It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
The Josephson junction is a building block of quantum circuits. Its behavior, well understood when treated as an isolated entity, is strongly affected by coupling to an electromagnetic environment. In 1983, Schmid predicted that a Josephson junction shunted by a resistance exceeding the resistance quantum RQ = h/4e2 ≈ 6.45 kΩ for Cooper pairs would become insulating since the phase fluctuations would destroy the coherent Josephson coupling. However, recent microwave measurements have questioned this interpretation. Here, we insert a small Josephson junction in a Johnson-Nyquist-type setup where it is driven by weak current noise arising from thermal fluctuations. Our heat probe minimally perturbs the junction’s equilibrium, shedding light on features not visible in charge transport. We find that the Josephson critical current completely vanishes in DC charge transport measurement, and the junction demonstrates Coulomb blockade in agreement with the theory. Surprisingly, thermal transport measurements show that the Josephson junction acts as an inductor at high frequencies, unambiguously demonstrating that a supercurrent survives despite the Coulomb blockade observed in DC measurements.
The predicted dissipative quantum phase transition in a Josephson junction coupled to resistive environment has been examined in recent experiments. In a heat transport experiment, Subero et al. show that the junction acts as an inductor at high frequencies, while DC charge transport confirms insulating behaviour.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details








1 Aalto University School of Science, PICO Group, QTF Centre of Excellence, Department of Applied Physics, Aalto, Finland (GRID:grid.5373.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0838 9418)
2 Aalto University School of Science, PICO Group, QTF Centre of Excellence, Department of Applied Physics, Aalto, Finland (GRID:grid.5373.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0838 9418); Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, SPEC, Gif-sur-Yvette, France (GRID:grid.460789.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 4910 6535)
3 Aalto University School of Science, PICO Group, QTF Centre of Excellence, Department of Applied Physics, Aalto, Finland (GRID:grid.5373.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0838 9418); University of Helsinki, QTF Centre of Excellence, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Helsinki, Finland (GRID:grid.7737.4) (ISNI:0000 0004 0410 2071)
4 Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Departamento de Física Teórica de la Materia Condensada, Condensed Matter Physics Center (IFIMAC) and Instituto Nicolás Cabrera, Madrid, Spain (GRID:grid.5515.4) (ISNI:0000 0001 1957 8126)