It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Deep learning (DL) models currently employed in materials research exhibit certain limitations in delivering meaningful information for interpreting predictions and comprehending the relationships between structure and material properties. To address these limitations, we propose an interpretable DL architecture that incorporates the attention mechanism to predict material properties and gain insights into their structure–property relationships. The proposed architecture is evaluated using two well-known datasets (the QM9 and the Materials Project datasets), and three in-house-developed computational materials datasets. Train–test–split validations confirm that the models derived using the proposed DL architecture exhibit strong predictive capabilities, which are comparable to those of current state-of-the-art models. Furthermore, comparative validations, based on first-principles calculations, indicate that the degree of attention of the atoms’ local structures to the representation of the material structure is critical when interpreting structure–property relationships with respect to physical properties. These properties encompass molecular orbital energies and the formation energies of crystals. The proposed architecture shows great potential in accelerating material design by predicting material properties and explicitly identifying crucial features within the corresponding structures.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details









1 Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan (GRID:grid.444515.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1762 2236)
2 HPC SYSTEMS Inc., Minato, Japan (GRID:grid.444515.5)
3 Deakin University, Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute, Geelong, Australia (GRID:grid.1021.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 0526 7079)
4 Georgia Institute of Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Atlanta, USA (GRID:grid.213917.f) (ISNI:0000 0001 2097 4943)
5 National Institute for Materials Science, Research and Services Division of Materials Data and Integrated System, Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.21941.3f) (ISNI:0000 0001 0789 6880)
6 National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Research Center for Computational Design of Advanced Functional Materials, Tsukuba, Japan (GRID:grid.208504.b) (ISNI:0000 0001 2230 7538)
7 University of Tokyo, Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, Kashiwa-shi, Japan (GRID:grid.26999.3d) (ISNI:0000 0001 2151 536X)
8 Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan (GRID:grid.444515.5) (ISNI:0000 0004 1762 2236); Tohoku University, International Center for Synchrotron Radiation Innovation Smart (SRIS), Aoba-ku, Japan (GRID:grid.69566.3a) (ISNI:0000 0001 2248 6943)