Abstract

Background

Increased pulmonary 18F-FDG metabolism in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and other forms of diffuse parenchymal lung disease, can predict measurements of health and lung physiology. To improve PET quantification, voxel-wise air fractions (AF) determined from CT can be used to correct for variable air content in lung PET/CT. However, resolution mismatches between PET and CT can cause artefacts in the AF-corrected image.

Methods

Three methodologies for determining the optimal kernel to smooth the CT are compared with noiseless simulations and non-TOF MLEM reconstructions of a patient-realistic digital phantom: (i) the point source insertion-and-subtraction method, hpts; (ii) AF-correcting with varyingly smoothed CT to achieve the lowest RMSE with respect to the ground truth (GT) AF-corrected volume of interest (VOI), hAFC; iii) smoothing the GT image to match the reconstruction within the VOI, hPVC. The methods were evaluated both using VOI-specific kernels, and a single global kernel optimised for the six VOIs combined. Furthermore, hPVC was implemented on thorax phantom data measured on two clinical PET/CT scanners with various reconstruction protocols.

Results

The simulations demonstrated that at <200 iterations (200 i), the kernel width was dependent on iteration number and VOI position in the lung. The hpts method estimated a lower, more uniform, kernel width in all parts of the lung investigated. However, all three methods resulted in approximately equivalent AF-corrected VOI RMSEs (<10%) at 200i. The insensitivity of AF-corrected quantification to kernel width suggests that a single global kernel could be used. For all three methodologies, the computed global kernel resulted in an AF-corrected lung RMSE <10%  at 200i, while larger lung RMSEs were observed for the VOI–specific kernels. The global kernel approach was then employed with the hPVC method on measured data. The optimally smoothed GT emission matched the reconstructed image well, both within the VOI and the lung background. VOI RMSE was <10%, pre-AFC, for all reconstructions investigated.

Conclusions

Simulations for non-TOF PET indicated that around 200i were needed to approach image resolution stability in the lung. In addition, at this iteration number, a single global kernel, determined from several VOIs, for AFC, performed well over the whole lung. The hPVC method has the potential to be used to determine the kernel for AFC from scans of phantoms on clinical scanners.

Details

Title
Optimisation of the air fraction correction for lung PET/CT: addressing resolution mismatch
Author
Leek, Francesca 1   VIAFID ORCID Logo  ; Anderson, Cameron 2 ; Robinson, Andrew P. 3 ; Moss, Robert M. 4 ; Porter, Joanna C. 5 ; Garthwaite, Helen S. 5 ; Groves, Ashley M. 2 ; Hutton, Brian F. 2 ; Thielemans, Kris 6 

 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257); National Physical Laboratory, Nuclear Medicine Metrology, Teddington, UK (GRID:grid.410351.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8991 6349) 
 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257) 
 National Physical Laboratory, Nuclear Medicine Metrology, Teddington, UK (GRID:grid.410351.2) (ISNI:0000 0000 8991 6349); The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.412917.8) (ISNI:0000 0004 0430 9259); University of Manchester, Schuster Laboratory, School of Physics and Astronomy, Manchester, UK (GRID:grid.5379.8) (ISNI:0000 0001 2166 2407) 
 University College London, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201) 
 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, UCL Respiratory, University College London and Interstitial Lung Disease Service, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257) 
 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, Institute of Nuclear Medicine, London, UK (GRID:grid.52996.31) (ISNI:0000 0000 8937 2257); University College London, Centre for Medical Image Computing, London, UK (GRID:grid.83440.3b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2190 1201) 
Pages
77
Publication year
2023
Publication date
Dec 2023
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V.
e-ISSN
21977364
Source type
Scholarly Journal
Language of publication
English
ProQuest document ID
2897521929
Copyright
© The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.