It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Yogyakarta Special Region, one of Indonesia’s provinces, has many communal wastewater treatment plants (CWWTPs). However, less than 40% of the province’s CWWTPs are operationally viable. Based on data from the Environmental Agency of Sleman Regency, the physical and chemical parameters of approximately 163 CWWTPs were evaluated. Their biological characteristics, however, still need to be understood. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of CWWTPs in terms of biological parameters, specifically total Coliform and Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentrations in the observed CWWTPs. Five CWWTPs were used as study sites, namely IPAL Manunggal Pringgodani Sejati, IPAL Bakti Warga, IPAL Tambakrejo Bersih, IPAL Nologaten Bersih, and IPAL Andum Roso, which were classified as extremely high and high sanitation risk areas. The total Coliform and E. coli concentrations were determined using MPN techniques based on APHA 9221 (2017). The study found that the E. coli removal effectiveness of the CWWTPs in the very-high sanitation risk areas, namely IPAL Manunggal Pringgodani Sejati, IPAL Bakti Warga, and IPAL Tambakrejo Bersih, was 49%, 18%, and 83%, respectively. Furthermore, in high sanitation risk regions, such as IPAL Nologaten Bersih and IPAL Andum Roso, the CWWTPS were 17% and 73%, respectively. Total Coliform concentrations at all CWWTPs were below the standard limit set by Permen LHK No 68 and the EPA. The findings of this study will help to improve understanding of the WWTP process for E. coli elimination, which will, in turn, help to improve CWWTP performance.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details
1 Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology, Dept. of Environmental Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia; Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia
2 Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia
3 Laboratory of Environmental Risk Analysis, Dept. of Environmental Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia; Dept. of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Planning, Universitas Islam Indonesia