 and PsbI Ser-25. The error bars represent the standard deviations of the distances. The Cβ atoms are indicated as red arrowheads in A.
Figure 7—figure supplement 1.
Atomic partial charges of NFK.
Red values represent atomic partial charges calculated by using the RESP procedure.
Augmented interaction between D1 and FtsH by substituting Trp-14/317
Presented experimental results collectively raise the possibility that oxidation of Trp-14 is one of the key OPTMs for D1 degradation by FtsH. We raised a possibility that W14F mimics Trp-14 oxidation and shows increased FtsH association with D1. Since quantitative interaction of the protein and the protease remains to be elucidated, we performed differential pull-down assay. To emphasize the effect of the substituted amino acid residues and minimize potential oxidation of other amino acid residues, we decreased light intensity during cell culture and removed oxygen molecule from the buffer solution during the assay.
Figure 8.
Augmented affinity of FtsH with D1 by W14F/W317F.
(A) Coimmunoprecipitation was performed with anti-FtsH antibody using the thylakoid membrane isolated from control or D1-W14F/W317F. The polypeptides of thylakoid membrane or coimmunoprecipitated samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and detected by immunoblotting with anti-D1, anti-D2, and anti-FtsH antibody. (B) The immunoblotting signals are quantified and the ratio of D1 or D2 to FtsH are calculated. The averaged value and standard error for three biological replicates are shown. Significant difference was calculated by t-test and 0.1 (§) or 0.05 (*) probability confidence were indicated respectively. (C), A proposed model of photodamaged D1 recognition, in which Trp oxidation plays a role in recruiting FtsH. FtsH heterocomplexes (blue) and PSII core proteins (green) along with oxygen evolving protein complex (gray) in the thylakoid membrane are schematically shown. Trp-oxidized residues (red) are localized at both lumenal and stromal sides. Trp-14 located at the N-terminus alpha helix enhances association of FtsH, whose catalytic site faces stroma.
Discussion
Recent progress in mass-spectrometry has advanced our understanding of holistic OPTM in photosynthetic protein complexes. Along this line, we investigated Trp oxidation in PSII in this study, and attempted to address whether any modification in amino acid residues was correlated with the PSII repair. PSII is one of the major sites for ROS generation due to photoinhibition, and oxidized amino acid residues in PSII core proteins have been reported previously (Kale et al., 2017; Frankel et al., 2012). In general, Met and Cys are sensitive amino acid residues for ROS-mediated oxidation (Rinalducci et al., 2008; Ehrenshaft et al., 2015). However, those OPTMs can be converted back in reduced forms by methionine sulfoxide reductase and disulfide reductase, respectively. In contrast, Trp oxidation is irreversible, and its replacement requires whole protein degradation and de novo synthesis, implicating Trp suitable for flagging photo-oxidative damaged proteins that undergo degradation in the PSII repair.
Previous studies have reported OPTM of several Trp residues in PSII core proteins in vitro (Dreaden Kasson et al., 2012; Dreaden et al., 2011; Anderson et al., 2002). In addition, Dogra et al. confirmed several oxidized Trp residues in PSII core proteins of
OPTM of Trp residues causes irreversible modification and is likely to mark photo-damaged D1 protein as a substrate for degradation. In the PSII repair, a series of events including migration of photo-damaged PSII to non-appressed regions of thylakoid membranes, release of CP43 from the PSII, and recognition of photo-damaged D1 for selective D1 degradation, are essential. In this scenario, FtsH interacts with a partially disassembled PSII complex lacking CP43 protein, called RC47 (Kato and Sakamoto, 2009; Järvi et al., 2015). Close access to the photo-damaged D1, followed by the recognition of its N-terminal region, is concomitantly necessary for FtsH to proceed with processive D1 degradation. Therefore, the OPTM would be involved in the CP43 disassembly or the recognition of damaged D1 protein. A recent study showed that exogenous ROS treatment leads to PSII disassembly supports this model (McKenzie and Puthiyaveetil, 2023). Krynická et al. indicate that the accessibility to PSII core proteins drives selective protein degradation by FtsH in the cyanobacterium
To examine its effect on D1 degradation, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of the corresponding Trp residues using
Because FtsH-mediated D1 degradation is crucial for the PSII repair cycle, recognition of photodamaged D1 by FtsH protease is a critical step. Following observations suggest that Trp-14 oxidation is one of the key OPTMs for degrading photodamaged D1. First, enhanced D1 degradation in W14F well fits the notion that PTM in the N-terminus of D1 is important to execute processive degradation by FtsH, as proposed previously. For example, the lack of an N-terminal helix attenuates proper D1 degradation (Komenda et al., 2007; Michoux et al., 2016). The excision of N-terminal Met by organellar Met aminopeptidase and prokaryotic-like peptide deformylase was shown to be required for FtsH-mediated D1 degradation (Adam et al., 2011). Phosphorylation of the D1 N-terminus was also shown to affect proteolysis and contribute to the spatiotemporal regulation of D1 degradation pathway (Koivuniemi et al., 1995; Rintamäki et al., 1996; Kato and Sakamoto, 2014). Together with these, it is possible that Trp-14 oxidation is likely to play a role in ‘photodamage-dependent’ degradation, although we cannot rule out the possibility that other OPTMs may have additive effects. Second, our MD simulation strongly suggests that W14F is similar to Trp-14 oxidation W14* (modified as NFK) in terms of allowing a regional conformational change around the N-terminal helix, thereby increasing fluctuation of the side chain. This fluctuation appears to be manifested by losing hydrogen bonding with Ser-25 of PsbI, a short peptide localized close to D1 and CP43 in the PSII core complex. Although further studies are needed, our simulation is consistent with our notion that Trp-14 is a target of OPTM that alters subtle but critical structural change at the N-terminus of D1.
Based on these observations, we propose a working model of ‘photodamaged D1 recognition’ in which Trp oxidation plays a role in processive degradation by FtsH (Figure 8C). As a consequence of photoinhibition, ROS is produced around PSII and leads to OPTM of numerous residues. Among these, Trp-14 and Trp-317 are prone to oxidation likely due to their relative positions in PSII. While oxidation takes place in both, Trp-14 causes a conformational change at the N-terminus, which triggers enhanced access of FtsH for subsequent processive degradation. Supporting this, we observed augmented association between D1 and FtsH in W14F/W317F (Figure 8). It is unlikely, however, that Trp-14 oxidation alone is sufficient to drive degradation of photodamaged D1, because a stepwise dissociation of PSII core complexes is prerequisite. It is also possible that other oxidative modifications are synergistically involved in D1 degradation. A recent study using
OPTM of Trp residues has been observed in various proteins (Kasson and Barry, 2012). For example, Trp oxidation has been identified in ATP synthase alpha subunit in mitochondria, one of the target proteins for oxidative stress in the mitochondrial inner membrane (Rexroth et al., 2012). In this case, the oxidation is not random but selectively targets specific Trp. The oxidized ATP synthase might be degraded by mitochondrial FtsH homologs, m-AAA and i-AAA proteases, which have an essential role in the quality control of aberrant proteins in mitochondrial membranes. Furthermore, a previous study in chloroplasts suggests the Trp oxidation in the stress responses related to singlet oxygen; Dogra et al., 2019 report specific oxidation of Trp in EXECUTER1 (EX1), a sensor protein of singlet oxygen in plastid signaling. The oxidation of specific Trp residue is required for ROS signaling mediated by light-dependent EX1 degradation by FtsH (Dogra et al., 2019). Together with our results, these reports imply a general mechanism between oxidized modification of target protein and substrate recognition by FtsH. Future proteomic approaches for investigating OPTM will reveal the general substrate recognition mechanisms by FtsH in the thylakoid membranes.
Methods
Detection of Trp oxidation in
Chloroplasts were isolated from 3-week-old plants of WT and
Mass spectrometric analysis for protein identification and PTM analysis was done according to our previous study (Dogra et al., 2019). For MS analysis, equal amounts of total protein (2 µg µl–1) from three independent biological samples were denatured using 10 mM DTT at 56 °C for 30 min followed by alkylation in 50 mM iodoacetamide at room temperature for 40 min in the dark. Reduced-alkylated proteins were then desalted a Nanosep membrane (Pall Corporation, MWCO 10 K) in 200 µL of 100 mM NH4HCO3 buffer, followed by digestion in buffer containing 40 ng/µl trypsin in 100 mM NH4HCO3 (corresponding to the enzyme-to-protein ratio of 1:50) at 37 °C for 20 h. The digested peptides were dried and resuspended in 0.1% (v/v) formic acid solution. Digested peptides were separated using nanoAcquity Ultra Performance LC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and analyzed by using Q Exactive Mass Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) as described in our previous study (Dogra et al., 2019). The mass spectra were submitted to the Mascot Server (version 2.5.1, Matrix Science, London, UK) for peptide identification and scanned against the
Strains and generation of chloroplast transformants in
The
Detection of Trp oxidation in
Cultivation of the algae was carried out under constant light (50 µmol photons m−2s−1 or 500 µmol photons m−2s−1) in TAP medium for 24 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation (2500 x g for 5 min at room temperature), frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80 °C until further use. For protein extraction, lysis buffer (100 mM Tris/HCl pH 8.5, 2% (w/v) SDS, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM benzamidine) was added to frozen cell pellets and incubated for 10 min at 65 °C and 1000 rpm in a Thermomixer (Eppendorf, Germany). The lysate was cleared by centrifugation (18,000 x
MS full scans (m/z 350–1600) were acquired in positive ion mode at a resolution of 70,000 (FWHM, at m/z 200) with internal lock mass calibration on m/z 445.120025. The AGC target was set to 3e6 and the maximum injection time to 50ms. For MS2, the 12 most intense ions with charge states 2–4 were fragmented by higher-energy c-trap dissociation (HCD) at 27% normalized collision energy. AGC target value was set to 5e4, minimum AGC target to 5.5e2, maximum injection time to 55ms and precursor isolation window to 1.5 m/z.
Peptide and protein identification were carried out in Proteome Discoverer 2.4 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using the MSFragger node (MSFragger 3.0)(Kong et al., 2017) with default parameters for closed searches (precursor mass tolerance: 50 ppm, precursor true tolerance: 20 ppm, fragment mass tolerance: 20 ppm, maximum missed cleavages: 1). Spectra were searched against a concatenated sequence database containing nucleus-encoded proteins (https://www.phytozome.org, assembly version 5.0, annotation version 5.6), supplemented with proteins encoded in the chloroplast (NCBI BK000554.2) and mitochondria (NCBI NC_001638.1), as well as common contaminants (cRAP, https://www.thegpm.org/crap/). Carbamidomethylation was set as static modification. The following variable modifications were defined: N-acetylation of protein N-termini, oxidation of methionine, and various products of tryptophan oxidation kynurenine (+3.995 Da), hydroxytryptophan (+15.995 Da), hydroxykynurenine (+19.990 Da), N-formylkynurenine (+31.990 Da), dihydroxy-N-formylkynurenine (+63.980 Da). Peptide-spectrum-matches (PSMs) were filtered using the Percolator node to satisfy a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.01. Subsequently, identifications were filtered to achieve a peptide and protein level FDR of 0.01.
Growth test
Cells were grown in TAP liquid medium without shaking at 23–24°C under the light-dark synchronized condition (10 hr light at 50 µmol photons m−2s−1 or less and 14 hr darkness). Subsequently the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 2000×
Measurement of photosynthetic activity
Chlorophyll fluorescence induction kinetics of
Immunoblotting
Total proteins were solubilized in SDS-PAGE sample (125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 2% [w/v] SDS, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 10% [v/v] Glycerol, 0.05% [w/v] BPB) buffer at 96 °C for 1 min, and then were loaded based on equal chlorophyll. The proteins were electrophoretically transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Atto Corp.) after SDS-PAGE. The membranes were incubated with specific polyclonal antibodies: anti-D1 (raised against N-termimus, dilution 1:5000 Kato et al., 2012), anti-D2 (AS06 146, Agrisera; dilution, 1:5000), anti-CP43 (AS11 1787, Agrisera; dilution, 1:5000), anti-PsaA (a gift from Kevin Redding, Arizona State University, dilution 1:5000), and anti-Lhca1, dilution 1:5000; (Ozawa et al., 2018). The signals were visualized by using a Luminata Forte Western HRP Substrate (Merck Millipore) with Molecular Imager ChemiDoc XRS +imaging system (Bio Rad Laboratories, Inc, USA). Signal intensities were quantified using NIH Image.
D1 degradation assay
Cells were grown in TAP liquid medium at 22 °C under continuous light-condition (30 µmol photons m–2s–1). Cultured cells were harvested by centrifugation at 600×
Pulse labeling of chloroplastic proteins
Cells grown in pre-culture medium (TAP media with less sulfur) were harvested by centrifugation at 600×
Thylakoid membrane isolation and the following co-immunoprecipitation in anoxic aqueous solution
Cells grown in TAP medium under 5 μmol photons m–2 s–1 were harvested by centrifugation at 2,000×g for 10 min at 25 °C. All buffers were incubated at 25 °C for 60 min in the presence of 100 mM glucose, 40 U/mL glucose oxidase, and 50 U/mL catalase to remove oxygen before chilling. Cells were suspended in suspension buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 8.0), broken by double passage through an airbrush at a pressure of 0.2 MPa (0.2 mm aperture airbrush). The broken materials were suspended in high sucrose concentration solution (1.8 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 8.0), and then a low sucrose concentration solution (1.0 M sucrose, 10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 8.0) and suspension buffer were layered in this order. Thylakoid membrane was floated at the interface between high-sucrose concentration solution and low sucrose concentration solution after centrifugation (at 20,000×
The anti-VAR2 antibody (Sakamoto et al., 2003) was conjugated with magnetic beads (Magnosphere, MS 160/Tosyl, JSR life sciences, Japan) by the presence of the fully chemically synthesized polymer (Blockmaster CE210, JSR life sciences, Japan) according to the instruction manual. The conjugated and blocked magnetic beads were suspended in the suspension buffer (10 mM HEPES-KOH pH 8.0) after washing TBS-T. Prior to the incubation with solubilized thylakoid membrane, the magnetic beads were resuspended in the suspension buffer of which oxygen was removed enzymatically by incubating at 25 °C for 60 min in the presence of 100 mM glucose, 40 U/mL glucose oxidase, and 50 U/mL catalase.
Thylakoid membrane was solubilized sequentially; thylakoid membrane (1.0 mg Chlorophyll/mL) was incubated with 1.0% (w/v) glyco-diosgenin (GDN) and subsequently n-dodecyl-α-maltoside was added at 1.0% (w/v), and finally the mixture was diluted at twice volume with suspension buffer. The solubilized material was incubated with FtsH conjugated magnetic beads for 60 min at 4 °C after removal of debris by centrifugation (at 20,000×
Molecular dynamics simulations of D1 N-term in PSII complex
The MD simulations for PSII were performed using the X-ray crystal structure determined at 1.9 Å resolution (PDB: 3ARC)(Umena et al., 2011) and based on the same procedure described previously (Sakashita et al., 2017b; Sakashita et al., 2017a; Kawashima et al., 2018), except for the following points. To investigate the structural fluctuation of the N terminal region of the D1 subunit, we restructured the N-terminal region between D1-Met1 and D1-Ser10 that was lacking in the crystal structure, using MOE program (2018). After structural optimization with positional restraints on heavy atoms of the PSII assembly, the system was heated from 0.001 to 300 K over 5.0 ps, with a 0.05-fs time step. The positional restraints on heavy atoms were gradually released over 16.5 ns. After an equilibrating MD run for 40 ns, a production run was conducted over 495 ns with an MD time step of 1.5 fs. The SHAKE algorithm was used for hydrogen constraints (Ryckaert et al., 1977). The structure of the D1-W14F mutant was modeled from the crystal structure of WT. The MD simulations were based on the AMBER-ff14SB force field for protein residues and lipids (Maier et al., 2015). The water molecules were described by TIP3P model (Jorgensen et al., 1983). For NFK, we employed the generalized Amber force field (GAFF) parameter set (Wang et al., 2004). The atomic partial charges of NFK were determined by fitting the electrostatic potential by using the RESP procedure (Bayly et al., 1993) (for calculated charges, see Figure 7—figure supplement 1). The electronic wave functions were calculated after geometry optimization with the density functional theory of the B3LYP/6–31 G** level by using JAGUAR (ver. 8.0, https://www.schrodinger.com/products/jaguar). MD simulations were conducted using the MD engine NAMD (Phillips et al., 2005). The atomic fluctuation was calculated as the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) of heavy atoms from the averaged structure of PSII over the whole MD trajectory.
Plasmid construction
To construct
A chloroplast transformation vector for
To introduce a point mutation at the D1-W14 codon, an EcoRI/NspI fragment from plasmid pR12-EX-50-AAD, which contains
To substitute D1-W317 codon by Alanine (A) codon, a PCR-amplified fragment from total
To generate CP43 mutants, we first deleted
To introduce a point mutation(s) at the CP43-W365 and the CP43-W387 codons, an inverse PCR product was amplified from the pSXY1002 using primers On#26 and On#27, and self-ligated to generate pSXY1032. An EcoRI-PmlI fragment of the pSXY1032 was cloned into the EcoRI-PmlI site of the pSXY1007 to generate pSXY1033. For CP43-W365 and CP43-W387 mutagenesis, each PCR product, which carried mutated CP43-W365 and/or mutated CP43-W387 codons, was amplified from wild type Chlamydomonas total DNA using primers On#28 to On#33, and introduced into PstI site of the pSXY1033 with In-Fusion HD cloning kit (Takara) to generate transformation vectors pSXY1034 to pSXY1039 (Seq: On#22).
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
© 2023, Kato, Kuroda, Ozawa et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.
Abstract
Photosynthesis is one of the most important reactions for sustaining our environment. Photosystem II (PSII) is the initial site of photosynthetic electron transfer by water oxidation. Light in excess, however, causes the simultaneous production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to photo-oxidative damage in PSII. To maintain photosynthetic activity, the PSII reaction center protein D1, which is the primary target of unavoidable photo-oxidative damage, is efficiently degraded by FtsH protease. In PSII subunits, photo-oxidative modifications of several amino acids such as Trp have been indeed documented, whereas the linkage between such modifications and D1 degradation remains elusive. Here, we show that an oxidative post-translational modification of Trp residue at the N-terminal tail of D1 is correlated with D1 degradation by FtsH during high-light stress. We revealed that
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer