It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
To reduce the overaccumulation of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere, direct air CO2 capture (DACC) technologies must (a) satisfy the process requirements for heat and electricity with energy that has few if any CO2 emissions, and (b) physically isolate the CO2 from the atmosphere after its extraction from the air. To isolate the CO2 from the atmosphere at meaningful scale, the CO2 will likely need to be geologically stored in deep saline aquifers. Here we propose to leverage geologic CO2 storage (GCS) in sedimentary basin geothermal resources to produce geothermal heat and electricity for the process energy requirements of solid sorbent DACC. This sedimentary basin CO2-driven geothermal utilization (SB-CO2DGU, also known as CO2 Plume Geothermal) circulates some of the emplaced CO2 to extract geothermal heat in a closed loop between the subsurface reservoir and surface geothermal facility. The proposed integration of DACC and CO2-driven geothermal Utilization and Storage (DACCUS) adds CO2 from the air to this closed loop system that produces renewable energy for use in the DACC process. The strategy first primes the GCS reservoir with CO2 from large point sources, and then integrates CO2 from DACC facility to form the DACCUS system. We focus on the process integration of DACCUS and present a case study of its potential deployment and scaling in the Gulf Coast of the United States. We combine data from prior analyses for a novel investigation of two DACCUS configurations: (1) a DACCUS heat system uses the geothermal heat to regenerate the solid sorbent in the DACC process, and (2) a DACCUS heat and power system uses the electricity generated from the produced geothermal heat for the DACC process. In general, deeper CO2 storage reservoirs (>3.5 km) with higher geothermal temperature gradients (>35 °C km−1), may provide sufficient production wellhead temperatures (>100 °C), and satisfy the electric load in 93% of the combinations of reservoir characteristics we examined.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details


1 Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH, United States of America
2 Department of Civil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH, United States of America; John Glenn College of Public Affairs, The Ohio State University , Columbus, OH, United States of America