It appears you don't have support to open PDFs in this web browser. To view this file, Open with your PDF reader
Abstract
Neural networks are powerful tools for solving complex problems, but finding the right network topology for a given task remains an open question. Biology uses neurogenesis and structural plasticity to solve this problem. Advanced neural network algorithms are mostly relying on synaptic plasticity and learning. The main limitation in reconciling these two approaches is the lack of a viable hardware solution that could reproduce the bottom-up development of biological neural networks. Here, we show how the dendritic growth of PEDOT:PSS-based fibers through AC electropolymerization can implement structural plasticity during network development. We find that this strategy follows Hebbian principles and is able to define topologies that leverage better computing performances with sparse synaptic connectivity for solving non-trivial tasks. This approach is validated in software simulation, and offers up to 61% better network sparsity on classification and 50% in signal reconstruction tasks.
Neural networks are powerful tools for solving complex problems, but finding the right network topology for a given task remains an open question. Here, the authors propose a bio-inspired artificial neural network hardware able to self-adapt to solve new complex tasks, by autonomously connecting nodes using electropolymerization.
You have requested "on-the-fly" machine translation of selected content from our databases. This functionality is provided solely for your convenience and is in no way intended to replace human translation. Show full disclaimer
Neither ProQuest nor its licensors make any representations or warranties with respect to the translations. The translations are automatically generated "AS IS" and "AS AVAILABLE" and are not retained in our systems. PROQUEST AND ITS LICENSORS SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY WARRANTIES FOR AVAILABILITY, ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, NON-INFRINGMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. Your use of the translations is subject to all use restrictions contained in your Electronic Products License Agreement and by using the translation functionality you agree to forgo any and all claims against ProQuest or its licensors for your use of the translation functionality and any output derived there from. Hide full disclaimer
Details






1 Univ. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Univ. Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, UMR 8520-IEMN, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780)
2 Université de Sherbrooke, Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT), Sherbrooke, Canada (GRID:grid.86715.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 6198); Université de Sherbrooke, NECOTIS Research Lab, faculté de génie électrique et informatique, Sherbrooke, Canada (GRID:grid.86715.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 6198)
3 Univ. Lille, CNRS, Centrale Lille, Univ. Polytechnique Hauts-de-France, UMR 8520-IEMN, Lille, France (GRID:grid.503422.2) (ISNI:0000 0001 2242 6780); Université de Sherbrooke, Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT), Sherbrooke, Canada (GRID:grid.86715.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 6198); CNRS, Université de Sherbrooke, Laboratoire Nanotechnologies & Nanosystèmes (LN2), Sherbrooke, Canada (GRID:grid.86715.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 6198)
4 Université de Sherbrooke, Institut interdisciplinaire d’innovation technologique (3IT), Sherbrooke, Canada (GRID:grid.86715.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 6198); CNRS, Université de Sherbrooke, Laboratoire Nanotechnologies & Nanosystèmes (LN2), Sherbrooke, Canada (GRID:grid.86715.3d) (ISNI:0000 0000 9064 6198)